Zhimin Shao

Trastuzumab in the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials.

Background Adjuvant trastuzumab therapy has yielded conflicting results for overall survival, concerns about central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, and questions about optimal schedule. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to assess the benefits of concurrent or sequential trastuzumab with adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer patients with HER2-positive tumors. Methods Computerized and manual searches were performed to identify randomized clinical trials comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer patients. Odds ratios were used to estimate the association between the addition of trastuzumab to adjuvant chemotherapy and various survival outcomes. The fixed-effects or random-effects model was used to combine data. Findings With six eligible studies identified, this analysis demonstrated that patients with HER2-positive breast cancer derived benefit in disease-free survival, overall survival, locoregional recurrence and distant recurrence (all P<0.001) from the addition of trastuzumab to adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas trastuzumab did worse in CNS recurrence as compared to the control group (P = 0.018). Furthermore, concomitant use of trastuzumab significantly lowered the hazard of death (P<0.001) but bore a higher incidence of CNS recurrence (P = 0.010), while statistical significance failed to be discerned for either overall survival (P = 0.069) or CNS metastasis (P = 0.374) between the sequential and observation arms. Conclusion This analysis verifies the efficacy of trastuzumab in the adjuvant setting. Additionally, our findings indirectly corroborate the superiority of concurrent trastuzumab to sequential use and also illuminate that prolonged survival is the possible reason for the higher incidence of CNS with trastuzumab versus observation.

Combination of everolimus with trastuzumab plus paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (BOLERO-1) : a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND mTOR inhibition reverses trastuzumab resistance via the hyperactivated PIK/AKT/mTOR pathway due to PTEN loss, by sensitising PTEN-deficient tumours to trastuzumab. The BOLERO-1 study assessed the efficacy and safety of adding everolimus to trastuzumab and paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. METHODS In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind trial, patients were enrolled across 141 sites in 28 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, with locally assessed HER2-positive advanced breast cancer, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, who had not received previous trastuzumab or chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer within 12 months of randomisation, had measurable disease as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or bone lesions in the absence of measurable disease, without previous systemic treatment for advanced disease except endocrine therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with an interactive voice and web response system to receive either 10 mg everolimus once a day orally or placebo plus weekly trastuzumab intravenously at 4 mg/kg loading dose on day 1 with subsequent weekly doses of 2 mg/kg of each 4 week cycle plus paclitaxel intravenously at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 4 week cycle. Randomisation was stratified according to previous use of trastuzumab and visceral metastasis. Patients and investigators were masked to the assigned treatments. Identity of experimental treatments was concealed by use of everolimus and placebo that were identical in packaging, labelling, appearance, and administration schedule. The two primary objectives were investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the full study population and in the subset of patients with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer at baseline; the latter was added during the course of the study, before unmasking based on new clinical and biological findings from other studies. All efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat population. Enrolment for this trial is closed and results of the final progression-free survival analyses are presented here. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00876395. FINDINGS Between Sept 10, 2009, and Dec 16, 2012, 719 patients were randomly assigned to receive everolimus (n=480) or placebo (n=239). Median follow-up was 41·3 months (IQR 35·4-46·6). In the full population, median progression-free survival was 14·95 months (95% CI 14·55-17·91) with everolimus versus 14·49 months (12·29-17·08) with placebo (hazard ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·73-1·08; p=0·1166). In the HR-negative subpopulation (n=311), median progression-free survival with everolimus was 20·27 months (95% CI 14·95-24·08) versus 13·08 months (10·05-16·56) with placebo (hazard ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·48-0·91; p=0·0049); however, the protocol-specified significance threshold (p=0·0044) was not crossed. The most common adverse events with everolimus were stomatitis (314 [67%] of 472 patients in the everolimus group vs 77 [32%] of 238 patients in the placebo group), diarrhoea (267 [57%] vs 111 [47%] patients), and alopecia (221 [47%] vs 125 [53%]). The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events in the everolimus group versus the placebo group were neutropenia (117 [25%] vs 35 [15%]), stomatitis (59 [13%] vs three [1%]), anaemia (46 [10%] vs six [3%]) and diarrhoea (43 [9%] vs 10 [4%]) On-treatment adverse event-related deaths were reported in 17 (4%) patients in the everolimus group and none in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION Although progression-free survival was not significantly different between groups in the full analysis population, the 7·2 months prolongation we noted with the addition of everolimus in the HR-negative, HER2-positive population warrants further investigation, even if it did not meet prespecified criteria for significance. The safety profile was generally consistent with what was previously reported in BOLERO-3. Proactive monitoring and early management of adverse events in patients given everolimus and chemotherapy is crucial. FUNDING Novartis Pharmaceuticals.

Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Aromatase inhibitors are a standard of care for hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We investigated whether the selective oestrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant could improve progression-free survival compared with anastrozole in postmenopausal patients who had not received previous endocrine therapy. METHODS In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind trial, we recruited eligible patients with histologically confirmed oestrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive, or both, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer from 113 academic hospitals and community centres in 20 countries. Eligible patients were endocrine therapy-naive, with WHO performance status 0-2, and at least one measurable or non-measurable lesion. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to fulvestrant (500 mg intramuscular injection; on days 0, 14, 28, then every 28 days thereafter) or anastrozole (1 mg orally daily) using a computer-generated randomisation scheme. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1·1, intervention by surgery or radiotherapy because of disease deterioration, or death from any cause, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of randomised treatment (including placebo). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01602380. FINDINGS Between Oct 17, 2012, and July 11, 2014, 524 patients were enrolled to this study. Of these, 462 patients were randomised (230 to receive fulvestrant and 232 to receive anastrozole). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the fulvestrant group than in the anastrozole group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·797, 95% CI 0·637-0·999, p=0·0486). Median progression-free survival was 16·6 months (95% CI 13·83-20·99) in the fulvestrant group versus 13·8 months (11·99-16·59) in the anastrozole group. The most common adverse events were arthralgia (38 [17%] in the fulvestrant group vs 24 [10%] in the anastrozole group) and hot flushes (26 [11%] in the fulvestrant group vs 24 [10%] in the anastrozole group). 16 (7%) of 228 patients in in the fulvestrant group and 11 (5%) of 232 patients in the anastrozole group discontinued because of adverse events. INTERPRETATION Fulvestrant has superior efficacy and is a preferred treatment option for patients with hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have not received previous endocrine therapy compared with a third-generation aromatase inhibitor, a standard of care for first-line treatment of these patients. FUNDING AstraZeneca.

Prognostic role of p27Kip1 and apoptosis in human breast cancer.

SummaryHuman breast carcinoma is biologically heterogeneous, and its clinical course may vary from an indolent slowly progressive one to a course associated with rapid progression and metastatic spread. It is important to establish prognostic factors which will define subgroups of patients with low vs high risk of recurrence so as to better define the need for additional therapy. Additional characterization of the molecular make-up of breast cancer phenotypes should provide important insights into the biology of breast cancer. In the present study, we investigated apoptosis, expression of p27Kip1 and p53 retrospectively in 181 human breast cancer specimens. In addition, their relevance to the biological behaviour of breast cancer was examined. Our studies found a significant association among high histological grade, high p53, low apoptosis and low p27. Our results also demonstrated that, in human breast cancer, low levels of p27 and apoptotic index (AI) strongly correlated with the presence of lymph node metastasis and decreased patient survival. In node-negative patients, however, p27 also had prognostic value for relapse-free and overall survival in multivariate analysis. Furthermore p27 and AI had predictive value for the benefits of chemotherapy. These latter observations should prompt prospective randomized studies designed to investigate the predictive role of p27 and AI in determining who should receive chemotherapy in node-negative patients.

18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET/CT: A Potential Tool for Predicting Primary Endocrine Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer

Although endocrine therapy is an effective method to treat estrogen receptor (ER)–positive breast cancer, approximately 30%–40% of all hormone receptor–positive tumors display de novo resistance. The aim of our current study was to analyze whether 18F-labeled fluoromisonidazole (1-(2-nitro-1-imidazolyl)-2-hydroxy-3-fluoropropane [18F-FMISO]) PET/CT could predict primary resistance to hormonal therapy in ER-positive breast cancer. Methods: Postmenopausal women who had ER-α–positive breast cancer, stages II–IV, and had never received prior endocrine therapy were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients underwent both 18F-FDG and 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans before and after treatment. The hottest 18F-FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) in the tumor foci, the SUVs at 2 and 4 h, and the TBR2 h and TBR4 h for the target lesions were calculated (TBR2 h = SUV2 hT/SUV2 hB and TBR4 h = SUV4 hT/SUV4 hB [TBR is the tumor-to-background ratio]). Clinical outcomes of primary endocrine therapy with letrozole were evaluated according to the criteria of the World Health Organization after at least 3 mo of treatment. Immunohistochemistry for markers of proliferation (Ki67) and hypoxia-induced factor 1α was performed on a subset of tumors that had undergone biopsy or surgery. Pearson and Spearman analysis was used to determine the correlation between the parameters of 18F-FDG and 18F-FMISO uptake and clinical or immunohistochemistry outcomes with a 0.01 threshold for statistical significance. Results: A total of 45 lesions (13 primary, 32 metastatic) from 20 patients met the inclusion criteria in this study. Baseline 18F-FDG and 18F-FMISO PET/CT scans were obtained for 33 lesions from 16 patients. The correlation between baseline 18F-FDG uptake and clinical outcome was weak and did not reach statistical significance (r = 0.37, P = 0.031). However, there was a significantly positive correlation between baseline 18F-FMISO uptake (SUV2 hT, TBR2 h, SUV4 hT, and TBR4 h) and clinical outcomes after ≥3 mo of primary endocrine therapy with letrozole (r = 0.77, 0.76, 0.71, and 0.78, respectively; P < 0.0001). The application of a TBR4 h cutoff of ≥1.2 allowed the prediction of 88% of the cases of progressive disease (15/17). Despite poor correlation between 18F-FMISO uptake and hypoxia-induced factor 1α expression, a marginal positive correlation between TBR4 h and Ki67 expression was measured (r = 0.51, P = 0.011) in a subset of malignant lesions acquired by biopsy or surgery. Conclusion: 18F-FMISO PET/CT can be used to predict primary endocrine resistance in ER-positive breast cancer.

