A. van Hinsberg
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A. van Hinsberg.
Ecological Applications | 2010
W. de Vries; G.W.W. Wamelink; H.F. van Dobben; J. Kros; G.J. Reinds; J.P. Mol-Dijkstra; Simon M. Smart; Chris D. Evans; Ed Rowe; S. Belyazid; Harald Sverdrup; A. van Hinsberg; Maximilian Posch; J.P. Hettelingh; T. Spranger; Roland Bobbink
Field observations and experimental data of effects of nitrogen (N) deposition on plant species diversity have been used to derive empirical critical N loads for various ecosystems. The great advantage of such an approach is the inclusion of field evidence, but there are also restrictions, such as the absence of explicit criteria regarding significant effects on the vegetation, and the impossibility to predict future impacts when N deposition changes. Model approaches can account for this. In this paper, we review the possibilities of static and dynamic multispecies models in combination with dynamic soil-vegetation models to (1) predict plant species composition as a function of atmospheric N deposition and (2) calculate critical N loads in relation to a prescribed protection level of the species composition. The similarities between the models are presented, but also several important differences, including the use of different indicators for N and acidity and the prediction of individual plant species vs. plant communities. A summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the various models, including their validation status, is given. Furthermore, examples are given of critical load calculations with the model chains and their comparison with empirical critical N loads. We show that linked biogeochemistry-biodiversity models for N have potential for applications to support European policy to reduce N input, but the definition of damage thresholds for terrestrial biodiversity represents a major challenge. There is also a clear need for further testing and validation of the models against long-term monitoring or long-term experimental data sets and against large-scale survey data. This requires a focused data collection in Europe, combing vegetation descriptions with variables affecting the species diversity, such as soil acidity, nutrient status and water availability. Finally, there is a need for adaptation and upscaling of the models beyond the regions for which dose-response relationships have been parameterized, to make them generally applicable.
Ecosystems | 2006
H.F. van Dobben; A. van Hinsberg; E.P.A.G. Schouwenberg; M.J.W. Jansen; J.P. Mol-Dijkstra; H.J.J. Wieggers; J. Kros; W. de Vries
This paper describes a new method to derive nitrogen critical loads for vegetation, and its application to The Netherlands. An ‘inverted’ form of the soil chemical model SMART2 was used to estimate atmospheric nitrogen deposition at the critical conditions for 139 terrestrial vegetation types (associations) occurring in northwestern Europe, using an iterative search procedure. The critical conditions are the lower end of the pH range, and the upper end of the nitrogen availability range for each vegetation type. The critical load is assumed to be the nitrogen deposition that results in the critical conditions. The critical load values were subjected to a sensitivity and uncertainty analysis. Sensitivity analysis showed that the estimated critical N load mainly depends on the vegetation type and to a lesser extent on the soil type and the critical N availability. Of these variables N availability, which was estimated from Ellenberg’s indicator scale, contributes most to the uncertainty. The critical load averaged over all vegetation types and soil types is estimated to be 23 ± 7 kg N ha−1y−1. This is a rather reliable value because its uncertainty is small and it is in agreement with empirical estimates of critical loads. Critical loads per vegetation type are less reliable because they are not correlated to empirical values, although the ranges of simulated and empirical values usually overlap. At the site level, uncertainty becomes very large and it is not possible to determine critical loads with any practical significance. The uncertainties can only be reduced if more data become available on the abiotic response per species under field conditions, at least to nitrogen availability and soil pH.
Critical Loads and Dynamic Risk Assessments: Nitrogen, Acidity and Metals in Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecosystems, Environmental Pollution | 2015
H.F. van Dobben; A. van Hinsberg; D. Bal; J.P. Mol-Dijkstra; H.J.J. Wieggers; J. Kros; W. de Vries
A method is presented to simulate nitrogen (N) critical load values per vegetation type in the Netherlands following the method outlined in Chap. 3 and to integrate these simulated critical loads with empirical values to unique values per habitat type as defined in the European Habitats Directive. In this way critical loads are generated that (a) can be used as local deposition targets to comply with the Habitats Directive, and (b) have a broad international support.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology | 2007
W. de Vries; H. Kros; G.J. Reinds; W. Wamelink; J.P. Mol; H.F. van Dobben; Roland Bobbink; Bridget A. Emmett; Simon M. Smart; Chris D. Evans; A. Schlutow; Philipp Kraft; S. Belyazid; Harald Sverdrup; A. van Hinsberg; Maximilian Posch; J.P. Hettelingh
Food and Chemical Toxicology | 2006
T.J. de Koeijer; K.H.M. van Bommel; M.L.P. van Esbroek; Rolf A. Groeneveld; A. van Hinsberg; M.J.S.M. Reijnen; M.N. van Wijk
Evaluation for Participation and Sustainability in Planning | 2011
Frans Sijtsma; C.M. van der Heide; A. van Hinsberg
Routledge studies in ecological economics | 2013
Frans Sijtsma; Hans Farjon; S. van Tol; Peter van Kampen; A.E. Buijs; A. van Hinsberg
Critical load, dynamic modelling and impact assessment in Europe | 2008
A. van Hinsberg; Rien Reijnen; P.W. Goedhart; B. de Knegt; M.L.P. van Esbroek
Small Ruminant Research | 2012
R. van Oostenbrugge; P.M. van Egmond; E. Dammers; A. van Hinsberg; T.C.P. Melman; J. Vader; W.A. Wiersinga; W. van der Bilt; H.W.B. Bredenoord; F.W. van Gaalen; L. Nijhuis; P.J.T.M. van Puijenbroek; T. Tekelenburg; R. Wortelboer; G.H.P. Dirkx; F.C. Groenendijk; I.T.M. Jorritsma; B. de Knegt; Frans Sijtsma; W. Dijkman
Archive | 2010
M.J.S.M. Reijnen; A. van Hinsberg; M.L.P. van Esbroek; B. de Knegt; R. Pouwels; S. van Tol; J. Wiertz