A. Dingemans

Eligibility for concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy of locally advanced lung cancer patients: a prospective, population-based study

BACKGROUND Patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and limited disease small-cell lung cancer are excluded from concurrent chemoradiation mostly on the basis of comorbidity and age. The purpose of this prospective study was to get insight in what proportion of patients with locally advanced lung cancer would be suitable for concurrent chemoradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2002 to 2005, all patients with a pathological diagnosis of lung cancer and with locally advanced disease in the Maastricht Cancer Registry, the Netherlands, comorbidity were prospectively assessed. Patients were regarded as noneligible for concurrent chemoradiation if they had one or more important comorbidity or were 75 years or older. RESULTS In all, 711 patients were included, 577 with NSCLC and 134 with SCLC. Overall, 166 patients (23.3%) were 75 years or older. Of the 526 patients <75 years, comorbidities were as follows: 278 (52.9%) 0, 188 (35.7%) 1, and 56 (11.4%) 2 or more. In all, 408/686 (59%) of the whole patient group were considered as ineligible for concurrent chemoradiation. CONCLUSIONS More than half of patients with stage III lung cancer were theoretically not eligible for concurrent chemoradiation. Less toxic alternatives are needed for these patients.

First-line erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study including molecular imaging

BACKGROUND Both bevacizumab and erlotinib have clinical activity in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical data suggest synergistic activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Chemonaive patients with stage IIIb or IV non-squamous NSCLC were treated with bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks and erlotinib 150 mg daily until progression. Primary end point was non-progression rate (NPR) at 6 weeks. Tumor response was measured with computed tomography, 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). KRAS and EGFR mutations were assessed in tumor samples. RESULTS Forty-seven patients were included. Median follow-up was 15.2 months. NPR at 6 weeks was 75%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.3-5.4] months and median overall survival (OS) was 6.9 (95% CI 5.5-8.4) months. Toxicity was mainly mild. The presence of KRAS (n = 10) or EGFR mutations (n = 5) did not influence outcome. After 3 weeks of treatment, >20% decrease in standard uptake value as measured with positron emission tomography predicted for longer PFS (9.7 versus 2.8 months; P = 0.01) and >40% decrease in K(trans) as assessed by DCE-MRI did not predict for longer PFS. CONCLUSIONS First-line treatment with bevacizumab and erlotinib in stage IIIb/IV NSCLC resulted in an NPR of 75%. OS was however disappointing. Early response evaluation with FDG-PET is the best predictive test for PFS.

VeriStrat (R) has prognostic value in advanced stage NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib and sorafenib

Background:The serum proteomic test VeriStrat has been shown to be able to classify advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for overall survival (OS) after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this study, VeriStrat was evaluated as a pre-treatment stratification tool in patients with advanced stage NSCLC for treatment with the combination of erlotinib and sorafenib, considering both OS and progression-free survival (PFS) as end points.Methods:Serum samples from 50 patients treated within the context of a phase II trial of first-line erlotinib and sorafenib were analysed with VeriStrat, a fully locked mass spectrometry-based test that identifies patients likely to have good or poor outcome on EGFR therapy based on eight distinct features in mass spectra. Analysis was performed fully blinded to all clinical data, and then the outcome data were analysed with respect to the obtained serum classifications.Results:VeriStrat classified pre-treatment samples into two groups, VeriStrat Good and VeriStrat Poor, which were significantly different in OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.30, log-rank P=0.009) and in PFS (HR 0.40, log-rank P=0.035).Conclusion:VeriStrat has shown its potential for stratification of unselected, advanced stage NSCLC patients treated in first line with a combination of erlotinib and sorafenib.

EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients: More prone to development of bone and brain metastases?