FOXC1, a target of polycomb, inhibits metastasis of breast cancer cells

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins have recently been shown related to cancer development. The PcG protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate and breast cancers, and has been identified as a molecular marker in breast cancer. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanism by which PcG proteins regulate cancer progression and malignant metastasis is still unclear. PcG proteins methylate H3K27 in undifferentiated epithelial cells, resulting in the repression of differentiation genes such as HOX. FOXC1 is a member of the Forkhead box transcription factor family, which plays an important role in differentiation, and is involved in eye development. We discovered in this study that the expression of FOXC1 gene was negatively correlated to that of PcG genes, i.e., Bmi1, EZH2, and SUZ12, in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. To investigate the regulatory effects of PcG proteins on FOXC1 gene, the two cell lines were transfected with either expression plasmids or siRNA plasmids of Bmi1, EZH2, and SUZ12, and we found that PcGs, especially EZH2, could repress the transcription of FOXC1 gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay showed that histone methylation and acetylation modifications played critical roles in this regulatory process. When FOXC1 was stably transfected into MDA-MB-231 cells, the migration and invasion of the cells were repressed. Moreover, the tumorigenicity and the spontaneous metastatic capability regulated by FOXC1 were determined by using an orthotropic xenograft tumor model of athymic mice with the FOXC1-MDA-MB-231HM and the GFP-MDA-MB-231HM cells, and the results showed that FOXC1 in MDA-MB-231HM cells inhibited migration and invasion in vitro and reduced the pulmonary metastasis in vivo. Data presented in this report contribute to the understanding of the mechanisms by which EZH2 participates in tumor development.

The efficacy of zoledronic acid in breast cancer adjuvant therapy: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND The effect of zoledronic acid in breast cancer adjuvant therapy concerning improvement of patient survival has yet to be confirmed. We performed a meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomised controlled trials with the aim of accurate evaluation between clinical outcome and the association of the addition of zoledronic acid to adjuvant therapy. METHODS We searched PubMed (from 1966 to present) and online abstracts from the proceeding Annual Meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (years 1992-2010) and online abstracts from San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (years 2004-2010). A total of five eligible studies including 3676 subjects and 3678 controls met our search criteria and were evaluated. Random and fixed-effects meta-analytical models were used where indicated, and between-study heterogeneity was assessed. The primary study end-points were the disease free survival (DFS). Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS), distant or loco-regional recurrence free survival and bone metastasis free survival. FINDINGS Compared with the control arm, adjuvant breast cancer treatment with zoledronic acid did not significantly improve overall survival, disease free survival, bone metastasis free survival, distant and locoregional recurrence free survival. However, in the postmenopausal subgroup, the addition of zoledronic acid to standard therapy could significantly improve DFS (relative risk (RR) = 0.763, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.658-0.884, p < 0.001) and reduce the risk of distant (RR = 0.744, 95%CI 0.611-0.906, p = 0.003) and locoregional recurrence (RR = 0.508, 95%CI 0.340-0.760, p = 0.001). INTERPRETATION Adjuvant zoledronic acid did not significantly improve the prognosis of breast cancer patients. Due to the highly variable definitions of menopause utilised in different studies, we hypothesise that zoledronic acid may have a potential effect on postmenopausal patients. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the value of adjuvant treatment of zoledronic acid in premenopausal counterparts, differing disease stages and various pathological types of breast cancer.

A multi-centre randomised trial comparing ultrasound vs mammography for screening breast cancer in high-risk Chinese women

Background:Chinese women tend to have small and dense breasts and ultrasound is a common method for breast cancer screening in China. However, its efficacy and cost comparing with mammography has not been evaluated in randomised trials.Methods:At 14 breast centres across China during 2008–2010, 13 339 high-risk women aged 30–65 years were randomised to be screened by mammography alone, ultrasound alone, or by both methods at enrolment and 1-year follow-up.Results:A total of 12 519 and 8692 women underwent the initial and second screenings, respectively. Among the 30 cancers (of which 15 were stage 0/I) detected, 5 (0.72/1000) were in the mammography group, 11 (1.51/1000) in the ultrasound group, and 14 (2.02/1000) in the combined group (P=0.12). In the combined group, ultrasound detected all the 14 cancers, whereas mammography detected 8, making ultrasound more sensitive (100 vs 57.1%, P=0.04) with a better diagnostic accuracy (0.999 vs 0.766, P=0.01). There was no difference between mammography and ultrasound in specificity (100 vs 99.9%, P=0.51) and positive predictive value (72.7 vs 70.0%; P=0.87). To detect one cancer, the costs of ultrasound, mammography, and combined modality were

Circulating tumor cells predict progression-free and overall survival in Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer, HER2-positive or triple-negative (CBCSG004): a multicenter, double-blind, prospective trial

7876,

Fenofibrate induces apoptosis of triple-negative breast cancer cells via activation of NF-κB pathway

45 253, and