A. H. Broekhuizen

The Value of Radiographs and Bone Scintigraphy in Suspected Scaphoid Fracture A Statistical Analysis

The role of radiography and bone scintigraphy in the diagnostic management of suspected scaphoid fracture is controversial. Two strategies were compared for patients with initial negative radiographs: repeated radiography versus selective bone scintigraphy. Using the known positive predictive value of scintigraphy, the sensitivity and specificity of both diagnostic strategies were evaluated in a series of 78 consecutive patients. The kappa value for initial radiographs was 0.76 but decreased to 0.5 for follow-up radiographs. Similarly, sensitivity decreased from 64% to 30% in follow-up radiographs. Specificity of the bone scan was 98%. The best diagnostic strategy in the management of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures consists of initial radiography followed by bone scintigraphy in patients with negative radiographs.

Diagnosing scaphoid fractures radiographs cannot be used as a gold standard

To evaluate the reproducibility of the interpretation of radiographs for the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures, 134 radiographs (60 consecutive patients) were blindly observed by a resident radiologist, consultant radiologist, resident trauma surgeon and consultant trauma surgeon. The results of radiographs were analysed using kappa (kappa) statistics and stratified according to the results of the corresponding bone scan. In 23 patients the bone scan was positive for fracture of the scaphoid. Irrespective of training and experience, the kappa of the comparison of the scores of the radiographs between any two observers did not exceed 40 per cent. After stratification of the outcome of the bone scan, the kappa did not increase significantly. A panel of three experienced observers gave their opinion of all radiographs. The results were compared with the bone scan results. We conclude that radiographs in suspected scaphoid fracture cannot be used as a reliable diagnostic approach because of the low inter-observer agreement in the interpretation, irrespective of the experience and training of the observer.

The diagnostic management of suspected scaphoid fracture

The role of radiography and bone scintigraphy in the diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture after carpal injury is reviewed. Evidence is provided that bone scintigraphy is indicated in patients with negative initial scaphoid radiographs. A normal bone scan excludes scaphoid fracture, and a positive bone scan sufficiently confirms the presence of clinically relevant scaphoid fracture. Furthermore, this review assesses the possibility on non-invasive additional radiographs, for the diagnosis or exclusion on scaphoid fracture as a means of avoiding bone scintigraphy in patients with negative first-day X-series.

Radiography and scintigraphy of suspected scaphoid fracture. A long-term study in 160 patients

Radiographs of the scaphoid after injury are difficult to interpret, and bone scintigraphy is widely used to increase the accuracy of diagnosis, though many fractures suspected on scintigraphy cannot be confirmed radiologically. We have reviewed the clinical consequences, after one year, of managing suspected scaphoid fractures according to the bone-scan results. We studied 160 patients, 35 of whom had initially positive radiographs and were treated in a cast for 12 weeks. The other 125 had bone scintigraphy and were managed according to the result. After a minimum of one year 119 patients were reviewed. Scintigraphically suspected scaphoid fracture could not be confirmed radiologically in 25%. There were no cases of nonunion. The long period of immobilisation in patients with positive radiographs or positive bone scans did not influence the frequency or severity of late symptoms compared with those with a normal bone scan.

Magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy in suspected scaphoid fracture

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become increasingly useful in the evaluation of musculoskeletal problems, including those of the wrist. In patients with a wrist injury, MRI is used mainly to assess vascularity of scaphoid non-union. However, the use of MRI in patients in the acute phase following carpal injury is not common. Three-phase bone scintigraphy is routinely performed from at least 72 h after injury in patients with suspected scaphoid fracture and negative initial radiographs. We evaluated MRI in this patient group. The bone scan was used as the reference method. Nineteen patients were included. Bone scintigraphy was performed in all 19 patients, but MRI could be obtained in only 16 (in three patients, MRI was stopped owing to claustrophobia). In five patients, MRI confirmed a scintigraphically suspected scaphoid fracture. In one patient, a perilunar luxation, without a fracture, was seen on MRI, while bone scintigraphy showed a hot spot in the region of the lunate bone, suspected for fracture. This was confirmed by surgery. In two patients, a hot spot in the scaphoid region was suspected for scaphoid fracture, and immobilization and employed for a period of 12 weeks. MRI was negative in both cases; in one of them a scaphoid fracture was retrospectively proven on the initial X-ray series. In another two patients, a hot spot in the region of MCP I was found with a negative MRI. In both, the therapy was adjusted. In the remaining six patients, both modalities were negative. We conclude that in the diagnostic management of patients with suspected scaphoid fracture and negative initial radiographs, the use of MRI may be promising, but is not superior to three-phase bone scintigraphy.

Experimental evaluation of scaphoid X-series, carpal box radiographs, planar tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture.