OBJECTIVES Both bone and brain are frequent sites of metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Conflicting data exist whether EGFR mutant (+) patients are more prone to develop brain metastases or have a better outcome with brain metastases compared to EGFR/KRAS wildtype (WT) or KRAS+ patients. For bone metastases this has not been studied. METHODS In this retrospective case-control study all EGFR+ (exons 19 and 21) patients diagnosed at two pathology departments were selected (2004/2008 to 2012). For every EGFR+ patient a consecutive KRAS+ and WT patient with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) was identified. Patients with another malignancy within 2 years of mNSCLC diagnosis were excluded. Data regarding age, gender, performance score, histology, treatment, bone/brain metastases diagnosis, skeletal related events (SRE) and subsequent survival were collected. RESULTS 189 patients were included: 62 EGFR+, 65 KRAS+, 62 WT. 32%, 35% and 40%, respectively, had brain metastases (p=0.645). Mean time to brain metastases was 20.8 [± 12.0], 10.8 [± 9.8], 16.4 [± 10.2] months (EGFR+-KRAS+, p = 0.020, EGFR+-WT, p = 0.321). Median post brain metastases survival was 12.1 [5.0-19.1], 7.6 [1.2-14.0], 10.7 [1.5-19.8] months (p = 0.674). 60%, 52% and 50% had metastatic bone disease (p=0.528). Mean time to development of metastatic bone disease was 13.4 [± 10.6], 23.3 [± 19.4], 16.4 [± 9.6] months (p = 0.201). Median post metastatic bone disease survival was 15.0 [10.6-20.3], 9.0 [5.2-12.9], 3.2 [0.0-6.9] months (p = 0.010). Time to 1st SRE was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS Incidence of brain and bone metastases was not different between EGFR+, KRAS+ and WT patients. Post brain metastases survival, time from mNSCLC diagnosis to metastatic bone disease and 1st SRE did not differ either. Post metastatic bone disease survival was significantly longer in EGFR+ patients. Although prevention of SREs is important for all patients, the latter finding calls for a separate study for SRE preventing agents in EGFR+ patients.

A randomized phase II study comparing erlotinib versus erlotinib with alternating chemotherapy in relapsed non-small-cell lung cancer patients: the NVALT-10 study

BACKGROUND Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) administered concurrently with chemotherapy did not improve outcome in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, in preclinical models and early phase noncomparative studies, pharmacodynamic separation of chemotherapy and TKIs did show a synergistic effect. PATIENTS AND METHODS A randomized phase II study was carried out in patients with advanced NSCLC who had progressed on or following first-line chemotherapy. Erlotinib 150 mg daily (monotherapy) or erlotinib 150 mg during 15 days intercalated with four 21-day cycles docetaxel for squamous (SQ) or pemetrexed for nonsquamous (NSQ) patients was administered (combination therapy). After completion of chemotherapy, erlotinib was continued daily. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-one patients were randomized, 115 in the monotherapy arm and 116 in the combination arm. The adjusted hazard ratio for PFS was 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58-1.02; P = 0.06], for overall survival (OS) 0.67 (95% CI 0.49-0.91; P = 0.01) favoring the combination arm. This improvement was primarily observed in NSQ subgroup. Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3+ toxic effect occurred in 20% versus 56%, rash in 7% versus 15% and febrile neutropenia in 0% versus 6% in monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS PFS was not significantly different between the arms. OS was significantly improved in the combination arm, an effect restricted to NSQ histology. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00835471.

Risk factors for mortality in patients with pulmonary infections with non-tuberculous mycobacteria: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND Infections with non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) represent an increasing problem. Their clinical relevance is still largely unknown as well as predictors for mortality in affected patients. The objective was to describe prevalence and clinical relevance of different NTM and to identify risk factors for mortality. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 124 patients with NTM detection between January 2001 and December 2011. Clinical characteristics like symptoms and radiological appearance were assessed at presentation. The primary outcome was all cause mortality during the follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses using Cox proportional hazard models were employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS Over the study period, the frequency of NTM isolation varied from 4 to 12 patients per year. Twenty-nine out of 124 patients (23%) had a clinically relevant infection, according to the criteria of the American Thoracic Society (ATS). Mycobacterium avium was isolated most frequently, but Mycobacterium kansasii, Mycobacterium malmoense and Mycobacterium xenopi had the highest clinical relevance. Symptoms were mostly diverse and non-specific. On radiology, cavities were observed more frequently than a nodular-bronchiectatic variant or consolidation. In 75% of all patients, follow up time was more than two years. Median survival was 6.5 years (95%CI = 2.7-10.3). Factors significantly influencing survival time were haemoptysis (HR = 0.2, 95%CI = 0.1-0.6) and a consolidation on imaging (HR = 5.1, 95%CI 1.4-18.2). CONCLUSIONS The presentation of an infection with NTM can be diverse and depends mainly on the causative NTM pathogen. The most important predictor for increased mortality is the radiological appearance of a consolidation.

