A.K. Davis
University of Rochester
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A.K. Davis.
Physics of Plasmas | 2016
S. X. Hu; D.T. Michel; A.K. Davis; R. Betti; P. B. Radha; E.M. Campbell; D. H. Froula; C. Stoeckl
Understanding the effects of laser imprint on target performance is critical to the success of direct-drive inertial confinement fusion. Directly measuring the disruption caused by laser imprints to the imploding shell and hot-spot formation, in comparison with multidimensional radiation–hydrodynamic simulations, can provide a clear picture of how laser nonuniformities cause target performance to degrade. With the recently developed x-ray self-emission imaging technique and the state-of-the-art physics models recently implemented in the two-dimensional hydrocode DRACO, a systematic study of laser-imprint effects on warm target implosions on OMEGA has been performed using both experimental results and simulations. By varying the laser-picket intensity, the imploding shells were set at different adiabats (from α = 2 to α = 6). As the shell adiabats decreased, it was observed that (1) the measured shell thickness at the time the hot spot lit up became larger than the uniform one-dimensional (1-D) predictions...
Physics of Plasmas | 2016
A.K. Davis; D. Cao; D.T. Michel; M. Hohenberger; D. H. Edgell; R. Epstein; V.N. Goncharov; S. X. Hu; Igor V. Igumenshchev; J.A. Marozas; A. V. Maximov; J. F. Myatt; P. B. Radha; S. P. Regan; T. C. Sangster; D. H. Froula
The angularly resolved mass ablation rates and ablation-front trajectories for Si-coated CH targets were measured in direct-drive inertial confinement fusion experiments to quantify cross-beam energy transfer (CBET) while constraining the hydrodynamic coupling. A polar-direct-drive laser configuration, where the equatorial laser beams were dropped and the polar beams were repointed from a symmetric direct-drive configuration, was used to limit CBET at the pole while allowing it to persist at the equator. The combination of low- and high-CBET conditions observed in the same implosion allowed for the effects of CBET on the ablation rate and ablation pressure to be determined. Hydrodynamic simulations performed without CBET agreed with the measured ablation rate and ablation-front trajectory at the pole of the target, confirming that the CBET effects on the pole are small. The simulated mass ablation rates and ablation-front trajectories were in excellent agreement with the measurements at all angles when a ...
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion | 2015
D.T. Michel; R. S. Craxton; A.K. Davis; R. Epstein; V. Yu. Glebov; V.N. Goncharov; S. X. Hu; I.V. Igumenshchev; D. D. Meyerhofer; P. B. Radha; T. C. Sangster; W. Seka; C. Stoeckl; D. H. Froula
Increasing the ablation pressure is a path to achieving cryogenic implosion performance on the OMEGA laser that will hydrodynamically scale to ignition on the National Ignition Facility. An increased ablation pressure will allow a more-massive shell (i.e. thicker and more hydrodynamically stable) and a higher adiabat to achieve ignition-relevant velocities (>3.5 × 107 cm s−1), areal densities (>300 mg cm−2) and hot-spot pressures (>100 Gbar). Two approaches have demonstrated increased ablation pressure: (1) a target design is shown that uses a Be ablator to increase the hydrodynamic efficiency, resulting in a ~10% increase in the ablation pressure, in comparison to a CH ablator; (2) reducing the beam size is shown to recover all of the ablation pressure lost to cross-beam energy transfer (CBET), i.e. the ablation pressure calculated without CBET, but the degraded illumination uniformity reduces the integrated target performance. The hydrodynamic efficiency is measured for the current cryogenic design, multiple ablator material design and CH capsule designs with various beam focal-spot sizes. In each case, an excellent agreement is observed with 1D hydrodynamic simulations that include CBET and nonlocal heat-transport models.
Physical Review E | 2017
D.T. Michel; S. X. Hu; A.K. Davis; V. Yu. Glebov; V.N. Goncharov; I.V. Igumenshchev; P. B. Radha; C. Stoeckl; D. H. Froula
A series of direct-drive implosions performed on OMEGA were used to isolate the effect of an adiabat on the in-flight shell thickness. The maximum in-flight shell thickness was measured to decrease from 75±2 to 60±2μm when the adiabat of the shell was reduced from 6 to 4.5, but when decreasing the adiabat further (1.8), the shell thickness increased to 75±2μm due to the growth of the Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Hydrodynamic simulations suggest that a laser imprint is the dominant seed for these nonuniformities.
Physics of Plasmas | 2018
D. Cao; T. R. Boehly; M. C. Gregor; D. N. Polsin; A.K. Davis; P. B. Radha; S. P. Regan; V.N. Goncharov
Using temporally shaped laser pulses, multiple shocks can be launched in direct-drive inertial confinement fusion implosion experiments to set the shell on a desired isentrope or adiabat. The velocity of the first shock and the times at which subsequent shocks catch up to it are measured through the velocity interferometry system for any reflector diagnostic [T. R. Boehly et al., Phys. Plasmas 18, 092706 (2011)] on OMEGA [T. R. Boehly et al., Opt. Commun. 133, 495 (1997)]. Simulations reproduce these velocity and shock-merger time measurements when using laser pulses designed for setting mid-adiabat (α ∼ 3) implosions, but agreement degrades for lower-adiabat (α ∼ 1) designs. Simulation results indicate that the shock timing discrepancy is most sensitive to details of the density and temperature profiles in the coronal plasma, which influences the laser energy coupled into the target, and only marginally sensitive to the target offset and beam power imbalance. To aid in verifying the coronal profiles inf...
Physical Review E | 2018
W. L. Shang; C. Stoeckl; R. Betti; S. P. Regan; T. C. Sangster; S. X. Hu; A. R. Christopherson; V. Gopalaswamy; D. Cao; W. Seka; D.T. Michel; A.K. Davis; P. B. Radha; F. J. Marshall; R. Epstein; A. A. Solodov
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2016
D. H. Froula; R.K. Follett; R.J. Henchen; A.K. Davis; V.N. Goncharov; D. H. Edgell; A. A. Solodov; D.T. Michel; J.F. Myatt; J.G. Shaw; C. Stoeckl
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2016
A.K. Davis; D.T. Michel; A. Sefkow; Y.H. Ding; R. Epstein; S. X. Hu; J. P. Knauer; D. H. Froula
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2016
A. R. Christopherson; R. Betti; J. Howard; A. Bose; C.J. Forrest; W. Theobald; E.M. Campbell; J. A. Delettrez; C. Stoeckl; D. H. Edgell; W. Seka; A.K. Davis; D.T. Michel; V. Yu. Glebov; Wei
Bulletin of the American Physical Society | 2016
D.T. Michel; S. X. Hu; P. B. Radha; A.K. Davis; R. S. Craxton; V. Yu. Glebov; V.N. Goncharov; I.V. Igumenshchev; C. Stoeckl; D. H. Froula