Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. Ballesteros.
Reproductive Biomedicine Online | 2011
M. Esbert; Alberto Pacheco; Francesca Vidal; Mireia Florensa; M. Riqueros; A. Ballesteros; Nicolás Garrido; G. Calderon
A prospective study was performed to assess the impact of sperm DNA fragmentation on the outcome of IVF with own or donated oocytes. The study population included 178 couples (62 cycles of IVF, 116 of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)) with own (n=77) and donor (n=101) oocytes. DNA fragmentation was evaluated by TdT (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase)-mediated dUDP nick-end labelling assay. Correlation between DNA damage to oocyte fertilization, embryo quality and clinical pregnancy, implantation and miscarriage rates was evaluated. DNA fragmentation was not related to fertilization rates in either IVF (r=0.08) or ICSI (r=-0.04) cycles. DNA fragmentation was similar in patients with <50% embryo utilization rate compared with ≥50%, in cancelled and in embryo transfer cycles and in miscarriages and in successful deliveries. Moreover, DNA fragmentation was similar in pregnant and non-pregnant women as well as in IVF with own or donor oocytes. In the multivariable analysis, the odds ratio of DNA after controlling by age was 1.0. Using a 36% sperm fragmentation threshold, results did not vary. It is concluded that DNA damage was not related to outcomes of IVF or ICSI with own or donor oocytes.
Reproductive Biomedicine Online | 2013
Antonio Requena; María Cruz; Diana Collado; Alexandra Izquierdo; A. Ballesteros; Manuel Muñoz; Juan A. Garcia-Velasco
Ovarian stimulation treatment is recognized as placing a physical and psychological burden on patients and oocyte donors. The introduction of sustained follicle stimulants will reduce the number of injections and may improve the overall patient experience. This study aimed to evaluate the degree of satisfaction in oocyte donors undergoing treatment with corifollitropin α, a synthetic recombinant rFSH which replaces daily FSH injections for the first week of ovarian stimulation. The results showed no significant differences in clinical parameters between the two protocols (recombinant FSH versus corifollitropin α). Implantation rates for the corifollitropin α and daily FSH protocol groups were 39.1% and 38.4%, respectively, while ongoing pregnancy rates were 45.9% and 44.4%. There were no statistical between-group differences in the responses to the questionnaires. However, donors treated with corifollitropin α who had undergone a previous cycle with daily FSH reported greater satisfaction with the corifollitropin α protocol. In conclusion, no significant differences were found in any analysed parameters between treatments. However, when donors who had undergone both treatments chose which treatment they preferred, the results clearly showed a positive trend towards choosing corifollitropin α, confirming that this protocol may reduce treatment burden and increase donor compliance.
Journal of Andrology | 2017
M. Esbert; Anna Godo; Sérgio Reis Soares; Mireia Florensa; D. Amorós; A. Ballesteros; Francesca Vidal
Colloidal super‐paramagnetic microbeads conjugated with annexin V are effective for separating apoptotic spermatozoa by MACS as a result of the high affinity of annexin V for externalized PS molecules. The effectiveness of the procedure in reducing the percentage of sperm with fragmented DNA and abnormal morphology has also been reported. However, it is still unknown if it could decrease the percentage of aneuploid spermatozoa. The objective of our prospective study, performed on 16 males with abnormal FISH on spermatozoa, was to assess if MACS columns were useful tools to retain spermatozoa carrying chromosomal abnormalities in semen samples processed after density gradient centrifugation (DGC). The pellet obtained after DGC was subjected to MACS, and sperm FISH analyses were performed both in the eluded fraction and in the fraction retained in the column. The observed frequencies of disomy and nullisomy 13, 18, and 21, X and Y, as well as the diploidy rates in the MACS eluded fraction and the fraction retained in the MACS column were recorded. We observed that the frequencies of aneuploidies in the eluded fraction were lower than in the fraction retained in the MACS column (0.59% vs. 0.75%; p = 0.010). DGC determined a significant reduction in sperm concentration (z‐ratio = 2.83; p = 0.005) and a significant increase in sperm progressive motility (z‐ratio = −3.5; p < 0.001). MACS also led to a significant reduction in sperm concentration (z‐ratio = 3.14; p = 0.002) and a significant increase in progressive motility (z‐ratio = −2.59; p = 0.01) when compared with the post‐DGC sample. Sperm concentration was similar in the two fractions generated by MACS (z‐ratio = 0.63; p = 0.52), while progressive motility was significantly higher in the MACS eluded fraction (z‐ratio = 2.42; p = 0.02). According to our results, MACS columns are able to selectively retain spermatozoa carrying chromosomal abnormalities. Furthermore, the performance of DGC and MACS on semen samples leads to an enrichment of progressive motility.
Journal of Andrology | 2018
M. Esbert; A. Pacheco; Sérgio Reis Soares; D. Amorós; Mireia Florensa; A. Ballesteros; M. Meseguer
Time‐lapse monitoring (TLM) technology has been implemented in the clinical setting for the culture and selection of human embryos. Many studies have assessed the association between sperm DNA fragmentation (sDNAf) and clinical outcomes after ART, but little is known about the influence of sDNA on embryo morphokinetics.
Fertility and Sterility | 2009
M. Esbert; M. Florensa; M. Riqueros; M. Martín; A. Ballesteros; G. Calderon
Fertility and Sterility | 2018
M. Esbert; S.R. Soares; Alberto Pacheco; A. Ballesteros; M. Florensa; Marcos Meseguer
Fertility and Sterility | 2017
M. Esbert; A. Marconetto; S.R. Soares; M. Quera; J. Molina; M. Florensa; A. Ballesteros; M. Meseguer
Fertility and Sterility | 2013
M. Belles; N. Costa-Borges; J.M. Molina; A. Pellicer; A. Ballesteros; M. Esbert
Fertility and Sterility | 2013
J.M. Molina; M. Esbert; M. Riqueros; A. Ballesteros; A. Pellicer; M. Florensa
Fertility and Sterility | 2013
M. Esbert; M. Florensa; M. Riqueros; J. Teruel; A. Ballesteros