Language
Country/Area
No result found
When consent meets blurred lines: Why can’t you just say yes anymore?
In today's society, the meaning of the word "consent" continues to evolve, and understanding consent has become increasingly complex as issues of gender equality and sexual violence are highlighted. People can no longer just say yes because it can involve power, manipulation, and the emotional vulnerability of each person. With the emphasis on sex education, how to clearly define consent has become an urgent issue for schools and all sectors of society to solve.
Consent is not just a verbal "yes" or "no", but each participant must actively and clearly express their wishes.
Consent can take many forms depending on the context. This includes express consent, implied consent, informed consent and unanimous consent. Express consent is consent that is expressly expressed in writing or verbally, while implied consent is consent that is inferred from a person's behavior and circumstances. Informed consent is also crucial in medical and social science research, where participants need to fully understand the risks and procedures involved in order to legally conduct experiments or treatments.
For example, in the medical field, when a patient receives treatment, the doctor must explain the potential risks and consequences. A doctor may be found to be negligent if he or she fails to explain risks that are significant and those risks subsequently materialize. Therefore, as the legal regulation of consent becomes more and more clear, the legality of medical actions is also increasingly valued.
In sex education, teaching the issue of consent can help young people have a more mature understanding of sexual behavior.
With the rise of the "#MeToo" movement, society's discussion on "consent" has become more in-depth. Many academics advocate the adoption of the concept of "positive consent", that is, consent expressed clearly by both parties, rather than just passive "non-refusal". This requires each party to maintain communication during the participation process to ensure that everyone participates voluntarily and actively.
In educational settings, many universities have adopted policies emphasizing "positive consent," which extends not just to consent for sexual acts but to all interpersonal interactions. This new model of consent requires people to express their wishes on a regular basis, whether in romantic relationships or other types of interactions.
The concept of active consent not only challenges the previous concept of passive acceptance of consent, but also requires active participation by both parties.
However, this model has also attracted criticism. Some commenters noted that "positive consent" may not adequately capture the complexity of all social and cultural situations. For some groups, such as people with cognitive disabilities or minors, there are still clear lines in the law about what constitutes consent. Unfortunately, consent defined by law may not be consistent with moral values, thus creating a contradiction between social concepts and the law.
In social science research, researchers usually need to obtain informed consent from subjects. This means that the purpose of the study must be explained to participants, as well as the significance of their participation in the study. However, when deception is used as part of research, traditional informed consent procedures do not seem to fully protect the rights of participants, so desensitization after conducting research has become an important issue in modern social science research.
Due to the influence of the legal and cultural environment, the discussion of consent in sex education is not limited to young people. All walks of life have also begun to look forward to the improvement of overall social awareness. In the UK, it has gradually become a new trend to hold courses and events focused on "consent". This is not only about how to recognize and express consent, but also brings about a wider discussion about how to promote healthy relationships.
Compared with single legal norms, education and awareness-raising at the cultural level may be more effective in changing people's shallow understanding of consent. What is more needed is the public's in-depth understanding and open discussion of this issue. This is not only a discussion of law, but also a deep thinking on interpersonal relationships, power structures and human interaction. So how can we find a broad understanding of consent in our daily lives to better protect the rights of every individual?
