Consent is increasingly discussed in today's society, especially in the fields of law and social sciences. People often face a question: If one party chooses to remain silent, does this amount to consent? This issue not only stirs controversy in gender and sexual relations, but also affects our lives and legal rights in medical care, data privacy and many other areas.
The definition of consent includes multiple types such as express consent, implied consent, informed consent, etc., each of which has its own legal meaning and application context.
Consent can be divided into several categories: express consent is when it is clearly expressed verbally or in writing, while implied consent is inferred from behavior or circumstances. For example, in sports competitions, participants, by entering, agree to accept the risks of the competition.
In medicine, informed consent means a voluntary decision made by the patient after fully understanding the risks and effects of treatment. Such examples can be traced back to relevant decisions in legal cases that emphasize the need for doctors to fully inform patients before performing any procedure.
With the advent of the digital age, end-user consent has become legally important. For example, under the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), users’ consent must be valid, freely given, specific, informed, and active. However, in practice, many companies use "dark patterns" to obtain user consent, which raises doubts about whether these consents are legal.
The issue of consent in the digital world is further complicated by issues such as lack of consent and legal enforceability.
In social science research, researchers must obtain informed consent from participants and explain the purpose and methods of the research. Certain groups of people, such as pregnant women or people with mental disorders, require special protection. The purpose of these guidelines is to ensure the ethics of research and the rights of participants.
In law, the concept of consent is often strictly defined, but the issue of consent in social and cultural contexts is more complex and concerns power structures and relationships. Critics point out that over-reliance on legal frameworks can stifle discussion of cultural and social change, making the sole focus on how to legally protect victims while neglecting deeper reflection on social structures.
The issue of consent is increasingly seen as a political issue rather than a merely legal one, as it involves power dynamics and interactions between individuals.
Overall, the definition and understanding of consent is still evolving and requires active dialogue and collaboration across multiple fields, including law, medicine, and social sciences. After all, when a person is silent, can we reasonably assume that this is consent? Is this a question worth pondering for each of us?