Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Zhengmao Ye is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Zhengmao Ye.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2013

Defect reduction for semiconductor memory applications using jet and flash imprint lithography

Zhengmao Ye; Kang Luo; J. W. Irving; Xiaoming Lu; Wei Zhang; Brian Fletcher; Weijun Liu; Matt Shafran; Saul Lee; Whitney Longsine; Van N. Truskett; Frank Y. Xu; Dwayne L. LaBrake; Douglas J. Resnick; S. V. Sreenivasan

Imprint lithography has been shown to be an effective technique for replication of nano-scale features. Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography (J-FIL) involves the field-by-field deposition and exposure of a low viscosity resist deposited by jetting technology onto the substrate. The patterned mask is lowered into the fluid which then quickly flows into the relief patterns in the mask by capillary action. Following this filling step, the resist is crosslinked under UV radiation, and then the mask is removed leaving a patterned resist on the substrate. Acceptance of imprint lithography for manufacturing will require demonstration that it can attain defect levels commensurate with the defect specifications of high end memory devices. Typical defectivity targets are on the order of 0.10/cm2. In previous studies, we have focused on defects such as random non-fill defects occurring during the resist filling process and repeater defects caused by interactions with particles on the substrate. In this work, we attempted to identify the critical imprint defect types using a mask with NAND Flash-like patterns at dimensions as small as 26nm. The two key defect types identified were line break defects induced by small particulates and airborne contaminants which result in local adhesion failure. After identification, the root cause of the defect was determined, and corrective measures were taken to either eliminate or reduce the defect source. As a result, we have been able to reduce defectivity levels by more than three orders of magnitude in only 12 months and are now achieving defectivity adders as small as 2 adders per lot of wafers.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2010

High volume jet and flash imprint lithography for discrete track patterned media

Zhengmao Ye; Cynthia B. Brooks; Paul Hellebrekers; Scott Carden; Dwayne L. LaBrake

The Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography (J-FIL) process uses drop dispensing of UV curable resists for high resolution patterning. Several applications, including patterned media, are better, and more economically served by a full substrate patterning process since the alignment requirements are minimal. Patterned media is particularly challenging because of the aggressive feature sizes necessary to achieve storage densities required for manufacturing beyond the current technology of perpendicular recording. In this paper, the key process steps for the application of J-FIL to pattern media fabrication are reviewed with special attention to the vapor adhesion layer and imprint performance at >300 disk per hour.


Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering | 2009

Jet and flash imprint lithography for the fabrication of patterned media drives

Gerard M. Schmid; Cynthia B. Brooks; Zhengmao Ye; Steve Johnson; Dwayne L. LaBrake; S. V. Sreenivasan; Douglas J. Resnick

The ever-growing demand for hard drives with greater storage density has motivated a technology shift from continuous magnetic media to patterned media hard disks, which are expected to be implemented in future generations of hard disk drives to provide data storage at densities exceeding 1012 bits per square inch. Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography (J-FILTM) technology has been employed to pattern the hard disk substrates. This paper discusses the infrastructure required to enable J-FIL in high-volume manufacturing; namely, fabrication of master templates, template replication, high-volume imprinting with precisely controlled residual layers, dual-sided imprinting and defect inspection. Imprinting of disks is demonstrated with substrate throughput currently as high as 180 disks/hour (dual-sided). These processes are applied to patterning hard disk substrates with both discrete tracks and bit-patterned designs.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2014

High-throughput jet and flash imprint lithography for advanced semiconductor memory

Niyaz Khusnatdinov; Zhengmao Ye; Kang Luo; Tim Stachowiak; Xiaoming Lu; J. W. Irving; Matt Shafran; Whitney Longsine; Matthew Traub; Van N. Truskett; Brian Fletcher; Weijun Liu; Frank Y. Xu; Dwayne L. LaBrake; S. V. Sreenivasan

Imprint lithography has been shown to be an effective technique for replication of nano-scale features. Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography (J-FIL) involves the field-by-field deposition and exposure of a low viscosity resist deposited by jetting technology onto the substrate. The patterned mask is lowered into the fluid which then quickly flows into the relief patterns in the mask by capillary action. Following this filling step, the resist is crosslinked under UV radiation, and then the mask is removed, leaving a patterned resist on the substrate. Non-fill defectivity must always be considered within the context of process throughput. Processing steps such as resist exposure time and mask/wafer separation are well understood, and typical times for the steps are on the order of 0.10 to 0.20 seconds. To achieve a total process throughput of 20 wafers per hour (wph), it is necessary to complete the fluid fill step in 1.0 seconds, making it the key limiting step in an imprint process. Recently, defect densities of less than 1.0/cm2 have been achieved at a fill time of 1.2 seconds by reducing resist drop size and optimizing the drop pattern. There are several parameters that can impact resist filling. Key parameters include resist drop volume (smaller is better), system controls (which address drop spreading after jetting), Design for Imprint or DFI (to accelerate drop spreading) and material engineering (to promote wetting between the resist and underlying adhesion layer). In addition, it is mandatory to maintain fast filling, even for edge field imprinting. This paper addresses the improvements made with reduced drop volume and enhanced surface wetting to demonstrate that fast filling can be achieved for both full fields and edge fields. By incorporating the changes to the process noted above, we are now attaining fill times of 1 second with non-fill defectivity of ~ 0.1 defects/cm2.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2011

