Serafina Di Giacomo

Aorta and coronary angiographic follow-up of children with severe hypercholesterolemia treated with low-density lipoprotein apheresis

BACKGROUND: In this single‐center, nonrandomized, prospective study, 11 children with severe genetic hypercholesterolemia, without previous cardiovascular disease events, were treated with low‐density lipoprotein apheresis (LDLa).

A three month-old infant with severe hyperchylomicronemia: Molecular diagnosis and extracorporeal treatment

OBJECTIVE Chylomicronemia syndrome presenting in childhood is a rare recessive disorder due to mutations of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and more rarely of APOC2, APOA5, GPIHBP1 or LMF1 genes. It often requires urgent and suitable treatment to avoid acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was the molecular characterization and treatment of a 3 month-old infant with plasma triglycerides (TG) > 300 mmol/L. METHODS All candidate genes were sequenced. The patient was submitted to one plasma-exchange (PEX) procedure and subsequently to a rigid lipid-lowering diet (milk: Monogen(®)). RESULTS The proband was homozygous for a novel LPL mutation (c.242G > A, p.G81D) which in silico results pathogenic. After PEX, which was well tolerated, TG dropped to 64 mmol/L. During 5-month follow-up there was a clear trend towards lower and stable TG values. CONCLUSION PEX is applicable in subjects with very low body weight when the extreme severity of the clinical picture has no therapeutic alternatives.

Immunoadsorption apheresis and immunosuppressive drug therapy in the treatment of complicated HCV‐related cryoglobulinemia

The immunosuppressive drug therapy (IDT) is not always effective to avoid the development of complications in hepatitis C virus‐related cryoglobulinemia (HCV‐Cr). Removal of cryoglobulins by therapeutic plasmapheresis is currently accepted. In this randomized, parallel group study, 17 male and female patients aged 43–79 years, with complicated HCV‐Cr, were submitted for 12 weeks (initial immunosuppressive therapy) to IDT (α‐interferon, pegylated‐interferon α‐2a, cyclophosphamide, methylprednisolone, prednisone, cyclosporine, ribavirin, and melphalan). Then, they were randomly assigned to two parallel groups: A # 9 patients treated by immunoadsorption apheresis (Selesorb®) (IA) plus IDT, and B # 8 patients submitted to IDT only, for further 12 weeks. # 187 IA aphereses were performed. No adverse reactions or complications were observed. A Clinical Score (CS) was adapted from a pre‐existing scoring model to evaluate signs and symptoms inherent to the underlying immunologic disorder. The CS was calculated at baseline (CS0), after the initial immunosuppressive therapy (CS1 = 12 weeks) when patients were treated only with IDT, and at the end of the study (24 weeks) in the group A (CSA; IA plus IDT) and B (CSB; IDT only). The score did not change significantly from CS0 to CS1. However, statistically significant differences were observed between CS1 and CSA (P < 0.001), and CSA versus CSB (P = 0.03), respectively. The changes observed were favorable to the patients assigned to the IA plus IDT group (A): in most case relief of symptoms and complications have been obtained. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2009.

Effects of Low-Dose Atorvastatin and Rosuvastatin on Plasma Lipid Profiles A Long-Term, Randomized, Open-Label Study in Patients with Primary Hypercholesterolemia

Background and objectiveDespite the favorable effects of reduction of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in decreasing the risk of coronary heart disease, many patients treated with lipid-lowering HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) do not achieve goal LDL-C levels. This may be due to high doses of statins prescribed that could potentially induce adverse effects and compromise patient safety and compliance with considerable expense in the long-term. We compared the actions of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin, administered at the low dosages of 10 and 20 mg/day, respectively, in reducing plasma LDL-C levels and their effects on other components of the atherogenic lipid profile in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia.MethodsIn this randomized, parallel group, open-label clinical study, 106 patients with LDL-C >200 mg/dL were treated with rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (group A; n = 52), or atorvastatin 20 mg/day (group B; n = 54) for 48 weeks.ResultsAt 48 weeks, rosuvastatin 10 mg/day was associated with a significantly greater reduction in plasma LDL-C levels compared with atorvastatin 20 mg/day (−44.32% vs −30%; p < 0.005). Compared with atorvastatin, rosuvastatin also produced a greater reduction in plasma total cholesterol, triglycerides, and non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels (p < 0.005). Plasma HDL-C levels were not affected significantly, independent of the drug used.ConclusionIn high-risk patients with primary hypercholesterolemia, rosuvastatin 10 mg/day was more efficacious than atorvastatin 20 mg/day in reducing plasma LDL-C levels, enabling goal LDL-C levels to be achieved and improving other lipid parameters. Both treatments were well tolerated over 48 weeks.

