Zhanqing Shen

Assessment of cardiac function by three-dimensional echocardiography compared with conventional noninvasive methods.

BACKGROUND Reliable, serial, noninvasive quantitative estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction is essential for selecting and timing therapeutic interventions in patients with heart disease. Equilibrium radionuclide angiography is widely used for this purpose but has well-recognized limitations. Advantages of echocardiography over equilibrium radionuclide angiography include assessment of wall motion, valvular pathology, and cardiac hemodynamics, in addition to portability, lack of radiation exposure, and substantially lower cost. However, conventional echocardiographic techniques are limited by geometric assumptions, image positioning errors, and use of subjective visual methods. To overcome these limitations, a three-dimensional echocardiographic method was developed. This study compares ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography, quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography, and subjective two-dimensional echocardiographic visual estimation with that by equilibrium radionuclide angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS Fifty-one unselected patients with suspected heart disease underwent left ventricular ejection fraction determination by equilibrium radionuclide angiography and three-dimensional echocardiography using an interactive line-of-intersection display and a new algorithm, ventricular surface reconstruction, for volume computation. In 44 patients, ejection fractions were also estimated visually by experienced observers from two-dimensional echocardiography and by quantitative two-dimensional echocardiography using an apical biplane summation-of-disks algorithm. An excellent correlation was obtained between three-dimensional echocardiography and equilibrium radionuclide angiography (r = .94 to .97, SEE = 3.64% to 5.35%; limits of agreement, 10.3% to 13.3%) without significant underestimation or overestimation. SEE values and limits of agreement were twofold to threefold lower than corresponding values for all two-dimensional echocardiographic techniques. In addition, interobserver variability was significantly lower for the three-dimensional echocardiographic method (10.2%) than for the apical biplane summation-of-disks method (26.1%) and subjective visual estimation (33.3%). CONCLUSIONS Determination of ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography yields results comparable to those obtained by equilibrium radionuclide angiography and is substantially superior to all two-dimensional echocardiographic methods. Therefore, three-dimensional echocardiography may be used for accurate serial quantification of left ventricular function as an alternative to equilibrium radionuclide angiography.

Three-dimensional echocardiography: In vitro and in vivo validation of left ventricular mass and comparison with conventional echocardiographic methods

OBJECTIVES This study aimed to validate a method for mass computation in vitro and in vivo and to compare it with conventional methods. BACKGROUND Conventional echocardiographic methods of determining left ventricular mass are limited by assumptions of ventricular geometry and image plane positioning. To improve accuracy, we developed a three-dimensional echocardiographic method that uses nonparallel, nonintersecting short-axis planes and a polyhedral surface reconstruction algorithm for mass computation. METHODS Eleven fixed hearts were imaged by three-dimensional echocardiography, and mass was determined in vitro by multiplying the myocardial volume by the density of each heart and comparing it with the true mass. Mass at diastole and systole by three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was compared in vivo in 15 normal subjects. Ten subjects also underwent imaging by one- and two-dimensional echocardiography, and mass was determined by Penn convention, area-length and truncated ellipsoid algorithms. RESULTS In vitro results were r = 0.995, SEE 2.91 g, accuracy 3.47%. In vivo interobserver variability for systole and diastole was 16.7% to 27%, 14% to 18.1% and 6.3% to 12.8%, respectively, for one-, two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and was 7.5% for MRI at end-diastole. The latter two agreed closely with regard to diastolic mass (r = 0.895, SEE 11.1 g) and systolic mass (r = 0.926, SEE 9.2 g). These results were significantly better than correlations between MRI and the Penn convention (r = 0.725, SEE 25.6 g for diastole; r = 0.788, SEE 28.7 g for systole), area-length (r = 0.694, SEE 24.2 g for diastole; r = 0.717, SEE 28.2 g for systole) and truncated ellipsoid algorithms (r = 0.687, SEE 21.8 g for diastole; r = 0.710, SEE 24.5 g for systole). CONCLUSIONS Image plane positioning guidance and elimination of geometric assumptions by three-dimensional echocardiography achieve high accuracy for left ventricular mass determination in vitro. It is associated with higher correlations and lower standard errors than conventional methods in vivo.

Comparison of three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of volume, mass, and function in children with functionally single left ventricles with two-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging

Diminished systolic function or inappropriate hypertrophy are considered risk factors for outcome following the Fontan procedure. These parameters are difficult to assess in univentricular hearts that do not conform to the uniform shapes prescribed by conventional 2-dimensional imaging volume algorithms. Three-dimensional echocardiography requires no geometric assumptions and has been validated in both normal and distorted left ventricles. To assess the feasibility and accuracy of this technique in patients with univentricular hearts, we compared 2- and 3-dimensional echocardiographic estimates of ventricular volume, ejection fraction, and mass in patients with functionally single left ventricles with results obtained by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Twelve patients with functionally single left ventricles (6 months to 22 years) underwent examination by all 3 modalities. Correlation and agreement with MRI were calculated for volumes, ejection fraction, and mass. Three-dimensional echocardiographic comparison with MRI yielded a bias of 3.4 +/- 5.5 ml and 14.2 +/- 8.3 ml for systolic and diastolic volumes, respectively. Agreement analysis for mass showed a bias of 5.8 +/- 8.4 grams. Two-dimensional echocardiography showed less agreement for both volumes and mass (bias of -2.9 +/- 8.1, 2.9 +/- 10.4 ml and -8.3 +/- 12.0 g for volume and mass, respectively, p >0.05). Ejection fraction by 3-dimensional echocardiography showed significantly closer agreement with MRI (bias of 4.4 +/- 5.3%) than 2-dimensional echocardiography (bias of 8.5 +/- 10.3%, p = 0.04). Thus, 3-dimensional echocardiography provides estimates of ventricular volumes, ejection fraction, and mass that are comparable to MRI in this select group of patients with single ventricles of left ventricular morphology.