A.J. Lederman

Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Malignant Salivary Gland Tumors

Objective Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we investigated the characteristics, outcomes, and benefits of adjuvant therapy for patients diagnosed with malignant salivary gland tumors between 2004 and 2012. Study Design Retrospective analysis. Setting NCDB. Subject and Methods The cases of patients diagnosed with a nonmetastatic major salivary gland tumor who underwent resection between 2004 and 2012 were abstracted from the NCDB. Patients were further included if they had pT1-4NX-1M0 high-grade disease or pT3-4NX-0M0 or pT1-4N1M0 low-grade disease. Patients were identified as having no postoperative radiation therapy or having received postoperative radiation therapy to a dose of 5000 and 7000 cGy to the head and neck region or the parotid region, and their characteristics and outcomes were compared. Results During the study period, 4068 patients met the inclusion criteria for this analysis, of which 2728 (67.1%) received postoperative radiation and 1340 (32.9%) did not. With a median follow-up of 49.1 months, there was a significant improvement in overall survival associated with those receiving postoperative radiation (5 years, 56% vs 50.6%). On multivariable analysis, radiation utilization (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.71-0.86; P < 0.001) and female sex (hazard ratio, 0.88) were associated with improved survival. When the analysis was limited to patients ≤65 years old, the survival benefit was persistent on multivariable analysis. Conclusion In conclusion, in this large NCDB study of 4068 patients with locally advanced malignant salivary gland carcinoma, administering adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved overall survival.

Patterns of care and outcomes of adjuvant therapy for high‐risk head and neck cancer after surgery

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is considered standard of care in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer with positive margins and/or extracapsular extension (ECE).

Comparison of neoadjuvant vs concurrent/adjuvant androgen deprivation in men with high-risk prostate cancer receiving definitive radiation therapy

Purpose It is unknown whether there is a benefit to starting androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) prior to rather than concurrently with definitive radiation therapy in men with high-risk prostate cancer. We studied the National Cancer Data Base to determine whether the timing of ADT impacts survival. Methods Men diagnosed with high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to a dose of 70-81 Gy along with ADT from 2004-2011 were included. Those who started ADT 42-90 days before EBRT were identified as having received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (N-HT) and those who received ADT from 14 days before their radiation until 84 days after the start of EBRT were categorized as receiving concurrent/adjuvant treatment (C-HT). We used the log-rank test to compare Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression to assess the impact of covariables on overall survival (OS). Results Among 11,491 included patients, those receiving N-HT were 1 year older (p<0.001) and more likely to have Gleason 8-10 disease (p = 0.01) and cT3-4 disease (p = 0.002). Men receiving N-HT had a 5-year and median OS of 80.6% and 111.4 months, respectively, compared to 78.3% and 108.9 months, respectively, in those receiving C-HT (p = 0.03). This benefit remained significant on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.96, p = 0.008). Duration of ADT was not available to report. Conclusions External beam radiation therapy with N-HT was associated with improved overall survival compared to C-HT. This study is hypothesis-generating and further studies are needed to best qualify the sequencing of hormone therapy with the duration of treatment.