Dichotomous ALK-IHC is a better predictor for ALK inhibition outcome than traditional ALK-FISH in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose: ALK rearrangement detection using FISH is the standard test to identify patients with non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) eligible for treatment with ALK inhibitors. Recently, ALK protein expression in resectable NSCLC showed predictive value. We evaluated tumor response rate and survival after crizotinib treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with ALK activation using both dichotomous immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and FISH. Experimental Design: Patients with stage IV NSCLC treated with crizotinib were selected. Tumor response was assessed. ALK rearrangements were detected by FISH (Vysis ALK-break-apart FISH-Probe KIT) and IHC [Ventana ALK (D5F3) CDx assay]. Cohorts of patients with ALK-FISH–positive advanced NSCLC from four other hospitals were used for validation. Results: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC diagnosed by FISH and/or IHC on small biopsies or fine-needle aspirations (FNA) were treated with ALK inhibitors. All ALK-IHC–positive patients responded to crizotinib except three with primary resistance. No tumor response was observed in 13 ALK-FISH–positive but ALK-IHC–negative patients. This was confirmed in an external cohort of 16 patients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for ALK-IHC and ALK-FISH compared with treatment outcome showed that dichotomous ALK-IHC outperforms ALK-FISH [tumor response area under the curve: (AUC), 0.86 vs. 0.64, P = 0.03; progression-free survival (PFS): AUC 0.86 vs. 0.36, P = 0.005; overall survival (OS): AUC, 0.78 vs. 0.41, P = 0.01, respectively]. Conclusions: Dichotomous ALK-IHC is superior to ALK-FISH on small biopsies and FNA to predict tumor response and survival to crizotinib for patients with advanced NSCLC. Our data strongly suggest adapting the guidelines and using dichotomous ALK-IHC as standard companion diagnostic test to select patients with NSCLC who benefit from ALK-targeting therapy. Clin Cancer Res; 23(15); 4251–8. ©2017 AACR.

Association of molecular status and metastatic organs at diagnosis in patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES Biological predisposition for specific metastatic organs might differ between molecular subgroups of lung cancer. We aimed to assess the association between molecular status and metastatic organs at diagnosis in a nationwide stage IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer ((ns)-NSCLC) cohort. METHODS All ns-NSCLC from 2013 that were stage IV at diagnosis were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, which records information on metastatic organs at diagnosis. Tumors were matched to the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) from which data on molecular status established in routine practice was extracted. Four molecular subgroups (EGFR+, KRAS+, ALK+, triple-negative) were identified. For each metastatic organ, proportions of tumors metastasized to this organ were, per molecular subgroup, compared to triple-negative tumors by multivariable logistic regression analyses (adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)), taking clinicopathological variables into account. RESULTS 160 EGFR+ (exon 19 del, exon 21 L858R), 784 KRAS+, 42 ALK+, and 1008 triple-negative tumors were identified. Most frequent metastatic organs were the bone (34%), pleura (24%), lung (23%), and brain (22%). Compared to triple-negatives, EGFR+ tumors had more often metastases to the bone (31.5 vs 53.8%; OR 2.55 (95% CI 1.80-3.62)) and pleura (24.1 vs 37.5%; OR 2.06 (1.42-2.98)), and less often to the brain (22.0 vs 12.5%; OR 0.53 (0.32-0.88)) and adrenal glands (19.1 vs 7.5%; OR 0.46 (0.28-0.75)). Compared to triple-negatives, KRAS+ and ALK+ tumors had at diagnosis metastasized more often to the lung (20.3 vs 26.7%; OR 1.40 (1.12-1.76)) and the liver (13.1 vs 23.8%; OR 2.07 (1.00-4.32)), respectively. CONCLUSION NSCLC molecular status was associated with metastatic pattern at diagnosis. 54% of stage IV EGFR+ ns-NSCLC patients had bone metastases at diagnosis. These observational results are hypothesis generating, and call for a prospective study where EGFR+ patients are screened for bone metastases, and treated to prevent skeletal related events.