AIM In this study, we evaluated scaphoid X-series, Carpal Box radiographs (longitudinal and transverse), planar tomography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture. The aim of this study was to evaluate the planar technique in the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture. The use of planar tomography, CT, and MRI was to see whether these methods are useful in the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture when other diagnostics modalities remains negative. METHODS Twenty-eight embalmed human cadaver specimens were used, in 23 of which fractures of the scaphoid were produced mechanically. Scaphoid X-series, Carpal Box posterior-anterior radiographs in ulnar deviation (X-CB), Carpal Box posterior-anterior views with the hand in 15-degree supination and ulnar deviation (X-CB 15-degree) were acted in all specimens, CT in eight wrists, planar tomography in seven wrists, and MRI in five wrists. The anatomic analysis of the specimens was used as the gold standard for comparison. Scaphoid X-series, Carpal Box radiographs, and planar tomography were judged independently and in a blind fashion by six observers, and CT and MRI were also judged independently and in a blind fashion by three radiologists. The observers were asked if they could recognize a scaphoid fracture. The agreement among the six observers for the scaphoid X-series and X-CB was measured. RESULTS In the 23 fractured wrists, scaphoid X-series, X-CB, X-CB 15-degree, was true positive in 12, 14, and 15 wrists, respectively, whereas these methods were true negative in cadaver wrists 1, 3, and 5. CT was true positive in five of five fractured wrists and true negative in three of three negative wrists. Planar tomography was true positive in one of four fractured wrists and true negative in two of three nonfractured wrists. MRI was obtained in five wrists (one without a fracture), of which the fracture was recognized in only two. The highest agreement between observers was found in the X-CB 15-degree. CONCLUSION From the planar investigated methods, the 15-degree Carpal Box posterior-anterior, longitudinal and transverse views were most accurate in recognizing scaphoid fracture with also the highest agreement between the observers.

CARPAL BOX RADIOGRAPHY IN SUSPECTED SCAPHOID FRACTURE

We have assessed the value of using a simple apparatus,the Carpal Box, in patients with suspected scaphoid fracture, to produce elongated and magnified radiographs of the carpus. The interobserver agreement between 60 observers of standard scaphoid radiographs and longitudinal and transverse Carpal Box radiographs (X-CB) was compared in 11 patients. Three-phase bone scanning was used as a comparative standard. If at least 75% of the observers agreed and the result was confirmed by three-phase bone scanning, the outcome was termed reliable. Scaphoid radiographs and the longitudinal X-CB films were reliable in four patients and the transverse X-CB films in six patients. The bone scan suggested a scaphoid fracture in five of the 11 patients. Agreement in the interpretation of the standard scaphoid radiographs was acceptable in only 36% of patients: in interpretation of transverse Carpal Box radiographs this figure increased to 55%.

THE VALUE OF ADDITIONAL CARPAL BOX RADIOGRAPHS IN SUSPECTED SCAPHOID FRACTURE

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Carpal Box (CB) radiographs, transverse and longitudinal, produce elongated and magnified views of the carpus. These radiographs can be used after carpal injury, in addition to conventional scaphoid x-rays. In this study, the use of CB radiographs was evaluated in patients with possible scaphoid fracture. METHODS Seventy-one consecutive patients who presented at the First Aid department from May 1994 to May 1995 were included. All patients were examined for scaphoid fracture after a fall on the out-stretched hand. If a scaphoid fracture was seen on the scaphoid x-rays, patients were immobilized. If the x-rays remained negative or dubious for fracture, additional transverse and longitudinal CB radiographs were obtained. If CB radiographs remained negative or inconclusive, patients were referred for three-phase bone scintigraphy. The results of independent and masked judgment by three different observers were used for an inter- and intraobserver analysis. RESULTS Twenty of 71 patients initially showed a scaphoid fracture on the conventional scaphoid x-rays, 41 were negative, and 10 inconclusive. All 41 negative patients remained negative on CB radiograph; however, the bone scintigraphy was positive for scaphoid fracture in 11 patients and in 9 patients a hot spot elsewhere in the carpus was found. Of the 10 patients with inconclusive x-rays, 2 showed a clear fracture of the scaphoid on CB radiograph, 5 were negative, and 3 remained inconclusive. The agreement between observers, calculated in kappa values, was highest in CB radiographs. CONCLUSIONS In the diagnosis of scaphoid fracture, Carpal Box radiography is of limited value in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture. In two of 10 patients with initial dubious scaphoid x-ray, bone scintigraphy can be avoided. Furthermore, the reliability of the interpretation of the radiographs is increased by additional Carpal Box radiography.

A Post-Traumatic Ankylosis of the Lunate and Scaphoid to the Radius

A case of post-traumatic radiocarpal ankylosis is described.

Carpal instability, the missed diagnosis in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture

To determine the incidence of carpal instability and its relation to clinical findings in patients with suspected scaphoid fracture, we performed a long-term follow-up investigation in a consecutive series of 160 patients who were treated in our department of traumatology for suspected scaphoid fracture after a fall on the outstretched hand. Radiography of the carpus was obtained. Bone scintigraphy was performed in all patients with negative initial radiographs. Follow-up investigation was performed in 100 patients and consisted of history, clinical examination, including measurement of grip strength and wrist movement, synovia stress test, Watsons scaphoid test, and radiographic examination. In 22 patients, clinical or radiological signs of carpal instability were found. The incidence of complaints and a positive synovia test were significantly higher in patients with suspected carpal instability. The bone scan was not useful for the detection or exclusion of carpal instability. The three-phase bone scan gave no additional information in the diagnosis of carpal instability.