A. Javaid
University of Delaware
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. Javaid.
Physical Review Letters | 2010
S. Hoover; Nam J; P. Gorham; Grashorn E; P. Allison; S. W. Barwick; J. J. Beatty; K. Belov; D. Besson; W. R. Binns; C.T. Chen; Pisin Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; P. F. Dowkontt; Michael A. DuVernois; R. C. Field; D. Goldstein; Vieregg Ag; C. Hast; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid; J. Kowalski; J. G. Learned; Kurt Liewer; J. T. Link; Elizabeth R. Lusczek; S. Matsuno; B. C. Mercurio; C. Miki
We report the observation of 16 cosmic ray events with a mean energy of 1.5 × 10¹⁹ eV via radio pulses originating from the interaction of the cosmic ray air shower with the Antarctic geomagnetic field, a process known as geosynchrotron emission. We present measurements in the 300-900 MHz range, which are the first self-triggered, first ultrawide band, first far-field, and the highest energy sample of cosmic ray events collected with the radio technique. Their properties are inconsistent with current ground-based geosynchrotron models. The emission is 100% polarized in the plane perpendicular to the projected geomagnetic field. Fourteen events are seen to have a phase inversion due to reflection of the radio beam off the ice surface, and two additional events are seen directly from above the horizon. Based on a likelihood analysis, we estimate angular pointing precision of order 2° for the event arrival directions.
Physical Review D | 2011
M. Detrixhe; D. Besson; P. Gorham; P. Allison; B. Baughmann; J. J. Beatty; K. Belov; Simon Bevan; W. R. Binns; Chun Hsiung Chen; Pisin Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; D. De Marco; P. F. Dowkontt; M. A. DuVernois; C. Frankenfeld; E. Grashorn; D. P. Hogan; N. Griffith; B. Hill; S. Hoover; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid; Kurt Liewer; S. Matsuno; B. C. Mercurio; C. Miki; M. Mottram; J. W. Nam
We have conducted a search for extended energy deposition trails left by ultrarelativistic magnetic monopoles interacting in Antarctic ice. The nonobservation of any satisfactory candidates in the 31 days of accumulated ANITA-II (Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna) flight data results in an upper limit on the diffuse flux of relativistic monopoles. We obtain a 90% C.L. limit of order 10{sup -19} (cm{sup 2} s sr){sup -1} for values of Lorentz factor, {gamma}, 10{sup 10{<=}{gamma}} at the anticipated energy E{sub tot}=10{sup 16} GeV. This bound is stronger than all previously published experimental limits for this kinematic range.
Radio Science | 2015
D. Besson; J. Stockham; M. Sullivan; P. Allison; J. J. Beatty; K. Belov; W. R. Binns; Chun Hsiung Chen; Pisin Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; P. F. Dowkontt; P. Gorham; S. Hoover; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid; K. M. Liewer; S. Matsuno; C. Miki; M. Mottram; J. W. Nam; C. J. Naudet; R. J. Nichol; A. Romero‐Wolf; L. Ruckman; D. Saltzberg; D. Seckel; R. Y. Shang; M. Stockham; G. Varner
We describe herein a measurement of the Antarctic surface “roughness” performed by the balloon-borne ANITA (Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna) experiment. Originally purposed for cosmic ray astrophysics, the radio frequency (RF) receiver ANITA gondola, from its 38 km altitude vantage point, can scan a disk of snow surface 600 km in radius. The primary purpose of ANITA is to detect RF emissions from cosmic rays incident on Antarctica, such as neutrinos which penetrate through the atmosphere and interact within the ice, resulting in signal directed upward which then refracts at the ice-air interface and up and out to ANITA, or high-energy nuclei (most likely irons or protons), which interact in the upper atmosphere (at altitudes below ANITA) and produce a spray of down-coming RF which reflects off the snow surface and back up to the gondola. The energy of such high-energy nuclei can be inferred from the observed reflected signal only if the surface reflectivity is known. We describe herein an attempt to quantify the Antarctic surface reflectivity, using the Sun as a constant, unpolarized RF source. We find that the reflectivity of the surface generally follows the expectations from the Fresnel equations, lending support to the use of those equations to give an overall correction factor to calculate cosmic ray energies for all locations in Antarctica. The analysis described below is based on ANITA-II data. After launching from McMurdo Station in December 2008, ANITA-II was aloft for a period of 31 days with a typical instantaneous duty cycle exceeding 95%.
The Astrophysical Journal | 2011
A. G. Vieregg; K. Palladino; P. Allison; B. M. Baughman; J. J. Beatty; K. Belov; D. Besson; S. Bevan; W. R. Binns; C.T. Chen; Pisin Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; M. Detrixhe; D. De Marco; P. F. Dowkontt; M. DuVernois; P. Gorham; Grashorn E; B. Hill; S. Hoover; M.A. Huang; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid; Kurt Liewer; S. Matsuno; B. C. Mercurio; C. Miki; M. Mottram; J. W. Nam
We set the first limits on the ultra-high energy (UHE) neutrino fluence at energies greater than 10{sup 9} GeV from gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) based on data from the second flight of the Antarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna (ANITA). During the 31 day flight of ANITA-II, 26 GRBs were recorded by Swift or Fermi. Of these, we analyzed the 12 GRBs which occurred during quiet periods when the payload was away from anthropogenic activity. In a blind analysis, we observe 0 events on a total background of 0.0044 events in the combined prompt window for all 12 low-background bursts. We also observe 0 events from the remaining 14 bursts. We place a 90% confidence level limit on the E{sup -4} prompt neutrino fluence between 10{sup 8} GeV < E < 10{sup 12} GeV of E{sup 4}{Phi} = 2.5 x 10{sup 17} GeV{sup 3} cm{sup -2} from GRB090107A. This is the first reported limit on the UHE neutrino fluence from GRBs above 10{sup 9} GeV, and the strongest limit above 10{sup 8} GeV.
