A. Vivenzio

Cytokines profile in serum of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is changed by LDL-apheresis

OBJECTIVE The effects of LDL-apheresis (LDLa) with dextran sulphate on plasma cytokines in 6 homozygous familial hypercholesterolemic (HozFH) patients, were evaluated. METHODS Plasma IL-1α; IL-1ra; IL-4; IL-6; IL-10; IL-12(p40); IL-12(p70); TNF-α, sTNF-R, VEGF, VEGF-R1, E-Selectin (ESEL), and P-Selectin (PSEL) concentrations were measured before and after LDLa on three consecutive sessions for each patient. RESULTS TNF-α was significantly reduced (-60%; P=0.01), while TNF-R was only slightly increased (+15%), although not significantly. Plasma VEGF was significantly reduced (-57%; P=1.87301E-05), while VEGF-R1 was significantly increased (+56%; P=0.05). ESEL and PSEL were reduced but not to a statistically significant extent (-19%, -15%, respectively). IL-1α level was dramatically reduced (-87%; P=0.0001). IL-1ra concentration was only slightly increased in plasma, but not significantly. IL-4 and IL-10 levels were significantly reduced in plasma after apheresis (-50%; P=0.03, and -55%; P=0.004, respectively). On the contrary, IL-6 concentration showed a slight decrease (-8%). Plasma IL-12p40 was significantly increased (+47%; P=0.0004). On the other hand, IL-12p70 was reduced, but the difference (-31%) was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS Plasma cytokines imbalance is associated with inflammation and atherogenesis. In this study LDLa changed several circulating cytokines inducing anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic changes in cytokines plasma profile in HozFH patients with/without pre-existing angiographically demonstrated coronary heart disease (CHD) and aortic valvular disease (AVD).

Treatment of symptomatic hyperLp(a)lipidemia with LDL-apheresis vs. usual care

BACKGROUND/AIMS To assess LDL-apheresis efficacy to lower Lp(a) and to compare the effects of Usual Medical Care (UMC) a 12-months study was carried out. The incidence of new coronary artery disease (CAD) events/need of revascularization, was also monitored. METHODS Twenty-one patients with hyperLp(a)lipidemia and angiographically documented CAD were randomly assigned to LDL-apheresis every week, or the UMC. RESULTS LDL-apheresis group, averaged an Lp(a) reduction of 57.8+/-9.5% vs. basal values (P<0.001). In the UMC group Lp(a) increased in 1 year to 14.7+/-36.5% (P=0.66). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis for predictors of Lp(a) including: type of treatment, smoking, hypertension, age, age at first cardiovascular event, initial Lp(a), LDL, and BMI values, was performed. Only the type of treatment was co-related (P<0.001): Lp(a) variation (beta)=0.863. The model has R2 adjusted relative risk of 0.725. CONCLUSION LDL-apheresis could be the first line treatment of isolated hyperLp(a)lipidemia when CAD is established. New CAD events/cardiac interventions were not observed.

Aorta and coronary angiographic follow-up of children with severe hypercholesterolemia treated with low-density lipoprotein apheresis

BACKGROUND: In this single‐center, nonrandomized, prospective study, 11 children with severe genetic hypercholesterolemia, without previous cardiovascular disease events, were treated with low‐density lipoprotein apheresis (LDLa).

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis in a patient aged 3.5 years.

A 3.5 y‐old girl carrying a severe mutation of the LDL‐receptor gene known as “FH Pavia”, affected by homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and at high risk of developing coronary artery atherosclerosis was treated with selective dextran sulphate cellulose (DSC) column low‐density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL‐a). This is the youngest patient ever treated with LDL‐a. Plasma total cholesterol (982 mg/dl) and LDL‐cholesterol (939mg/dl) (T‐Chol, LDL‐Chol) levels at baseline showed a transient decrease: –13.4%, and –16.8%, respectively, after 9 mo of combined treatment with a diet, cholestyramine (max. 12g/d) and atorvastatin (max. 30mg/d). However, the drugs were discontinued because of intolerance and an increase in aminotransferases and creatine phosphokinase in the plasma. Moreover, after 9 mo of this therapy, the mean plasma T‐Chol and LDL‐Chol levels were still high (930 mg/dl and 869.5 mg/dl, respectively). Therefore, 9 consecutive treatments with LDL‐a were carried out every 15 d (plasma volumes treated: 1000–1700 ml). Mean plasma T‐Chol, LDL‐Chol, triglycerides (TG), and Lp(a) decreased significantly: –75.5%, –77.2%, –67.5% and −50.8%, respectively. HDL‐cholesterol (HDL‐Chol) concentration was considerably decreased immediately after apheresis because of haemodilution (X: −45.1%).

