Lorena Rodrigo

Impact of preimplantation genetic diagnosis on IVF outcome in implantation failure patients.

Implantation failure (IF) is defined as three or more failed IVF attempts, and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is being used in these patients to improve IVF outcome. PGD was performed in 49 implantation failure patients with a mean number of 4.2 +/- 1.6 previous IVF failures, and in nine fertile controls. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) on blastomeres from biopsied day 3 embryos was performed for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y. There was a significantly higher rate of chromosomal abnormalities (67.4%) compared with controls (36.3%). In 57 cycles, a pregnancy rate of 34.0% and an implantation rate of 19.8% was observed in implantation failure patients compared with controls (33.3 and 24.1% respectively), with all the pregnancies in the implantation failure group coming from the transfer of at least one chromosomally normal blastocyst on day 5. It is concluded that in IVF patients, use of PGD along with blastocyst transfer improves IVF outcome.

FISH screening of aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos to improve IVF outcome.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has transformed the approach to the infertility patient in the IVF setting. Although the principal applications of PGD have been to prevent the transmission of sex-linked diseases, in time and with growing knowledge of the chromosomal abnormalities observed in preimplantation embryos, its applications have widened. Nowadays, apart from its implications in the prevention of transmission of chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, PGD is being used with increased frequency to improve the IVF outcome in patients with advanced maternal age (> or =38 years of age), recurrent miscarriage (> or =2 miscarriages), recurrent IVF failure (> or =3 failed IVF attempts) and severe male infertility. A high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities has been observed in these patient groups.

Embryo aneuploidy screening for unexplained Recurrent miscarriage: A minireview

Problem:  The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM) patients and assess the role of pre‐implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in preventing subsequent pregnancy loss and improving pregnancy outcome.

Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results

OBJECTIVE To review clinical outcomes after preimplantation genetic screening. Most methods of embryo viability assessment involve morphologic evaluation at different preimplantation developmental stages. A weak association between blastocyst morphology and aneuploidy has been described, supporting the basis for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) for assessment of embryo viability. The expected improvement in reproductive outcome rates has been reached with the application of microarrays based on comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in clinical routine PGS. DESIGN Review of published studies and own unpublished data. SETTING University-affiliated private institution. PATIENT(S) IVF patients undergoing PGS at different stages. INTERVENTION(S) PGS with polar body, cleavage-stage, and blastocyst biopsies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Aneuploidy, implantation, and pregnancy rates. RESULTS The clinical outcome after analysis of all 24 chromosomes improved pregnancy and implantation rates for different indications to a higher degree than the previously available technology, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), in which only a limited number of chromosomes could be analyzed. CONCLUSION(S) Most of the data regarding the controversy of day-3 biopsy come from FISH cycles, and the utility of day-3 biopsy with new array-CGH technology should be further evaluated through randomized controlled trials. The current trend is blastocyst biopsy with a fresh transfer or vitrification for transfer in a nonstimulated cycle.

Redefining advanced maternal age as an indication for preimplantation genetic screening.

In this retrospective study, the utility of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in patients with advanced maternal age is evaluated. The patient population consisted of women aged 38-44years and included in a regular IVF programme with or without PGS analysis. Transfer rate, ongoing implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate were the main outcome parameters measured. A trend of better ongoing pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was observed in patients aged 38 and 39years in the non-PGS group when compared with PGS groups, but better ongoing pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval was observed in patients 41-44years old in the PGS group. When patients with a low ovarian response accumulated oocytes in several stimulation cycles, clinical outcomes were comparable to those of normal-responder patients. These results show that, although PGS does not benefit patients less than 40years of age, reproductive success increases more than two-fold in patients over 40years, especially in patients with more than six metaphase II oocytes, as a result of a good ovarian response or gamete accumulation, suggesting a redefinition of advanced maternal age as indication for PGS. In this retrospective study, the utility of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) in patients with advanced maternal age is evaluated. Patient population consisted of women aged 38-44 years and included in a regular IVF programme with or without PGS analysis. Transfer rate, ongoing implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate were the main outcome parameters measured. A trend of better ongoing pregnancy rate per ovarian stimulation cycle was observed in patients aged 38-39 years in the non-PGS group when compared with PGS groups, but better ongoing implantation rate was observed in patients aged 41-44 years old in the PGS group. When patients with a low ovarian response (low number of oocytes available for the IVF cycle) accumulated oocytes in several stimulation cycles, their reproductive possibilities were comparable to those of normal-responder patients. These results show that, although PGS does not benefit patients less than 40 years of age, reproductive success increases more than 2-fold in patients over 40 years, especially in patients with more than six metaphase II oocytes, as a result of a good ovarian response or gamete accumulation, suggesting a redefinition of advanced maternal age as indication for PGS.

