In the fields of law, medicine, and social science research, the concept of "consent" is not that simple. Even if a person appears to consent to an action, that consent may not be legally enforceable under certain legal definitions. Whether it is sexual consent, medical procedures, or the use of online data, the law requires a higher standard to confirm the validity of consent. This article will explore the legal boundaries of consent in various contexts, and how when people think they have ‘consented’, the law does not necessarily recognise this.
The definition of consent may vary depending on the industry and specific context. The legal requirements for consent go beyond verbal or written consent and also consider the capabilities of the participants, the circumstances, and potential power imbalances.
Depending on the specific context, "consent" can be divided into various types, including express consent, implied consent, informed consent and unanimous consent. Express consent is consent that is expressed in an unambiguous way, such as by words or in a written record. Implied consent is consent inferred from a person's behavior and situation, which is often not recorded in writing and may be challenged in law.
In medicine, informed consent is the agreement given by a patient after understanding all relevant risks and consequences. This means that medical providers must detail the risks of treatment, otherwise consent may be considered invalid.
In some cases, even if one party expresses clear "consent", the law may still determine that such consent is not legally effective. For example, the law prohibits some minors or mentally incompetent persons from giving legal “consent” even if they express a desire to participate in an activity. The law in these cases will therefore focus more on the capabilities of the participants rather than just their demonstrated willingness.
In the digital world, such as the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), user consent is also a key issue. According to GDPR, the consent of data users must be free, voluntary, clear and specific. However, many technology companies have used improper means to obtain user consent, raising questions about their legality.
In the medical field, doctors must obtain informed consent from patients or face legal liability. Similarly, in social science research, researchers also need to obtain informed consent from participants. However, in some cases, such as psychological experiments, researchers may engage in deception, which complicates the true state of consent.
In sexual activities, "consent" is the main criterion for defining sexual assault. Many legal systems consider that the consent of all participants is required. The Canadian example shows that even if consent is shown, it may not be legally binding if it is based on unequal power or threats.
SummarySome scholars have suggested that the current "consent" model is too simplified and fails to fully consider the complex emotions and power relations between individuals.
Obviously, the definition of consent varies depending on the context and legal framework. Whether in sexual, medical or digital contexts, the law needs a higher standard to ensure the validity of consent. This also prompts us to think about how true consent should be understood and recognized in a diverse reality?