Immunoadsorption apheresis and immunosuppressive drug therapy in the treatment of complicated HCV‐related cryoglobulinemia

The immunosuppressive drug therapy (IDT) is not always effective to avoid the development of complications in hepatitis C virus‐related cryoglobulinemia (HCV‐Cr). Removal of cryoglobulins by therapeutic plasmapheresis is currently accepted. In this randomized, parallel group study, 17 male and female patients aged 43–79 years, with complicated HCV‐Cr, were submitted for 12 weeks (initial immunosuppressive therapy) to IDT (α‐interferon, pegylated‐interferon α‐2a, cyclophosphamide, methylprednisolone, prednisone, cyclosporine, ribavirin, and melphalan). Then, they were randomly assigned to two parallel groups: A # 9 patients treated by immunoadsorption apheresis (Selesorb®) (IA) plus IDT, and B # 8 patients submitted to IDT only, for further 12 weeks. # 187 IA aphereses were performed. No adverse reactions or complications were observed. A Clinical Score (CS) was adapted from a pre‐existing scoring model to evaluate signs and symptoms inherent to the underlying immunologic disorder. The CS was calculated at baseline (CS0), after the initial immunosuppressive therapy (CS1 = 12 weeks) when patients were treated only with IDT, and at the end of the study (24 weeks) in the group A (CSA; IA plus IDT) and B (CSB; IDT only). The score did not change significantly from CS0 to CS1. However, statistically significant differences were observed between CS1 and CSA (P < 0.001), and CSA versus CSB (P = 0.03), respectively. The changes observed were favorable to the patients assigned to the IA plus IDT group (A): in most case relief of symptoms and complications have been obtained. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2009.

Treatment of homozygous and double heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemic children with LDL-apheresis.

Within the framework of a seven-year clinical experience on treatment of severe hyperlipoproteinemia with/without associated coronary heart disease, with therapeutic plasmapheresis (APO B-100-containing lipoprotein-apheresis), we focused the present report on two young patients aged 7 and 11 years, respectively. The older patient is a boy treated since 1990 by plasma-exchange, cascade filtration-low density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-apheresis), and dextrane sulphate-LDL apheresis. Over the treatment period the patient was submitted to three consecutive coronary angiographies. The second patient is a girl first submitted to a coronary angiography and then treated with dextrane sulphate-LDL apheresis. Up to now, a total of one-hundred therapeutic plasmaphereses have been performed. The interval of treatment was of fifteen days, and a volume of 2-3000 ml of plasma was processed at each session. The systems used were the following: DIDECO Vivacell BT 798-A, DIDECO Vivacell BT 798-A + BT 803, DIDECO BT 985 (Dideco, Mirandola, Italy), KANEKA MA-01 (Kanegafuchi, Osaka, Japan). Mean (SD) plasma apo B-100-containing major lipoprotein-LDL, Lp(a) - levels during treatment, are reported below: LDL-Apheresis mg/dl   LDL-Chol   Lp(a) before   479 (83)   58 (15) after   103 (67)   21 (14) The treatment was very well tolerated. Rare, moderate hypotensive events occurred. Nevertheless, all procedures were regularly completed. A mild hypochromic anemia, regressed using drug treatment, was observed in the boy. Along with the improvement of plasma atherogenic profile, a regression of skin xanthomas and unchanged favourable coronary angiograms, were obtained in the above mentioned patient.

Effects of Low-Dose Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin on Plasma Lipid Profiles A Long-Term, Randomized, Open-Label Study in Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia

Background and objectiveDespite the favorable effects of reduction of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in decreasing the risk of coronary heart disease, many patients treated with lipid-lowering HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) do not achieve goal LDL-C levels. This may be due to high doses of statins prescribed that could potentially induce adverse effects and compromise patient safety and compliance with considerable expense in the long-term. We compared the actions of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, administered at the low dosages of 10 and 20 mg/day, respectively, in reducing plasma LDL-C levels and their effects on other components of the atherogenic lipid profile in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.MethodsIn this randomized, parallel group, open-label clinical study, 106 patients with LDL-C >200 mg/dL were treated with rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (group A; n = 52), or atorvastatin 20 mg/day (group B; n = 54) for 48 weeks.ResultsAt 48 weeks, rosuvastatin 10 mg/day was associated with a significantly greater reduction in plasma LDL-C levels compared with atorvastatin 20 mg/day (−44.32% vs −30%; p < 0.005). Compared with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin also produced a greater reduction in plasma total cholesterol, triglycerides, and non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels (p < 0.005). Plasma HDL-C levels were not affected significantly, independent of the drug used.ConclusionIn high-risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, rosuvastatin 10 mg/day was more efficacious than atorvastatin 20 mg/day in reducing plasma LDL-C levels, enabling goal LDL-C levels to be achieved and improving other lipid parameters. Both treatments were well tolerated over 48 weeks.