Prospective cohort study in high responder oocyte donors using two hormonal stimulation protocols: impact on embryo aneuploidy and development

BACKGROUND Ovarian stimulation regimens for in vitro fertilization seem to have a deleterious effect on oocyte quality and embryo aneuploidy in a dose-dependent manner. This study aims to test the influence of gonadotrophin doses on embryo aneuploidy rates. METHODS A total of 32 young oocyte donors with a high response to ovarian stimulation, were included in the study. Two subsequent stimulation treatments were performed in each donor: first, a standard dose cycle using a 225 IU starting dose of recombinant FSH (r-FSH) and secondly, a reduced dose cycle with a starting dose of 150 IU r-FSH. In both cycles, GnRH agonist co-treatment was used for down-regulation. Ovarian response, embryo development and aneuploidy for chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, X and Y were the main outcomes of the study. RESULTS A total of 22 donors completed both treatments with different gonadotrophin doses. In the remaining 10 donors, the reduced dose cycle was cancelled due to low ovarian response. In those donors who completed both regimens, significant increases in rates of fertilization and chromosomally normal blastocysts were observed in the reduced dose cycle. No differences were observed in pregnancy and implantation rates in recipients who received oocytes from standard and reduced doses cycles. CONCLUSIONS Despite the limited numbers in our study, we can conclude that in high responder donors, a decrease in the gonadotrophin dose could improve fertilization rates and embryo quality. However, due to the reduced oocyte numbers with lower doses, a similar reproductive outcome in terms of live births would be expected.

Prognostic factors for preimplantation genetic screening in repeated pregnancy loss

The objective of this study was to identify specific subgroups of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients of unknown aetiology in whom the selection of chromosomally normal embryos for transfer improves reproductive outcome in preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). A total of 428 PGS cycles were included and chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y were evaluated. In RPL patients < or =37 years, a lower incidence of chromosomal abnormalities (P = 0.0004) and miscarriages (P = 0.0283) was observed, and there were significantly higher pregnancy (P < 0.0384) and implantation (P < 0.0434) rates than in patients >37 years. In the former subset, results showed: (i) significantly higher implantation rates (P = 0.0411) in couples that had experienced a previous aneuploid miscarriage; (ii) similar aneuploidy, pregnancy and implantation rates in couples suffering previous miscarriages during fertility treatments and in those with previous spontaneous pregnancies; (iii) no miscarriages after PGS in couples in whom a fluorescence in-situ hybridization assay showed the male partners sperm to be abnormal; and (iv) lower implantation rates in couples with > or =5 previous miscarriages, associated with a lower percentage of chromosomally abnormal embryos. It is concluded that PGS is to be strongly recommended when RPL is associated with miscarriages during infertility treatments, chromosomopathy in a previous miscarriage, up to five previous miscarriages and a high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in spermatozoa.