Toward an international consensus—Integrating lipoprotein apheresis and new lipid-lowering drugs

BACKGROUND Despite advances in pharmacotherapy of lipid disorders, many dyslipidemic patients do not attain sufficient lipid lowering to mitigate risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Several classes of novel lipid-lowering agents are being evaluated to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is effective in acutely lowering the plasma concentrations of atherogenic lipoproteins including low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and lipoprotein(a), and novel lipid-lowering drugs may dampen the lipid rebound effect of LA, with the possibility that LA frequency may be decreased, in some cases even be discontinued. SOURCES OF MATERIAL This document builds on current American Society for Apheresis guidelines and, for the first time, makes recommendations from summarized data of the emerging lipid-lowering drug classes (inhibitors of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 or microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, high-density lipoprotein mimetic), including the available evidence on combination therapy with LA with respect to the management of patients with dyslipidemia. ABSTRACT OF FINDINGS Recommendations for different indications are given based on the latest evidence. However, except for lomitapide in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and alirocumab/evolocumab in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia subjects, limited data are available on the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy. More studies on combining LA with novel lipid-lowering drugs are needed. CONCLUSION Novel lipid-lowering agents have potential to improve the performance of LA, but more evidence is needed. The Multidisciplinary International Group for Hemapheresis TherapY and Metabolic DIsturbances Contrast scientific society aims to establish an international registry of clinical experience on LA combination therapy to expand the evidence on this treatment in individuals at high cardiovascular disease risk.

Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐Density Lipoprotein Apheresis Working Group 2009 Survey

We present results of the second survey of the Italian Multicenter Study on Low‐Density Lipoprotein Apheresis (IMSLDLa‐WG/2). The study involved 18 centers in 2009, treating 66 males and 35 females, mean age 47 ± 18 years. Mean age for initiation of drug treatment before low‐density lipoprotein apheresis (LDLa) was 31 ± 18 years, mean age to the first LDLa was 37 ± 20 years and average duration of treatment was 9 ± 6 years. The techniques used included direct adsorption of lipids, dextran sulfate cellulose adsorption, heparin‐mediated low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) precipitation, cascade filtration, and plasma exchange. The mean treated plasma/blood volumes/session were 3127 ± 518 mL and 8666 ± 1384 mL, respectively. The average plasma volume substituted was 3500 ± 300 mL. Lipid therapy before LDLa included ezetimibe, statins, ω‐3 fatty acids and fenofibrate. Baseline mean LDL cholesterol (LDLC) levels were 386 ± 223 mg/dL. The mean before/after apheresis LDLC level decreased by 67% from 250 ± 108 mg/dL (P = 0.05 vs. baseline) to 83 ± 37 mg/dL (P = 0.001 vs. before). Baseline mean Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level was 179 ± 136 mg/dL. Mean before/after apheresis Lp(a) level decreased by 71% from 133 ± 120 mg/dL (P = 0.05 vs. baseline) to 39 ± 44 mg/dL (P = 0.001 vs. before). Major and minor side effects occurred in 27 and 62 patients, respectively. Among patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), 62.3% had coronary angiography and 50.4% coronary revascularization before LDLa. Single vessel, double vessel and triple vessel CAD occurred in 19 (30.1%), 15 (23.8%) and 29 (46%) patients, respectively. Both CAD and extra‐CAD occurred in 41.5%, 39% had hypertension, 9.9% were smokers, 9.9% consumed alcohol and 42% were physically active. Ischemic cardiovascular events were not observed in any patient over 9 ± 6 years of treatment. Two centers have also treated 34 patients (females: 17/males 17; no. sessions: 36; average plasma volume treated: 3000 mL) for sudden hearing loss (SHL). Relief of symptoms was obtained, independently of the system used (HELP; cascade‐filtration).

LDL Apheresis: A Novel Technique (LIPOCOLLECT 200)

Therapeutic means to lower Lp(a) are limited. The most effective method to reduce plasma Lp(a) concentration significantly is therapeutic apheresis, namely, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) apheresis. A novel technique based on reusable LDL adsorber called Lipocollect 200 (Medicollect, Rimbach, Germany) allows the removal of both LDL and Lp(a) from plasma. Two male patients with hyperLp(a)lipoproteinemia and angiographically established progressive coronary heart disease, without rough elevation of LDL-cholesterol, who did not respond to diet and medication were submitted to 50 LDL Lp(a) aphereses with Lipocollect 200 LDL Lp(a)-adsorber at weekly and biweekly intervals. Total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol plasma levels fell significantly by 48.3% (+/-6.7) to 61.6% (+/-12.7) (first patient), and 42.5% (+/-6.3) to 60.6% (+/-14.3) (second patient), respectively (all differences: P < or = 0.001). High-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol concentration in plasma did not show statistically significant change. Plasma triglycerides were also significantly reduced by 43.6% (+/-24.4) (first patient) and 42.3% (+/-13) (second patient) (both differences: P < or = 0.001). Plasma Lp(a) showed a statistically significant percent reduction in plasma as expected: 64.7 +/- 9.5 (first patient), and 59.1 +/- 6.7 (second patient) (both differences: P < or = 0.001). Plasma fibrinogen concentration was decreased by 35.9% (+/-18.7) (P < or = 0.05) (first patient) and 41.8% (+/-11.5) (second patient) (P < or = 0.005). Considering the reduction rate between the first and the last procedures, we have compared the mean percent reduction of the first five treatments (from session #1 to #5) with the last five treatments (from session #21 to #25). We have observed an increasing reduction of all activity parameters on both patients apart from HDL-cholesterol (first patient) and triglyceride (second patient) that showed a decreasing reduction rate. Both patients followed the prescribed schedule and completed the study. Clinically, all sessions were well tolerated and undesired reactions were not reported. The Lipocollect 200 adsorber proved to have a good biocompatibility. In this study, the adsorber reusability for several sessions was confirmed.

Cyclophosphamide and immunoadsorption apheresis treatment of lupus nephritis nonresponsive to drug therapy alone

In this report we present a 28-year-old male patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that was treated with immunoadsorption apheresis (IA) and cyclophosphamide for lupus nephritis (proliferative glomerulonephritis, class IV-B) after proving nonresponsive to drug therapy alone. Before starting the therapeutic cycle with IA, the patient was administered prednisone 25 mg/d, hydroxychloroquine 200mg twice/d, ACE inhibitors 5 mg/d, aspirin 100 mg/d, furosemide 50 mg/d, and intravenous (IV) albumin (20%) 50mL. Deteriorating clinical conditions necessitated a renal biopsy, and thereafter an increase in medication. The patient was given a bolus of IV cyclophosphamide 1 g/d for 1 day and IV methylprednisone 500 mg/d for 3 days. This was not followed by any improvement and the renal functions worsened. Thus, 3 weeks after the more aggressive pharmacologic treatment with cyclophosphamide, which had been prescribed to improve renal function, and given the young age of the patient, the decision was made to administer LA (Selesorb®). IA selectively removes IgG and IgM immune complexes from the plasma, thereby reducing the complications induced by the pathogenic autoimmune reaction. The treatment was administrated twice a week for the first 15 days, once a week for a further 5 weeks, and biweekly in the last month with a bolus of cyclophosphamide (average 250-100mg) after each session. After twelve sessions of IA over 3 months, renal function was completely restored and the patient discharged. Although it is not proven, the concomitant use of cyclophosphamide could presumably improve the final clinical outcome.