Economics

A general framework is given to analyze the falsifiability of economic models based on a sample of their observable components. It is shown that, when the restrictions implied by the economic theory are insufficient to identify the unknown quantities of the structure, the duality of optimal transportation with zero-one cost function delivers interpretable and operational formulations of the hypothesis of specification correctness from which tests can be constructed to falsify the model.

In this paper, we propose an adaptive group lasso procedure to efficiently estimate structural breaks in cointegrating regressions. It is well-known that the group lasso estimator is not simultaneously estimation consistent and model selection consistent in structural break settings. Hence, we use a first step group lasso estimation of a diverging number of breakpoint candidates to produce weights for a second adaptive group lasso estimation. We prove that parameter changes are estimated consistently by group lasso and show that the number of estimated breaks is greater than the true number but still sufficiently close to it. Then, we use these results and prove that the adaptive group lasso has oracle properties if weights are obtained from our first step estimation. Simulation results show that the proposed estimator delivers the expected results. An economic application to the long-run US money demand function demonstrates the practical importance of this methodology.

This paper considers (partial) identification of a variety of parameters, including counterfactual choice probabilities, in a general class of binary response models with possibly endogenous regressors. Importantly, our framework allows for nonseparable index functions with multi-dimensional latent variables, and does not require parametric distributional assumptions. We demonstrate how various functional form, independence, and monotonicity assumptions can be imposed as constraints in our optimization procedure to tighten the identified set, and we show how these assumptions have meaningful interpretations in terms of restrictions on latent types. In the special case when the index function is linear in the latent variables, we leverage results in computational geometry to provide a tractable means of constructing the sharp set of constraints for our optimization problems. Finally, we apply our method to study the effects of health insurance on the decision to seek medical treatment.

We introduce an approach to deal with self-selection of peers in the linear-in-means model. Contrary to the existing proposals we do not require to specify a model for how the selection of peers comes about. Rather, we exploit two restrictions that are inherent to many such specifications to construct intuitive instrumental variables. These restrictions are that link decisions that involve a given individual are not all independent of one another, but that they are independent of the link behavior between other pairs of individuals. A two-stage least-squares estimator of the linear-in-means model is then readily obtained.

Classical two-sample permutation tests for equality of distributions have exact size in finite samples, but they fail to control size for testing equality of parameters that summarize each distribution. This paper proposes permutation tests for equality of parameters that are estimated at root-n or slower rates. Our general framework applies to both parametric and nonparametric models, with two samples or one sample split into two subsamples. Our tests have correct size asymptotically while preserving exact size in finite samples when distributions are equal. They have no loss in local-asymptotic power compared to tests that use asymptotic critical values. We propose confidence sets with correct coverage in large samples that also have exact coverage in finite samples if distributions are equal up to a transformation. We apply our theory to four commonly-used hypothesis tests of nonparametric functions evaluated at a point. Lastly, simulations show good finite sample properties of our tests.

We propose using a permutation test to detect discontinuities in an underlying economic model at a cutoff point. Relative to the existing literature, we show that this test is well suited for event studies based on time-series data. The test statistic measures the distance between the empirical distribution functions of observed data in two local subsamples on the two sides of the cutoff. Critical values are computed via a standard permutation algorithm. Under a high-level condition that the observed data can be coupled by a collection of conditionally independent variables, we establish the asymptotic validity of the permutation test, allowing the sizes of the local subsamples to be either be fixed or grow to infinity. In the latter case, we also establish that the permutation test is consistent. We demonstrate that our high-level condition can be verified in a broad range of problems in the infill asymptotic time-series setting, which justifies using the permutation test to detect jumps in economic variables such as volatility, trading activity, and liquidity. An empirical illustration on a recent sample of daily S&P 500 returns is provided.

We study the problem of choosing optimal policy rules in uncertain environments using models that may be incomplete and/or partially identified. We consider a policymaker who wishes to choose a policy to maximize a particular counterfactual quantity called a policy transform. We characterize learnability of a set of policy options by the existence of a decision rule that closely approximates the maximin optimal value of the policy transform with high probability. Sufficient conditions are provided for the existence of such a rule. However, learnability of an optimal policy is an ex-ante notion (i.e. before observing a sample), and so ex-post (i.e. after observing a sample) theoretical guarantees for certain policy rules are also provided. Our entire approach is applicable when the distribution of unobservables is not parametrically specified, although we discuss how semiparametric restrictions can be used. Finally, we show possible applications of the procedure to a simultaneous discrete choice example and a program evaluation example.

This paper discusses experimental design to estimate welfare-maximizing policies. We consider a setting where units are organized into large, finitely many independent clusters and interact over unobserved dimensions within each cluster. The contribution of this paper is two-fold. First, we construct a test for whether a welfare-improving treatment configuration exists and hence worth learning by conducting a larger scale experiment. Second, we introduce an adaptive randomization procedure to estimate welfare-maximizing individual treatment allocation rules valid under unobserved interference. We derive asymptotic properties of the marginal effects estimators and finite-sample regret guarantees of the policy. Finally, we illustrate the method's advantage in simulations calibrated to an existing experiment on information diffusion.

Using HILDA data for the years 2001, 2006, 2010, 2014 and 2017, we compute posterior probabilities for dominance for all pairwise comparisons of income distributions in these years. The dominance criteria considered are Lorenz dominance and first and second order stochastic dominance. The income distributions are estimated using an infinite mixture of gamma density functions, with posterior probabilities computed as the proportion of Markov chain Monte Carlo draws that satisfy the inequalities that define the dominance criteria. We find welfare improvements from 2001 to 2006 and qualified improvements from 2006 to the later three years. Evidence of an ordering between 2010, 2014 and 2017 cannot be established.

We develop an inference method for a (sub)vector of parameters identified by conditional moment restrictions, which are implied by economic models such as rational behavior and Euler equations. Building on Bierens (1990), we propose penalized maximum statistics and combine bootstrap inference with model selection. Our method is optimized to be powerful against a set of local alternatives of interest by solving a data-dependent max-min problem for tuning parameter selection. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method by a proof of concept using two empirical examples: rational unbiased reporting of ability status and the elasticity of intertemporal substitution.