Defect reduction of high-density full-field patterns in jet and flash imprint lithography

Lovejeet Singh; Kang Luo; Zhengmao Ye; Frank Y. Xu; Gaddi Haase; David Curran; Dwayne L. LaBrake; Douglas J. Resnick; S. V. Sreenivasan

Imprint lithography has been shown to be an effective technique for replication of nano-scale features. Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography (J-FIL) involves the field-by-field deposition and exposure of a low viscosity resist deposited by jetting technology onto the substrate. The patterned mask is lowered into the fluid which then quickly flows into the relief patterns in the mask by capillary action. Following this filling step, the resist is crosslinked under UV radiation, and then the mask is removed leaving a patterned resist on the substrate. Acceptance of imprint lithography for manufacturing will require demonstration that it can attain defect levels commensurate with the defect specifications of high end memory devices. Typical defectivity targets are on the order of 0.10/cm2. This work summarizes the results of defect inspections focusing on two key defect types; random non-fill defects occurring during the resist filling process and repeater defects caused by interactions with particles on the substrate. Non-fill defectivity must always be considered within the context of process throughput. The key limiting throughput step in an imprint process is resist filling time. As a result, it is critical to characterize the filling process by measuring non-fill defectivity as a function of fill time. Repeater defects typically have two main sources; mask defects and particle related defects. Previous studies have indicated that soft particles tend to cause non-repeating defects. Hard particles, on the other hand, can cause either resist plugging or mask damage. In this work, an Imprio 500 twenty wafer per hour (wph) development tool was used to study both defect types. By carefully controlling the volume of inkjetted resist, optimizing the drop pattern and controlling the resist fluid front during spreading, fill times of 1.5 seconds were achieved with non-fill defect levels of approximately 1.2/cm2. Longevity runs were used to study repeater defects and a nickel contamination was identified as the key source of particle induced repeater defects.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2011

High density patterned media fabrication using Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography

Zhengmao Ye; Cynthia B. Brooks; Logan Simpson; John Fretwell; Scott Carden; Paul Hellebrekers; Dwayne L. LaBrake; Douglas J. Resnick; S. V. Sreenivasan

The Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography (J-FIL®) process uses drop dispensing of UV curable resists for high resolution patterning. Several applications, including patterned media, are better, and more economically served by a full substrate patterning process since the alignment requirements are minimal. Patterned media is particularly challenging because of the aggressive feature sizes necessary to achieve storage densities required for manufacturing beyond the current technology of perpendicular recording. In this paper, the key process steps for the application of J-FIL to pattern media fabrication are reviewed with special attention to substrate cleaning, vapor adhesion of the adhesion layer and imprint performance at >300 disk per hour. Also discussed are recent results for imprinting discrete track patterns at half pitches of 24nm and bit patterned media patterns at densities of 1 Tb/in2.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2016

Defectivity and particle reduction for mask life extension, and imprint mask replication for high-volume semiconductor manufacturing

Keiji Emoto; Fumio Sakai; Chiaki Sato; Yukio Takabayashi; Hitoshi Nakano; Tsuneo Takabayashi; Kiyohito Yamamoto; Tadashi Hattori; Mitsuru Hiura; Toshiaki Ando; Yoshio Kawanobe; Hisanobu Azuma; Takehiko Iwanaga; Jin Choi; Ali Aghili; Chris Jones; J. W. Irving; Brian Fletcher; Zhengmao Ye

Imprint lithography has been shown to be an effective technique for replication of nano-scale features. Jet and Flash* Imprint Lithography (J-FIL*) involves the field-by-field deposition and exposure of a low viscosity resist deposited by jetting technology onto the substrate. The patterned mask is lowered into the fluid which then quickly flows into the relief patterns in the mask by capillary action. Following this filling step, the resist is crosslinked under UV radiation, and then the mask is removed, leaving a patterned resist on the substrate. Criteria specific to any lithographic process for the semiconductor industry include overlay, throughput and defectivity. The purpose of this paper is to describe the technology advancements made in the reduction of particle adders in an imprint tool and introduce the new mask replication tool that will enable the fabrication of replica masks with added residual image placement errors suitable for memory devices with half pitches smaller than 15nm. Hard particles on a wafer or mask create the possibility of creating a permanent defect on the mask that can impact device yield and mask life. By using material methods to reduce particle shedding and by introducing an air curtain system, test stand results demonstrate the potential for extending mask life to better than 1000 wafers. Additionally, a new replication tool, the FPA-1100 NR2 is introduced. Mask chuck flatness simulation results were also performed and demonstrate that residual image placement errors can be reduced to as little as 1nm.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2016

