Zeina Al-Mansour

Gray zone lymphoma with features intermediate between classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma: Characteristics, outcomes, and prognostication among a large multicenter cohort

Gray zone lymphoma (GZL) with features between classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a recently recognized entity reported to present primarily with mediastinal disease (MGZL). We examined detailed clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors among 112 GZL patients recently treated across 19 North American centers. Forty‐three percent of patients presented with MGZL, whereas 57% had non‐MGZL (NMGZL). NMGZL patients were older (50 versus 37 years, P = 0.0001); more often had bone marrow involvement (19% versus 0%, P = 0.001); >1 extranodal site (27% versus 8%, P = 0.014); and advanced stage disease (81% versus 13%, P = 0.0001); but they had less bulk (8% versus 44%, P = 0.0001), compared with MGZL patients. Common frontline treatments were cyclophosphamide‐doxorubicin‐vincristine‐prednisone +/− rituximab (CHOP+/−R) 46%, doxorubicin‐bleomycin‐vinblastine‐dacarbazine +/− rituximab (ABVD+/−R) 30%, and dose‐adjusted etoposide‐doxorubicin‐cyclophosphamide‐vincristine‐prednisone‐rituximab (DA‐EPOCH‐R) 10%. Overall and complete response rates for all patients were 71% and 59%, respectively; 33% had primary refractory disease. At 31‐month median follow‐up, 2‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 40% and 88%, respectively. Interestingly, outcomes in MGZL patients seemed similar compared with that of NMGZL patients. On multivariable analyses, performance status and stage were highly prognostic for survival for all patients. Additionally, patients treated with ABVD+/−R had markedly inferior 2‐year PFS (22% versus 52%, P = 0.03) compared with DLBCL‐directed therapy (CHOP+/−R and DA‐EPOCH‐R), which persisted on Cox regression (hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–3.83; P = 0.04). Furthermore, rituximab was associated with improved PFS on multivariable analyses (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.18–0.69; P = 0.002). Collectively, GZL is a heterogeneous and likely more common entity and often with nonmediastinal presentation, whereas outcomes seem superior when treated with a rituximab‐based, DLBCL‐specific regimen. Am. J. Hematol. 90:778–783, 2015.

Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma with Primary Treatment Failure: Ultra‐high Risk Features and Benchmarking for Experimental Therapies

The outcomes of patients with DLBCL and primary treatment failure (PTF) in the rituximab era are unclear. We analyzed 331 patients with PTF, defined as primary progression while on upfront chemoimmunotherapy (PP), residual disease at the end of upfront therapy (RD) or relapse < 6 months from end of therapy (early relapse; ER). Median age was 58 years and response to salvage was 41.7%. Two‐year OS was 18.5% in PP, 30.6% in RD and 45.5% in ER. The presence of PP, intermediate‐high/high NCCN‐IPI at time of PTF or MYC translocation predicted 2‐year OS of 13.6% constituting ultra‐high risk (UHR) features. Among the 132 patients who underwent autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation, 2‐year OS was 74.3%, 59.6% and 10.7% for patients with 0,1 and 2–3 UHR features respectively. Patients with PTF and UHR features should be prioritized for clinical trials with newer agents and innovative cellular therapy.

De novo CD5+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Adverse outcomes with and without stem cell transplantation in a large, multicenter, rituximab treated cohort

De novo CD5+ diffuse large B‐cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are a distinct subgroup of DLBCL with poor prognosis. However the role of rituximab‐containing therapy and salvage stem cell transplantation in this patients’ population remain to be defined. We retrospectively reviewed clinical features and outcomes of 102 patients with de novo CD5+ DLBCL treated with rituximab‐containing therapy at nine different institutions. By Hans’ criteria, 64 patients had activated B‐cell (ABC) subtype, 24 germinal center B‐cell (GCB) subtype, and 14 were not evaluated. No patients had a myc translocation. Eighty‐three patients were treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R‐CHOP), 7 with rituximab, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R‐EPOCH), and 6 with R‐CHOP with methotrexate, 3 g/m2. The overall response rate to front‐line therapy was 85%. The 3‐year progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for all patients were 40 and 65%, respectively. The 3‐year PFS for ABC‐ and GCB‐subtypes was 34 and 45%, respectively. The 3‐year OS for ABC‐ and GCB‐subtypes was 62 and 67%, respectively. The median time to second treatment failure was 3 months and 1 month for ABC‐ and GCB‐subtypes, respectively. Twenty of 28 (71%) transplanted patients with autologous, allogeneic, or both, relapsed. This study confirms the poor prognosis of de novo CD5+ DLBCL in a large multi‐center cohort despite initial rituximab‐containing chemotherapy and suggests that stem cell transplantation fails to salvage the majority of these patients. Approaches to prevent recurrence and/or novel therapies for relapsed disease are needed for this subgroup of DLBCL patients. Am. J. Hematol. 91:395–399, 2016.

C-MYC–positive relapsed and refractory, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Impact of additional “hits” and outcomes with subsequent therapy

The impact of MYC proto‐oncogene, basic helix‐loop‐helix (MYC) translocations (with or without additional rearrangements involving the B‐cell lymphoma 2 [BCL2] or BCL6 genes) on the response to salvage therapy and survival in patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who experience primary treatment failure is not well defined.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT) in the Elderly: Myths, Controversies and Unknowns

The incidence of most hematological malignancies increases with age. Despite the higher incidence of hematological malignancies in the elderly, the geriatric population is poorly represented in the early oncology clinical trials that established the current standards of care. Hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), either upfront or at relapse, provides a potentially life-prolonging, often curative option for many patients with hematological malignancies and is considered the standard of care, at least for younger patients. Historically, the concern that older adults undergoing HCT may experience higher morbidity and transplant-related complications has limited the use of this potentially curative option to younger adults, particularly in allogeneic (allo-) HCT. There is growing evidence to support the feasibility, tolerability, and relatively similar effectiveness of both autologous and allo-HCT in the geriatric population. In the allo-HCT setting, nonmyeloablative/reduced-intensity conditioning (NMA/RIC) has expanded the spectrum of patients that can be considered for this approach. Overall survival is largely affected by disease stage, performance status, and comorbidities rather than by chronological age per se. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) is a promising tool that can uncover frequently undocumented vulnerabilities in an elderly transplant-eligible patient. Serial study of CGA throughout the peri-HCT period may help predict the short- and long-term impact of HCT on an older adult’s functional status and quality of life. Further research is needed to evaluate whether early intervention to improve such vulnerabilities can improve survival and quality of life of these older patients.