Zsuzsanna Cs. Gyarmati

Different forms of antiparallel stacking of hydrogen-bonded antidromic rings in the solid state: Polymorphism with virtually the same unit cell and two-dimensional isostructurality with alternating layers

As a continuation of a systematic structural analysis of 2-hydroxycycloalkanecarboxylic acids and their carboxamide analogs, the effects of antidromic rings [Jeffrey & Saenger (1991). Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structures. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag] upon the layer stacking of cyclopentane and cycloheptane derivatives are compared. Determination of the structure of trans-2-hydroxycycloheptanecarboxylic acid (2) led to the discovery of two polymorphs with virtually the same unit cell [Kalman et al. (2003). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 34-35]. (i) The layer stacking of the antidromic rings for the whole single crystal is antiparallel (2b). (ii) The antidromic rings and the 21 axis are parallel (2a), consequently the domains of the single crystal must be antiparallel. While their polymorphism is solvent-controlled, they illustrate a novel form of two-dimensional isostructurality. Antiparallel layer stacking is again demonstrated by trans-2-hydroxycycloheptanecarboxamide (3) (space group Pbca). It is built up from layers isostructural with those in the homologous trans-2-hydroxycyclopentanecarboxamide (4) [Kalman et al. (2001). Acta Cryst. B57, 539-550], but in this structure (space group Pca21) the layers are stacked in parallel mode. Similar to (2a) and (2b), the antiparallel layer stacking in (3) versus their parallel array in (4) illustrates the two-dimensional isostructurality with alternating layer orientations. Although (3) and (4) display isostructurality, they are not isomorphous.

Novel, predicted patterns of supramolecular self-assembly, afforded by tetrameric R44(12) rings of C2 symmetry in the crystal structures of 2-hydroxy-1-cyclopentanecarboxylic acid, 2-hydroxy-1-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid and 2-hydroxy-1-cycloheptanecarboxylic acid

Determination of the crystal structures of the homologous (1R*,2R*)-trans-2-hydroxy-1-cyclopentanecarboxylic acid (5T), (1R*,2S*)-cis-2-hydroxy-1-cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (6C) and (1R*,2S*)-cis-2-hydroxy-1-cycloheptanecarboxylic acid (7C) proved a predicted pattern of supramolecular close packing. The prediction was based on the common features observed in the crystal structures of six related 2-hydroxy-1-cyclopentanecarboxylic acids and analogous carboxamides [Kálmán et al. (2001). Acta Cryst. B57, 539-550]. This pattern is characterized by tetrameric R(4)(4)(12) rings of C(2) symmetry formed from dimeric R(2)(2)(12) rings. The C(2) symmetry of such tetramers is not common in the literature, usually they have C(i) symmetry. Both types of tetramers are formed from dimers with similar or opposite orientation. The R(2)(2)(12) dimers differ in their hydrogen bonds. In 5T the monomers are joined by a pair of O1[bond]H...O2[double bond]C bonds, whereas in 7C they are joined by a pair of O3[bond]H...O1-H bonds. In 6C 60% of the disordered R(2)(2)(12) dimers are similar to those in 7C, while 40% resemble those in 5T. Apart from these hydrogen-bonding differences and the ring-size differences, the three crystals exhibit isostructurality.

Cis-7-Azabicyclo[4.2.0]octan-8-one

Under the strain of the quasi-planar,B-lactam moiety, the rigid cyclohexane ring in the title compound, C7H11NO, can assume either a flexible boat form (77%) or a flexible half-chair form (23%). These two forms can be present simultaneously. The racemic crystals, isostructural with the cis-6-azabicyclo[3.2.0]heptan-7-one homologue [Reck et al. (1990). Acta Cryst. C46, 720-722], are characterized by N-H...O=C hydrogen bonds that are formed along the screw axes of the similar monoclinic unit cell.

Predictable close-packing similarities between cis- and trans-2-hydroxy-1-cyclooctanecarboxylic acids and trans-2-hydroxy-1-cyclooctanecarboxamide.

In order to extend the experimental data already available on the close packing of cyclopentanes substituted with vicinal COX (X = OH, NH(2)) and OH groups to the analogous cyclohexanes, cycloheptanes and cyclooctanes, (1R*,2S*)-cis-2-hydroxy-1-cyclooctanecarboxylic acid (8C), (1R*,2R*)-trans-2-hydroxy-1-cyclooctanecarboxylic acid (8T) and (1R*,2R*)-trans-2-hydroxy-1-cyclooctanecarboxamide (8T*) were subjected to X-ray crystal structure analysis. In 8T and 8T*, the hydrogen bonds form infinite ribbons of dimers joined by R(2)(2)(12) rings with C(i) symmetry. Two types of dimer alternate along each ribbon. The dimers differ in the donor and acceptor roles of the functional groups. This pattern was previously deduced topologically among the possible forms of association for heterochiral dimers [Kálmán et al. (2002). Acta Cryst. B58, 494-501]. As they have the same pattern of hydrogen bonds, 8T and 8T* are isostructural. The additional donor (i.e. the second hydrogen of the NH(2) group) present in 8T* links the adjacent ribbons so as to form smaller R(2)(2)(8) rings between them. The crystals of the cis stereoisomer 8C are built up from antiparallel hydrogen-bonded helices. The topology and symmetry of this structure are the same as for the close packing of (1R*,2R*,4S*)-4-tert-butyl-2-hydroxy-1-cyclopentanecarboxamide [Kálmán et al. (2001). Acta Cryst. B57, 539-550]; only the hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors are interchanged, in the same way as in the two dimer types of 8T and 8T* ribbons. This analogy suggests that helices may originate as homochiral dimers with C(2) symmetry and polymerize into helices during crystal formation. The conformational characteristics of the heterochiral dimers observed in the title compounds and in closely related structures are discussed.