arXiv: High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena | 2017
A. Romero-Wolf; J. W. Nam; S. Hoover; P. Gorham; P. Allison; L. Batten; J. J. Beatty; K. Belov; D. Besson; W. R. Binns; P. Cao; Chun Hsiung Chen; P. Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; B. Dailey; C. Deaconu; L. Cremonesi; P. F. Dowkontt; M. A. DuVernois; R. C. Field; D. Goldstein; J. Gordon; C. Hast; C. L. Hebert; B. Hill; K. Hughes; R. Hupe; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid
These proceedings address a recent publication by the ANITA collaboration of four upward- pointing cosmic-ray-like events observed in the first flight of ANITA. Three of these events were consistent with stratospheric cosmic-ray air showers where the axis of propagation does not inter- sect the surface of the Earth. The fourth event was consistent with a primary particle that emerges from the surface of the ice suggesting a possible {\tau}-lepton decay as the origin of this event. These proceedings follow-up on the modeling and testing of the hypothesis that this event was of {\tau} neutrino origin.
Modern Physics Letters A | 2008
J. W. Nam; P. Gorham; S. W. Barwick; J. J. Beatty; D. Besson; W. R. Binns; Chih-Ching Chen; Pisin Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; P. F. Dowkontt; Michael A. DuVernois; R. C. Field; D. Goldstein; A. Goodhue; C. Hast; C. L. Hebert; S. Hoover; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid; J. Kowalski; J. G. Learned; Kurt Liewer; J. T. Link; Elizabeth R. Lusczek; S. Matsuno; B. C. Mercurio; C. Miki; P. Miočinović; C. J. Naudet
The ANITA (ANtarctic Impulsive Transient Antenna) experiment is a balloon-borne neutrino telescope which consists of an array of 32 broad-band horn antennas. It successfully completed a 35 day flight over Antarctica during the 2006-2007 austral summer. The primary goal of ANITA is to search for astrophysical neutrinos with energies E > 1019eV by detecting radio Cherenkov signals from neutrino induced showers in the Antarctic ice. We present preliminary results from ongoing analyses of ANITA data.
Physical Review D | 2012
P. Gorham; P. Allison; B. M. Baughman; J. J. Beatty; K. Belov; D. Besson; Simon Bevan; W. R. Binns; Chun Hsiung Chen; Pisin Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; M. Detrixhe; D. De Marco; P. F. Dowkontt; M. A. DuVernois; E. Grashorn; B. Hill; S. Hoover; M.A. Huang; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid; Kurt Liewer; S. Matsuno; B. C. Mercurio; C. Miki; M. Mottram; J. W. Nam; R. J. Nichol; K. Palladino
Astroparticle Physics | 2016
H. Schoorlemmer; K. Belov; Andrew Romero-Wolf; Daniel García-Fernández; V. Bugaev; Stephanie Wissel; P. Allison; J. Alvarez-Muñiz; S. W. Barwick; J. J. Beatty; D. Besson; W. R. Binns; Washington Rodrigues de Carvalho; Chun Hsiung Chen; Pisin Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; P. F. Dowkontt; M. DuVernois; R.C. Field; D. Goldstein; P. Gorham; C. Hast; T. Huege; C.L. Heber; S. Hoover; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid; J. Kowalski; J. Lam
Physical Review Letters | 2016
P. Gorham; J. W. Nam; Andrew Romero-Wolf; S. Hoover; P. Allison; O. Banerjee; J. J. Beatty; K. Belov; D. Besson; W. R. Binns; V. Bugaev; P. Cao; Chun Hsiung Chen; P. Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; B. Dailey; C. Deaconu; L. Cremonesi; P.F. Dowkontt; M. A. DuVernois; R. C. Field; B. D. Fox; D. Goldstein; J. Gordon; C. Hast; C. L. Hebert; B. Hill; K. Hughes; R. Hupe
Astroparticle Physics | 2015
Andrew Romero-Wolf; S. Hoover; A. G. Vieregg; P. Gorham; P. Allison; S. W. Barwick; B. M. Baughman; J. J. Beatty; K. Belov; D. Besson; Simon Bevan; W. R. Binns; Chun Hsiung Chen; Pisin Chen; J. Clem; A. Connolly; M. Detrixhe; D. De Marco; P. F. Dowkontt; M. A. DuVernois; D. Goldstein; E. Grashorn; B. Hill; M. H. Huang; M. H. Israel; A. Javaid; J. Kowalski; J. G. Learned; Kurt Liewer; S. Matsuno