High throughput Jet and Flash Imprint Lithography for semiconductor memory applications

Wei Zhang; Brian Fletcher; Ecron Thompson; Weijun Liu; Tim Stachowiak; Niyaz Khusnatdinov; J. W. Irving; Whitney Longsine; Matthew Traub; Van N. Truskett; Dwayne L. LaBrake; Zhengmao Ye

Imprint lithography has been shown to be an effective technique for replication of nano-scale features. Jet and Flash* Imprint Lithography (J-FIL*) involves the field-by-field deposition and exposure of a low viscosity resist deposited by jetting technology onto the substrate. The patterned mask is lowered into the fluid which then quickly flows into the relief patterns in the mask by capillary action. Following this filling step, the resist is crosslinked under UV radiation, and then the mask is removed, leaving a patterned resist on the substrate. There are two critical components to meeting throughput requirements for imprint lithography. Using a similar approach to what is already done for many deposition and etch processes, imprint stations can be clustered to enhance throughput. The FPA-1200NZ2C is a four station cluster system designed for high volume manufacturing. For a single station, throughput includes overhead, resist dispense, resist fill time (or spread time), exposure and separation. Resist exposure time and mask/wafer separation are well understood processing steps with typical durations on the order of 0.10 to 0.20 seconds. To achieve a total process throughput of 15 wafers per hour (wph) for a single station, it is necessary to complete the fluid fill step in 1.5 seconds. For a throughput of 20 wph, fill time must be reduced to only one second. There are several parameters that can impact resist filling. Key parameters include resist drop volume (smaller is better), system controls (which address drop spreading after jetting), Design for Imprint or DFI (to accelerate drop spreading) and material engineering (to promote wetting between the resist and underlying adhesion layer). In addition, it is mandatory to maintain fast filling, even for edge field imprinting. In this paper, we address the improvements made in all of these parameters to enable a 1.50 second filling process for a sub-20nm device like pattern and have demonstrated this capability for both full fields and edge fields.


Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology. B. Nanotechnology and Microelectronics: Materials, Processing, Measurement, and Phenomena | 2010

Defect analysis for patterned media

Zhengmao Ye; John Fretwell; Kang Luo; Steven Ha; Gerard M. Schmid; Dwayne L. LaBrake; Douglas J. Resnick; S. V. Sreenivasan

Imprint lithography has been shown to be an effective technique for the replication of nanoscale features. Acceptance of imprint lithography for manufacturing will require a demonstration of defect levels commensurate with cost-effective device production. This article summarizes the results of defect inspections of hard disks patterned using jet and flash imprint lithography (J-FIL™). This work presents a methodology for automated pattern inspection and defect classification for imprint-patterned media. Candela CS20 and 6120 tools from KLA-Tencor map the optical properties of the disk surface, producing high-resolution grayscale images of surface reflectivity and scattered light. Defects that have been identified in this manner are further characterized according to the morphology. The imprint process was tested after optimizing both the disk cleaning and adhesion layer processes that precede imprinting. Two extended imprint runs were performed and both the defect types and trends are reported.Imprint lithography has been shown to be an effective technique for the replication of nanoscale features. Acceptance of imprint lithography for manufacturing will require a demonstration of defect levels commensurate with cost-effective device production. This article summarizes the results of defect inspections of hard disks patterned using jet and flash imprint lithography (J-FIL™). This work presents a methodology for automated pattern inspection and defect classification for imprint-patterned media. Candela CS20 and 6120 tools from KLA-Tencor map the optical properties of the disk surface, producing high-resolution grayscale images of surface reflectivity and scattered light. Defects that have been identified in this manner are further characterized according to the morphology. The imprint process was tested after optimizing both the disk cleaning and adhesion layer processes that precede imprinting. Two extended imprint runs were performed and both the defect types and trends are reported.


Proceedings of SPIE | 2012

Imprint process performance for patterned media at densities greater than 1Tb/in2

Zhengmao Ye; Scott Carden; Paul Hellebrekers; Dwayne L. LaBrake; Douglas J. Resnick; M. Melliar-Smith; S. V. Sreenivasan

The use of bit pattern media beyond densities of 1Tb/in2 requires the ability to pattern dimensions to sub 10nm. This paper describes the techniques used to reach these dimensions with imprint lithography and avoid such challenges as pattern collapse, by developing improved resist materials with higher strength, and utilizing a reverse tone J-FIL/R process.

Collaboration


Dive into the Zhengmao Ye's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

S. V. Sreenivasan

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Frank Y. Xu

University of Texas System

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Niyaz Khusnatdinov

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Cynthia B. Brooks

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Gerard M. Schmid

University of Texas at Austin

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Van N. Truskett

University of Texas System

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge