A. Masin

Short-term sacral nerve stimulation for functional anorectal and urinary disturbances: results in 40 patients: evaluation of a new option for anorectal functional disorders.

PURPOSE: There are several options in the treatment of fecal incontinence; it is often difficult to choose the most appropriate, adequate treatment. The consolidated experience gained in the urologic field suggests that sacral nerve stimulation may be a further option in the choice of treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the preliminary results of the peripheral nerve evaluation test obtained in a multicenter collaborative study on patients with defecatory and urinary disturbances. METHODS: Forty patients (9 males; mean age, 50.2; range, 26–79 years) underwent the peripheral nerve evaluation test, 28 (70 percent) for fecal incontinence and 12 (30 percent) for chronic constipation. Fourteen (35 percent) patients also had urinary incontinence; six had urge incontinence, two had stress incontinence, and six had retention incontinence. Associated diseases were scleroderma (2 patients), spinal injuries (4 patients), and syringomyelia (1 patient). All the patients underwent preliminary investigations with anorectal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing, anal ultrasound, defecography, and if required, urodynamic tests. The electrode for sacral nerve stimulation was positioned percutaneously under local anesthesia in the S2 (4), S3 (34), or S4 (1) foramen unilaterally (1 patient not accounted for because of no response to acute test), based on the best motor and subjective responses of paresthesia of the pelvic floor. Stimulation parameters were average amplitude, 2.8 (range, 1–6) V and average frequency, 15 to 25 Hz. RESULTS: The mean duration of the tests was 9.9 (range, 7–30) days; tests lasting fewer than seven days were not evaluated. There were four early displacements of the electrode. In 22 of the 25 evaluable patients with fecal incontinence, there was an improvement of symptoms (88 percent), and 11 (44 percent) were completely continent to liquid or solid stools, whereas in 7 symptoms were unchanged. Mean number of episodes of liquid or solid stool incontinence per week was 8.1 (range, 4–18) in the prestimulation period and 1.7 (range, 0–12) during the peripheral nerve evaluation test. (P=0.001; Wilcoxons signed-rank test). The most important manometric findings were: increase of maximum rest pressure (39.4 ± 7.3vs. 54.3 ± 8.5 mmHg;P=0.014, Wilcoxons test) and maximum squeeze pressure (84.7 ± 8.8vs. 99.5 ± 1.1 mmHg;P=0.047), reduction of initial threshold (63.6 ± 5.2vs. 42.4 ± 4.7 ml;P=0.041) and urge sensation (123.8 ± 0.6vs. 78.3 ± 8.9 ml;P=0.05). An improvement was also found in patients with constipation, with reduction in difficulty emptying the rectum, with prestimulation at 7 (range, 2–21) episodes per week and end of peripheral nerve evaluation test at 2.1 (range, 0–6) episodes per week, (P<0.01) and in the number of unsuccessful visits to the toilet, which dropped from 29.2 (7–24) to 6.7 (0–28) per week (P=0.01). The most important manometric findings in constipated patients were an increase in amplitude of maximum squeeze pressure during sacral nerve stimulation (prestimulation, 63 ± 0 mm Hg; end of peripheral nerve evaluation test, 78 ± 1 mm Hg;P=0.009) and a reduction in rectal volume for urge threshold (prestimulation, 189 ± 52 ml; end of peripheral nerve evaluation test, 139 ± 45 ml;P= 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In functional bowel disorders short-term sacral nerve stimulation seems to be a useful diagnostic tool to assess patients for a minor invasive therapy alternative to conventional surgical procedure.

Neuromodulation for fecal incontinence: Outcome in 16 patients with definitive implant

PURPOSE: Sacral nerve modulation appears to offer a valid treatment option for some patients with fecal incontinence and functional defects of the internal anal sphincter or of the striated muscle. METHODS: Sixteen patients with fecal incontinence (4 males; mean age, 51.4 (range, 27–79) years) with intact or surgically repaired (n=1) anal sphincter underwent permanent sacral nerve stimulation implant. Cause was traumatic in two patients, and associated disorders included scleroderma (2 patients) and spastic paraparesis (1 patient); eight (50 percent) of the patients also had urinary incontinence, and two (12.5 percent) had nonobstructive urinary retention. All patients were selected on the basis of positive findings from at least one peripheral nerve evaluation. The stimulating electrode was positioned in the S2 (1 patient), S3 (14 patients), or S4 (1 patient) sacral foramen. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 15.5 (range, 3–45) months. Mean preimplant Williams score decreased from 4.1±0.9 (range, 2–5) to 1.25±0.5 (range, 1–2) (P=0.01, Wilcoxon test), and the number of incontinence accidents for liquid or solid stool in 14 days decreased from 11.5±4.8 (range, 2–20) before implant to 0.6±0.9 (range, 0–2) at the last follow-up. Important manometric data were an increase in mean maximal pressure at rest of 37.7±14.9 mmHg (implantable pulse generator 49.1±18.7,P=0.04) and in mean maximal pressure during squeeze (prestimulation 67.3±21.1 mmHg, implantable pulse generator 82.6±21.0,P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation can be considered an option for fecal incontinence. However, an accurate clinical and instrumental evaluation and careful patient selection are required to optimize outcome.

