A. Nazac

Comparaison de la fertiloscopie à la cœlioscopie dans l’exploration de l’infertilité : analyse de la littérature

BACKGROUND Fertiloscopy is a recent technique designed to explore the tubo-ovarian axis in unexplained infertility. It is a simple outpatient technique, allowing to perform operative procedures, but its position relative to laparoscopy is yet to be defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS A thorough and extensive bibliographical search was undertaken to fully embrace the question, challenging Medline at the National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Health Technology Assessment Database. All the retrieved articles were classified as either descriptive or comparative studies and evaluated on a set of criteria. RESULTS Most of the papers described case series coming from a few teams, focusing mainly on the technical aspect of the procedure, like the access rate to the posterior cul-de-sac, the success rate in visualizing the pelvis, the complications rate (mainly rectal perforation), and its operative performance in drilling ovaries for resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome. Comparative studies numbered six trials. They all followed the same design, fertiloscopy preceding conventional laparoscopy in patients taken as their own control. The concordance rate between the two modalities reaches 80% in terms of tubal pathology, adherences and endometriosis, with an estimated reduction of laparoscopies varying from 40% to 93%. CONCLUSION The current literature shows a concordance between fertiloscopy and conventional laparoscopic findings for certain parameters in cases of tubal pathology, adherences and endometriosis. The relative positions of these two modalities in unexplained infertility still remain elusive.

Fertilité après résection hystéroscopique de myomes sous-muqueux chez des patientes infertiles

OBJECTIVES Myoma is the most frequent benign uterine tumor and might have a negative impact on fertility. In 5 to 10% of cases, infertility is associated with myoma and in 1 to 3% myoma is the only infertility factor. Even if effect of myomectomy on fertility is controversial, benefit of hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal myoma on fertility has already been shown. The aim of this study is to evaluate fertility of infertile women less than 46years old after hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective unicentric study took place in the gynecologic unit of a teaching hospital. All infertile women with a hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal myoma between March 2009 and May 2013 were included. A phone questionnaire was conducted to evaluate pregnancy rate, eventual medical assistance, time between submucisal resection and pregnancy and issue of pregnancies. RESULTS Seventy-one infertile women with a hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myoma were included. Pregnancy rate was 33.8% with 50% of live births, 41.6% of miscarriages and 8.4% of late fetal losses with a mean follow-up of 28.7months. Mean time between hysteroscopic resection and pregnancy was 9.9months. A medical assistance was necessary for 6 women (25% of pregnancy). CONCLUSION This study reports hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myoma for infertile women. The rate of pregnancy after treatment is 33.8%.

État des connaissancesComparaison de la fertiloscopie à la cœlioscopie dans l’exploration de l’infertilité : analyse de la littératureComparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in the exploration of the infertility: Analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND Fertiloscopy is a recent technique designed to explore the tubo-ovarian axis in unexplained infertility. It is a simple outpatient technique, allowing to perform operative procedures, but its position relative to laparoscopy is yet to be defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS A thorough and extensive bibliographical search was undertaken to fully embrace the question, challenging Medline at the National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Health Technology Assessment Database. All the retrieved articles were classified as either descriptive or comparative studies and evaluated on a set of criteria. RESULTS Most of the papers described case series coming from a few teams, focusing mainly on the technical aspect of the procedure, like the access rate to the posterior cul-de-sac, the success rate in visualizing the pelvis, the complications rate (mainly rectal perforation), and its operative performance in drilling ovaries for resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome. Comparative studies numbered six trials. They all followed the same design, fertiloscopy preceding conventional laparoscopy in patients taken as their own control. The concordance rate between the two modalities reaches 80% in terms of tubal pathology, adherences and endometriosis, with an estimated reduction of laparoscopies varying from 40% to 93%. CONCLUSION The current literature shows a concordance between fertiloscopy and conventional laparoscopic findings for certain parameters in cases of tubal pathology, adherences and endometriosis. The relative positions of these two modalities in unexplained infertility still remain elusive.