Moderate Ovarian Stimulation Does Not Increase the Incidence of Human Embryo Chromosomal Abnormalities in in Vitro Fertilization Cycles

CONTEXT A high chromosomal abnormalities rate has been observed in human embryos derived from in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. The real incidence in natural cycles has been poorly studied, so whether this frequency may be induced by external factors, such as use of gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation, remains unknown. DESIGN We conducted a prospective cohort study in a University-affiliated private infertility clinic with a comparison between unstimulated and stimulated ovarian cycles in the same women. Preimplantation genetic screening by fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in all viable d 3 embryos. OBJECTIVE The primary objective was to compare the incidence of embryo chromosomal abnormalities in an unstimulated cycle and in an ulterior moderate ovarian stimulated cycle. Secondary outcome measures were embryo quality, blastocyst rate of biopsied embryos, number of normal blastocysts per donor, type of chromosomal abnormalities, and clinical outcome. RESULTS One hundred eighty-five oocyte donors were initially recruited for the unstimulated cycle, and preimplantation genetic screening could be performed in 51 of them, showing 35.3% of embryo chromosomal abnormalities. Forty-six of them later completed a stimulated cycle. The sperm donor sample was the same for both cycles. The proportion of embryos displaying abnormalities in the unstimulated cycle was 34.8% (16 of 46), whereas it was 40.6% (123 of 303) in the stimulated cycle with risk difference=5.8 [95% confidence interval (CI)=-20.6-9.0], and relative risk=1.17 (95% CI=0.77-1.77) (P=0.45). When an intrasubject comparison was made, the abnormalities rate was 34.8% (95% CI=20.5-49.1) in the unstimulated cycle and 38.2% (95% CI=30.5-45.8) in the stimulated cycle [risk difference=3.4 (95% CI=-17.9-11.2); P=0.64]. No differences were observed for embryo quality and type of chromosomal abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS Moderate ovarian stimulation in young normo-ovulatory women does not significantly increase the embryo aneuploidies rate in in vitro fertilization-derived human embryos as compared with an unstimulated cycle. Whether these results can be extrapolated to infertile patients is still unknown.

New Tools for Embryo Selection: Comprehensive Chromosome Screening by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization

The objective of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) using array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). The study included 1420 CCS cycles for recurrent miscarriage (n = 203); repetitive implantation failure (n = 188); severe male factor (n = 116); previous trisomic pregnancy (n = 33); and advanced maternal age (n = 880). CCS was performed in cycles with fresh oocytes and embryos (n = 774); mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified oocytes (n = 320); mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified day-2 embryos (n = 235); and mixed cycles with fresh and vitrified day-3 embryos (n = 91). Day-3 embryo biopsy was performed and analyzed by aCGH followed by day-5 embryo transfer. Consistent implantation (range: 40.5–54.2%) and pregnancy rates per transfer (range: 46.0–62.9%) were obtained for all the indications and independently of the origin of the oocytes or embryos. However, a lower delivery rate per cycle was achieved in women aged over 40 years (18.1%) due to the higher percentage of aneuploid embryos (85.3%) and lower number of cycles with at least one euploid embryo available per transfer (40.3%). We concluded that aneuploidy is one of the major factors which affect embryo implantation.

Impact of different patterns of sperm chromosomal abnormalities on the chromosomal constitution of preimplantation embryos

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of sperm chromosome abnormalities--disomy for sex chromosomes and diploidy--in the chromosomal constitution of preimplantation embryos. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Infertility clinic. PATIENT(S) Three groups: 46,XY infertile men with increased incidence of sex chromosome disomy in sperm; 46,XY infertile men with increased diploidy rates in sperm; 47,XYY infertile men with increased sex chromosome disomy and diploidy rates in sperm. INTERVENTION(S) Sperm collection for fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Frequencies of numerical abnormalities in sperm for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y, and in embryos for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X, and Y. RESULT(S) A significant increase of chromosomally abnormal and mosaic embryos was observed in the three study groups compared with controls. Those sperm samples with increased sex chromosome disomy rates produced significantly higher percentages of aneuploid embryos, with a threefold increase for sex chromosomes. Sperm samples with increased diploidy rates were mainly associated to the production of triploid embryos. CONCLUSION(S) A strong correlation between sperm and embryo chromosomal constitution has been shown in infertile men with 46,XY and 47,XYY karyotypes.