Is Sacral Nerve Stimulation an Effective Treatment for Chronic Idiopathic Anal Pain

BACKGROUND: Chronic idiopathic anal pain is a common, benign symptom, the etiology of which remains unclear. Traditional treatments are often ineffective. This study investigated the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation in treating chronic idiopathic anal pain. METHODS: Twelve patients (10 women and 2 men; mean age, 61.0 ± 10.3 years; range, 48-82 years) implanted with a permanent device for sacral nerve stimulation were followed in the Italian Group for Sacral Neuromodulation (GINS) Registry. All patients had frequent chronic anal or perianal pain; 75 percent had previously undergone pelvic surgery. Pharmacologic and rehabilitative therapy had yielded poor results. Changes from baseline to last follow-up examination were evaluated for scores on a visual analog pain scale (0-10) and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) health status questionnaire. Manometric measurements recordered at last follow-up were compared with preimplantation values. RESULTS: In one patient, the permanent device was removed because of technical failure. After a mean follow-up of 15 (range, 3-80) months, visual analog pain scores had significantly improved (from 8.2 ± 1.7 to 2.2 ± 1.3, P < 0.001). SF-36 physical component scores increased from 26.27 ± 5.65 to 38.95 ± 9.08, P < 0.02). Scores on the mental component showed improvement, although not significant. Postimplantation changes in manometric functional data were not significant, but sensitivity thresholds showed a considerable decrease. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up data showing improvements in scores on the visual analog pain scale and quality of life questionnaire indicate that, before adopting more aggressive surgical procedures, SNS should be considered for patients with chronic idiopathic anal pain in whom pharmacologic and biofeedback treatments have failed to produce effective results.

Do Geographic and Educational Factors Influence the Quality of Life in Rectal Cancer Patients With a Permanent Colostomy

PURPOSEThis study was designed to evaluate possible social and geographic factors that could have an impact on quality of life in patients after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Although the number of patients with rectal cancer who need to be treated with abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and construction of permanent colostomy has greatly decreased in the past, there is still controversy about the influence on quality of life caused by this procedure.METHODSIn a prospective trial, patients operated on for low rectal cancer by abdominoperineal excision of the rectum were evaluated by a quality of life questionnaire, modified from The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons questionnaire, to assess fecal incontinence. The results for the four domains of quality of life (lifestyle, coping behavior, embarrassment, depression), as well as for subjective general health, were evaluated with regard to age, gender, education, and geographic origin in univariate and multivariate analyses.RESULTSThirteen institutions in 11 countries included data from 257 patients. Although the analysis of general health did not reveal any significant differences, the analysis of the four quality of life domains showed the significant influence of geographic origin. The presence of a permanent colostomy showed a consistently negative impact on patients in southern Europe as well as for patients of Arabic (Islamic) origin. On the other hand, age, gender, and educational status did not reveal a statistically significant influence.CONCLUSIONSThis is the first study to show the influence of geographic origin on quality of life of patients with a permanent colostomy. Possible factors that may influence the outcome of patients after surgical treatment of rectal cancer, such as weather, religion, or culture, should be taken into account when quality of life evaluations are considered.

Reliability of electrophysiologic anal tests in predicting the outcome of sacral nerve modulation for fecal incontinence

INTRODUCTION:Sacral nerve modulation has been demonstrated to be a new efficacious treatment for fecal incontinence. The effectiveness of the procedure is preliminarily tested by means of a peripheral nerve evaluation. Integrity of the sacral neural pathway is generally believed to be a necessary condition for a good response, but no data are available to confirm whether electrophysiologic anal tests are predictive of the clinical outcome of the peripheral nerve evaluation.METHODS:Eighty-two incontinent patients underwent the peripheral nerve evaluation after full evaluation of the anorectal physiology. Univariate analysis was performed, and the positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for each of the tests.RESULTS:Forty-six patients had successful results to the peripheral nerve evaluation and were subjected to permanent implant of a sacral electrostimulator. Anal sphincter electromyography had been performed in 60 patients, whereas pudendal nerve terminal motor latency had been assessed in 68 and evoked sacral potentials in 29 patients. Anal electromyography was statistically related to the outcome of the peripheral nerve evaluation (P = 0.0004) with a positive predictive value of 81 percent, a sensitivity of 44 percent, and a specificity of 81 percent. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency on the right side did not correlate with the outcome, but left pudendal nerve terminal motor latency was weakly correlated (P = 0.02), although both tests had a low positive predicting value and sensitivity vs. good specificity. Evoked sacral potentials did not correlate with the outcome and had a low positive predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity.CONCLUSIONS:Simple anal sphincter electromyography can predict the outcome of the peripheral nerve evaluation with good positive predictive value and specificity in patients with fecal incontinence. Other, more expensive, electrophysiologic anal tests do not add further prognostic information.

Role of proctography in severe constipation

As referred to in the literature, patients complaining of constipation may have a spastic or, in the case of chronic straining, weak pelvic floor. Twenty-two severely constipated patients who did not improve after a high fiber diet were submitted to whole gut transit time (TT), proctographic, and anorectal manometric studies. A control group consisting of five subjects for TT, five subjects for proctogram, and ten subjects for manometry was also studied. Transit time was delayed (P< 0.001) in all patients. Manometry in the constipated group showed a high rectal threshold (64.1vs.17.1 ml of air,P< 0.01), but no other significant difference. Proctograms in 10 of 22 patients (Group A) showed no differences in the anorectal angle (ARA) and in its distance from the pubococcygeal line (DLPC) in respect to the control group; 12 of 22 patients (Group B) had a paradoxical closure of the ARA at straining in respect to resting position (101.2†vs.120.1†), and a higher DLPC than Group A and the control group in all positions studied. There was no difference in TT for rectal stasis of radiopaque markers between the two pathologic groups. Patients in Group B were older than patients in Group A (55.3vs.42.9 years,P<0.05). In conclusion, proctograms showed alterations of the pelvic floor, but there was no correlation between proctographic data and rectal or colonic stasis of the radiopaque markers, or clinic severity of constipation, but a correlation between ages did exist.