Zhao Guo
Georgia State University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Zhao Guo.
Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series | 2014
Daniel Huber; V. Silva Aguirre; Jaymie M. Matthews; Marc H. Pinsonneault; Eric Gaidos; R. A. García; S. Hekker; S. Mathur; B. Mosser; Guillermo Torres; Fabienne A. Bastien; Sarbani Basu; Timothy R. Bedding; W. J. Chaplin; Brice-Olivier Demory; Scott W. Fleming; Zhao Guo; Andrew W. Mann; Jason F. Rowe; Aldo M. Serenelli; Myron A. Smith; D. Stello
We present revised properties for 196,468 stars observed by the NASA Kepler mission and used in the analysis of Quarter 1-16 (Q1-Q16) data to detect and characterize transiting planets. The catalog is based on a compilation of literature values for atmospheric properties (temperature, surface gravity, and metallicity) derived from different observational techniques (photometry, spectroscopy, asteroseismology, and exoplanet transits), which were then homogeneously fitted to a grid of Dartmouth stellar isochrones. We use broadband photometry and asteroseismology to characterize 11,532 Kepler targets which were previously unclassified in the Kepler Input Catalog (KIC). We report the detection of oscillations in 2762 of these targets, classifying them as giant stars and increasing the number of known oscillating giant stars observed by Kepler by ~20% to a total of ~15,500 stars. Typical uncertainties in derived radii and masses are ~40% and ~20%, respectively, for stars with photometric constraints only, and 5%-15% and ~10% for stars based on spectroscopy and/or asteroseismology, although these uncertainties vary strongly with spectral type and luminosity class. A comparison with the Q1-Q12 catalog shows a systematic decrease in radii of M dwarfs, while radii for K dwarfs decrease or increase depending on the Q1-Q12 provenance (KIC or Yonsei-Yale isochrones). Radii of F-G dwarfs are on average unchanged, with the exception of newly identified giants. The Q1-Q16 star properties catalog is a first step toward an improved characterization of all Kepler targets to support planet-occurrence studies.
The Astronomical Journal | 2012
Douglas R. Gies; S. J. Williams; Rachel A. Matson; Zhao Guo; S. M. Thomas; Jerome A. Orosz; Geraldine J. Peters
We present the first results of a Kepler survey of 41 eclipsing binaries that we undertook to search for third star companions. Such tertiaries will periodically alter the eclipse timings through light travel time and dynamical effects. We discuss the prevalence of starspots and pulsation among these binaries and how these phenomena influence the eclipse times. There is no evidence of short-period companions (P < 700 days) among this sample, but we do find evidence for long-term timing variations in 14 targets (34%). We argue that this finding is consistent with the presence of tertiary companions among a significant fraction of the targets, especially if many have orbits measured in decades. This result supports the idea that the formation of close binaries involves the deposition of angular momentum into the orbital motion of a third star.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Zhao Guo; Douglas R. Gies; Rachel A. Matson; Antonio García Hernández
KIC 9851944 is a short period (
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Zhao Guo; Douglas R. Gies; Rachel A. Matson; Antonio García Hernández; Zhanwen Han; Xuefei Chen
P=2.16
The Astronomical Journal | 2015
D. R. Gies; Rachel A. Matson; Zhao Guo; Kathryn V. Lester; Jerome A. Orosz; Geraldine J. Peters
days) eclipsing binary in the {\it Kepler} field of view. By combining the analysis of {\it Kepler} photometry and phase resolved spectra from Kitt Peak National Observatory and Lowell Observatory, we determine the atmospheric and physical parameters of both stars. The two components have very different radii (
The Astrophysical Journal | 2016
Zhao Guo; Douglas R. Gies; Jim Fuller
2.27R_{\odot}
The Astrophysical Journal | 2013
Douglas R. Gies; Zhao Guo; Steve B. Howell; Martin Still; Tabetha S. Boyajian; Abe J. Hoekstra; Kian J. Jek; Daryll LaCourse; Troy Winarski
,
The Astrophysical Journal | 2015
Rachel A. Matson; Douglas R. Gies; Zhao Guo; Samuel N. Quinn; Lars A. Buchhave; David W. Latham; Steve B. Howell; Jason F. Rowe
3.19R_{\odot}
The Astronomical Journal | 2016
Rachel A. Matson; Douglas R. Gies; Zhao Guo; Jerome A. Orosz
) but close masses (
The Astrophysical Journal | 2017
Zhao Guo; Douglas R. Gies; Rachel A. Matson
1.76 M_{\odot}