A. P. S. Hungin
Durham University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. P. S. Hungin.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2002
Peter Malfertheiner; Francis Mégraud; Colm O'Morain; A. P. S. Hungin; Roger Jones; A. T. R. Axon; David Y. Graham; Guido N. J. Tytgat
Significant progress and new insights have been gained in the 4 years since the first Maastricht Consensus Report, necessitating an update of the original guidelines. To achieve this, the European Helicobacter Pylori Study Group organized a meeting of specialists and experts from around the world, representatives from National Gastroenterology Societies and general practitioners from Europe to establish updated guidelines on the current management of Helicobacter pylori infection. The meeting took place on 21–22 September 2000.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2003
A. P. S. Hungin; Peter J. Whorwell; Jan Tack; Fermín Mearin
Aim : To determine the prevalence, symptom pattern and impact of the irritable bowel syndrome, across eight European countries, using a standardized methodology.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2005
A. P. S. Hungin; Lin Chang; G. R. Locke; E. H. Dennis; V. Barghout
Background : The impact of irritable bowel syndrome, a gastrointestinal motility disorder, is underestimated and poorly quantified, as clinicians may see only a minority of sufferers.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2000
G. P. Rubin; A. P. S. Hungin; P. J. Kelly
Inflammatory bowel diseases have significant long‐term morbidity and healthcare resource consequences. Studies based on secondary care records may have underestimated the contribution of general practitioners (GPs) to its management.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2004
Gregory Rubin; A. P. S. Hungin; David Chinn; D. Dwarakanath
Background : The current understanding of quality of life impairment in inflammatory bowel disease has largely been derived from selected populations and may not reflect the experience of patients in the community, where fewer than half are likely to be under specialist care.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2004
A. S. Raghunath; A. P. S. Hungin; D. Wooff; S. Childs
Background : The effect of Helicobacter pylori in provoking or protecting against gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease is unclear and studies have given conflicting results. Recent guidelines recommend H. pylori eradication in patients on long‐term proton pump inhibitors.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2007
G. N. J. Tytgat; K. E. L. Mccoll; Jan Tack; Gerald Holtmann; Richard H. Hunt; Peter Malfertheiner; A. P. S. Hungin; H. K Batchelor
Background Gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with a variety of typical and atypical symptoms. Patients often present in the first instance to a pharmacist or primary care physician and are subsequently referred to secondary care if initial management fails. Guidelines usually do not provide a clear guidance for all healthcare professionals with whom the patient may consult.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2009
A. P. S. Hungin; C. Hill; A. S. Raghunath
Background Upper gastrointestinal symptoms impose a substantial illness burden and management costs. Understanding perceptions and reasons for seeking healthcare is a prerequisite for meeting patients’ needs effectively.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2005
J. Mason; A. P. S. Hungin
For the vast majority of patients with gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease appropriate care involves the management of symptoms with lifestyle advice and drugs. However, there is dissension about the appropriate use of endoscopy, whether drugs should be stepped up or down according to potency, how long drugs should be used for, the role of lifestyle advice, and, related to this, the role of patients’ lifestyle choices.
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | 2002
Gregory Rubin; A. P. S. Hungin; David Chinn; A. D. Dwarakanath; L. Green; J. Bates
Background : There is evidence from case–control studies that aminosalicylate drugs can reduce colorectal cancer risk by 75–81% in patients with ulcerative colitis. Patients may fail to comply with long‐term therapies, however, or may have been advised to discontinue treatment once in remission.