158P: PET/CT based imaging biomarkers for response prediction of stage IV NSCLC treated with paclitaxel-carboplatin-bevacizumab with or without nitroglycerin.

correlation of its baseline values to the efficacy of pemetrexed and performed a dynamic monitoring study in NSCLC patients who underwent first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: This study enrolled 70 NSCLC patients who received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The CTCs were quantified by negative enrichment using immunomagnetic beads in combination with folate receptor-directed PCR that allows secondary amplification of tiny amounts of CTCs in peripheral blood. In this study, the CTC levels were examined by collecting 3mL of anti-EDTA whole blood samples before the treatment and after every chemotherapy, and followed up until progressive disease (PD) or completion of first-line chemotherapy. Results: Of twenty-two patients who received pemetrexed disodium/platinum combined therapy (AP/AC), the patients harboring high levels of folate receptor showed greater efficacy than those with low expression levels (8.7 < CTC level < 16, n = 7; PFS: 448 vs.94 days, P = 0.0199; ORR: 75% vs.11%). In the dynamic monitoring study, the CTC level (AUC=0.8026, P = 0.0033), the CTC ratio (AUC=0.8422, P = 0.0003), the rate of CTC changes (OR=102.005, P = 0.0012) after the second chemotherapy and the CTC level (AUC=0.9487, P < 0.0001), the CTC ratio (AUC=0.8889, P < 0.0001), the changing rate of CTCs (OR=51.662, P = 0.0031) after the fourth chemotherapy positively correlated to the disease progression. Conclusions: The patients with high expression of folate receptor-positive CTCs appear to have superior response to pemetrexed than those with low expression. Additionally, the changes of CTC count can be used as a dynamic monitoring indicator in the treatment process to evaluate tumor burden and therapeutic outcomes. Legal entity responsible for the study: Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University of Medicine Funding: Genosaber Biotech Co.Ltd Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

64INSECONDARY RESISTANCE TO SYSTEMIC TREATMENT

ABSTRACT Introduction: The majority of molecular selected patients treated with targeted agents will eventually relapse due to incomplete target suppression, second site mutations and activation of alternative kinases to maintain signal flux to downstream effectors. Clinical strategies to overcome secondary resistance Patients with oligo-progressive disease can efficiently be treated with local therapy (radiotherapy, surgery) while TKI-treatment continues. Switching to chemotherapy or withhold TKIs for a period of time followed by re-initiation (EGFR holiday) is common practice. The combination of afatinib with cetuximab, showed evident clinical activity in EGFR TKi resistant patients. Promising phase I trial results of two new agents, CO-1686, and AZ-9291, both selectively targeting EGFR mutations, were recently presented. Alk rearranged patients progressing on treatment with crizotinib have been found to exhibit major and long lasting responses to the second generation ALK inhibitors Ceritinib, AP26113 and Alectinib. Importantly, there is evidence that at least one of these agents, Ceritinib, has activity against tumors that have ALK TK mutations conferring resistance to Crizotinib. Similar to clinical strategies to overcome EGFR TKI resistance, retreatment after a crizotinib holiday has been reported to induce clinical response in a case report. Conclusion: With the introduction of targeted treatments, it became clear that tumor characteristics are dynamic and may alter during the course of targeted treatment. Some secondary resistance mechanisms are amendable to further treatment. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.