Treatment of symptomatic HyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia with LDL-apheresis: a multicentre study

LDL-apheresis (LDLa) efficacy in the treatment of symptomatic HyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia -HyperLp(a)- has been studied in a multicentre trial. After 3.1+/-2.7 years of weekly and biweekly treatment, the data from 19 patients (males:12; females:7; aged 53.8+/-9.3 years; mean body mass index: 24.6+/-2.3 Kg/m²) were evaluated. Data were collected using the same questionnaire shared by 5 participating centres. A total of 2331 procedures were performed. A mean of 3593.7+/-800.3 ml of plasma or 8115.3+/-2150.1 ml of blood, depending upon the technique used (H.E.L.P., D.A.LI., Dextransulphate, Lipocollect 200), was regularly treated on average every 10.1+/-2.6 days. Baseline mean Lp(a) levels were 172.3+/-153.8 mg/dL. The mean pre-/post-apheresis Lp(a) levels decreased from 124.5+/-107.2 mg/dL (p<0.001 vs baseline) to 34.2+/-40.6 mg/dL (p<0.001 vs pre-). Baseline mean LDL-cholesterol (LDLC) levels were 152.3+/-74.6 mg/dL. The mean pre-/post-apheresis LDLC levels decreased from 130.4+/-61.1 mg/dL (p<0.004 vs baseline) to 41.2+/-25.1 mg/dL (p<0.001 vs pre-). The hypolipidemic drugs given to the patients during LDLa were: ezetimibe+simvastatin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, acipimox, and omega-3 fatty acids. 58% of the patients had arterial hypertension. Cigarette smokers were 5.3%. Alcohol intake was present in 21%. 52.6% were physically active. Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) submitted to coronary catheterization before LDLa were 95%. In 5.5% (#1) CAD recurred despite treatment with LDLa. 79% were submitted to coronary revascularization before LDLa. CAD was: monovasal in 8 patients (42.1%), bivasal in 5 (26.4%), trivasal in 4 (21%), plurivasal in 2 (10.5%). In 94.5% of the sample the lesions were stable (< 0% deviation) over 3.1+/-2.7 years. 37% had both CAD and extra-coronary artery disease. This multicentre study confirmed that long-term treatment with LDLa was at least able to stabilize CAD in the majority of the individuals with symptomatic HyperLp(a).

Apheresis-inducible cytokine pattern change in severe, genetic dyslipidemias

OBJECTIVE The effects of direct adsorption of lipids LDL-apheresis (DALILDL-a) on plasma cytokines in two Homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemic (HozFH, HtzFH) and in four HyperLp(a)lipoproteinemic [HyperLp(a)] patients, were evaluated. METHODS Plasma, macrophage inflammatory proteins 1α (MIP-1α), macrophage inflammatory proteins 1β (MIP-1β), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), RANTES (Regulated upon Activation, Normal T-cell Expressed, and Secreted), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF), granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-1α (IL-1α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), concentrations, were measured before and after LDL-a on three consecutive sessions for each patient. RESULTS MIP-1α was significantly reduced (P=0.05), while MIP-1β was significantly increased (P=0.05). Plasma MCP-1 was reduced, although not significantly, while RANTES was significantly increased (P=0.05). GCSF and GM-CSF were both significantly reduced (GM-CSF: P=0.05, GCSF: P=0.05, respectively). IL-1α level was significantly reduced (P=0.001). IL-1β, IL-6, and IFN-γ levels were significantly reduced in plasma after apheresis (IL-1β: P=0.001, IL-6: T1 P=0.001; T2 P=0.05, respectively, IFN-γ: P=0.001). IL-2 level in plasma was significantly reduced at T0, and T2, (P=0.001). However, IL-2 level showed a statistically significant increase at T1 (P=0.001). A significant correlation between IL-1α and IFN-γ was found: r=0.882 (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this study LDL-a induced profound changes in several circulating cytokines and promoted anti-inflammatory and anti-atherogenic cytokine profile in plasma of patients with severe dyslipidemia, with pre-existing angiographically demonstrated Coronary heart disease (CHD), and aortic valvular disease (#=1) (AVD).

Cyclophosphamide and immunoadsorption apheresis treatment of lupus nephritis nonresponsive to drug therapy alone

In this report we present a 28-year-old male patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that was treated with immunoadsorption apheresis (IA) and cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis (proliferative glomerulonephritis, class IV-B) after proving nonresponsive to drug therapy alone. Before starting the therapeutic cycle with IA, the patient was administered prednisone 25 mg/d, hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice/d, ACE inhibitors 5 mg/d, aspirin 100 mg/d, furosemide 50 mg/d, and intravenous (IV) albumin (20%) 50mL. Deteriorating clinical conditions necessitated a renal biopsy, and thereafter an increase in medication. The patient was given a bolus of IV cyclophosphamide 1 g/d for 1 day and IV methylprednisone 500 mg/d for 3 days. This was not followed by any improvement and the renal functions worsened. Thus, 3 weeks after the more aggressive pharmacologic treatment with cyclophosphamide, which had been prescribed to improve renal function, and given the young age of the patient, the decision was made to administer LA (Selesorb®). IA selectively removes IgG and IgM immune complexes from the plasma, thereby reducing the complications induced by the pathogenic autoimmune reaction. The treatment was administrated twice a week for the first 15 days, once a week for a further 5 weeks, and biweekly in the last month with a bolus of cyclophosphamide (average 250-100mg) after each session. After twelve sessions of IA over 3 months, renal function was completely restored and the patient discharged. Although it is not proven, the concomitant use of cyclophosphamide could presumably improve the final clinical outcome.