Zvonimir Koporc

The Role of Non‐Deletional Tolerance Mechanisms in a Murine Model of Mixed Chimerism with Costimulation Blockade

Peripheral and central clonal deletion are important tolerance mechanisms in models using bone marrow transplantation (BMT) with costimulation blockade (CB). However, since tolerance can be found before peripheral deletion is complete and since elimination of recipient CD4+ cells at the time of BMT prevents tolerance induction, we investigated the potential roles of regulation and anergy in such a murine model. We found that transient elimination of CD25+ cells or neutralization of IL2 immediately after BMT and CB prevented the induction of skin graft tolerance. Cotransfer into SCID mice of CD4+ cells taken from chimeras early after BMT, together with naïve recipient‐type CD4+ cells significantly prolonged donor skin graft survival. In contrast, cotransfer of CD4+ cells harvested from chimeras late after BMT did not prolong donor skin graft survival. Besides, depletion of CD25+ cells in established chimeras several months post‐BMT did not break tolerance. In vivo administration of recombinant IL2 inhibited chimerism and tolerance neither early nor late post‐BMT, arguing against a decisive role for classical anergy. Thus, CD4 cell‐mediated regulation contributes significantly to tolerance induction early after BMT, but appears to have no critical role in the maintenance of tolerance.

Short-term immunosuppression facilitates induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance after bone marrow transplantation without cytoreductive conditioning.

Background. Induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance usually requires cytoreduction or transplantation of high numbers of bone marrow cells (BMC). However, such protocols have only a suboptimal success rate and, more importantly, equivalent numbers of BMC cannot be routinely obtained in the clinical setting. The authors therefore evaluated whether a short-course of immunosuppression (IS) given in addition to co-stimulation blockade would facilitate chimerism induction and allow reduction of the minimally required number of BMC without cytoreduction. Methods. B6 mice received 200, 100, or 50×106 unseparated BMC from Balb/c donors plus an anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody (mAb) and CTLA4Ig (without irradiation or cytotoxic drugs). Some groups were treated additionally with IS (rapamycin, methylprednisolone, and mycophenolate mofetil for 4 weeks after bone marrow transplantation), donor-specific transfusion (DST), or anti-OX40L mAb, as indicated. Results. IS led to long-term multilineage chimerism in 9 of 10 mice receiving 200×106 BMC (without IS, 1 of 4; P<0.05), in all mice (n=10) receiving 100×106 (without IS, 6 of 9; P<0.05), and notably in 9 of 10 mice treated with 50×106 BMC (without IS, 4 of 10; P<0.05). With transient IS, donor skin grafts were accepted longer than 170 days in 9 of 10 mice receiving 200×106 (without IS, 0 of 5 mice; P<0.05), all mice receiving 100×106 (without IS, 6 of 9; P<0.05), and 6 of 11 mice receiving 50×106 BMC (without IS, 4 of 10). The use of DST or anti-OX40L mAb had no beneficial effect. Conclusions. Transient IS significantly improves rates of chimerism and donor skin graft survival, and allows lasting mixed chimerism after transplantation of only 50×106 BMC. Thus, IS might help in the further development of noncytoreductive chimerism protocols.

Mechanisms of tolerance induction through the transplantation of donor hematopoietic stem cells: central versus peripheral tolerance.

The transplantation of donor hematopoietic stem cells has been used successfully in numerous experimental settings to induce donor-specific tolerance. After appropriate host conditioning, hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation leads to a lasting state of donor macrochimerism that is associated with a robust form of tolerance. One of the key factors in the success of this approach is its reliance on intrathymic clonal deletion to ensure lifelong tolerization of newly developing T cells. Evidence for ongoing central deletion comes from studies following superantigen-reactive T cells and from experiments using mice transgenic for an alloreactive T-cell receptor. In protocols inducing tolerance through macrochimerism, the preexisting mature T-cell repertoire is controlled by either globally destroying all T cells before the hematopoietic cell transplantation or, in more recent models, by tolerizing it through co-stimulation blockade. The peripheral mechanisms induced by hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and co-stimulation blockade include both extrathymic clonal deletion and the nondeletional mechanisms anergy, suppression, or both. In addition to these immunologic hurdles, a physiologic engraftment barrier has to be surmounted for the successful induction of mixed chimerism. This can be achieved by cytoreductive host treatment or by the infusion of high numbers of donor hematopoietic cells. A detailed delineation of the mechanisms responsible for tolerance induction after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation is expected to help in the translation of these experimental protocols to clinical organ transplantation.

Murine Mobilized Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Have a Lower Capacity than Bone Marrow to Induce Mixed Chimerism and Tolerance

Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) under costimulation blockade allows induction of mixed chimerism and tolerance without global T‐cell depletion (TCD). The mildest such protocols without recipient cytoreduction, however, require clinically impracticable bone marrow (BM) doses. The successful use of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) instead of BM in such regimens would provide a substantial advance, allowing transplantation of higher doses of hematopoietic donor cells. We thus transplanted fully allogeneic murine granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) mobilized PBSC under costimulation blockade (anti‐CD40L and CTLA4Ig). Unexpectedly, PBSC did not engraft, even when very high cell doses together with nonmyeloablative total body irradiation (TBI) were used. We show that, paradoxically, T cells contained in the donor PBSC triggered rejection of the transplanted donor cells. Rejection of donor BM was also triggered by the cotransplantation of unmanipulated donor T cells isolated from naïve (nonmobilized) donors. Donor‐specific transfusion and transient immunosuppression prevented PBSC‐triggered rejection and mixed chimerism and tolerance were achieved, but graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) occurred. The combination of in vivo TCD with costimulation blockade prevented rejection and GVHD. Thus, if allogeneic PBSC are transplanted instead of BM, costimulation blockade alone does not induce chimerism and tolerance without unacceptable GVHD‐toxicity, and the addition of TCD is required for success.

The role of natural killer T cells in costimulation blockade-based mixed chimerism

Distinct lymphocyte populations have been identified that either promote or impede the establishment of chimerism and tolerance through allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Natural killer T (NKT) cells have pleiotropic regulatory properties capable of either augmenting or downmodulating various immune responses. We investigated in this study whether NKT cells affect outcome in mixed chimerism models employing fully mismatched nonmyeloablative BMT with costimulation blockade (CB). The absence of NKT cells had no detectable effect on chimerism or skin graft tolerance after conditioning with 3Gy total body irradiation (TBI), and a limited positive effect with 1Gy TBI. Stimulation of NKT cells with alpha‐galactosylceramide (alpha‐gal) at the time of BMT prevented chimerism and tolerance. Activation of recipient (as opposed to donor) NKT cells was necessary and sufficient for the alpha‐gal effect. The detrimental effect of NKT activation was also observed in the absence of T cells after conditioning with in vivo T‐cell depletion (TCD). NKT cells triggered rejection of BM via NK cells as chimerism and tolerance were not abrogated when NKT cells were stimulated in the absence of both NK cells and T cells. Thus, activation of NKT cells at the time of BMT overcomes the effects of CB, inhibiting the establishment of chimerism and tolerance.