A.Y. Ho
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by A.Y. Ho.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2009
A.Y. Ho; Ryan J. Burri; Jamie A. Cesaretti; Nelson N. Stone; Richard G. Stock
PURPOSEnTo evaluate the influence of patient- and treatment-related factors on freedom from biochemical failure (FFbF) in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnFrom a prospectively collected database of 2250 men treated at Mount Sinai Hospital from 1990 to 2004 with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer, 558 men with either one or more intermediate-risk features (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level 10-20 ng/mL, Gleason score 7, or Stage T2b) were identified who had a minimum follow-up of 24 months and postimplant CT-based dosimetric analysis. Biologically effective dose (BED) values were calculated to compare doses from different isotopes and treatment regimens. Patients were treated with brachytherapy with or without hormone therapy and/or external-beam radiotherapy. Patient- and treatment-related factors were analyzed with respect to FFbF. The median follow-up was 60 months (range, 24-167 months). Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix definition. Univariate analyses were used to determine whether any variable was predictive of FFbF. A two-sided p value of <0.05 was considered significant.nnnRESULTSnOverall, the actuarial FFbF at 10 years was 86%. Dose (BED <150 Gy(2) vs. >or=150 Gy(2)) was the only significant predictor of FFbF (p < 0.001). None of the other variables (PSA, external-beam radiotherapy, Gleason score, treatment type, hormones, stage, and number of risk factors) was found to be a statistically significant predictor of 10-year FFbF.nnnCONCLUSIONSnRadiation dose is an important predictor of FFbF in intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Treatment should continue to be individualized according to presenting disease characteristics until results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 0232 become available.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2010
Ryan J. Burri; A.Y. Ho; Kevin Forsythe; Jamie A. Cesaretti; Nelson N. Stone; Richard G. Stock
PURPOSEnTo evaluate retrospectively the biochemical outcomes of young men treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer.nnnMETHODS AND MATERIALSnFrom 1990 to 2005, 1,665 men with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with low-dose-rate brachytherapy +/- hormone therapy (HT) +/- external beam radiotherapy and underwent > or = 2 years of follow-up. Patients were stratified on the basis of age: < or = 60 (n = 378) and >60 years (n = 1,287). Biochemical failure was defined as a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir plus 2 ng/mL. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the association of variables with freedom from biochemical failure (FFbF).nnnRESULTSnMedian follow-up was 68 months (range, 24-180) for men < or = 60 years and 66 months (range, 24-200) for men >60. For the entire group, the actuarial 5- and 8-year FFbF rates were 94% and 88%, respectively. Men < or = 60 demonstrated similar 5- and 8-year FFbF (95% and 92%) compared with men >60 (93% and 87%; p = 0.071). A larger percent of young patients presented with low-risk disease; lower clinical stage, Gleason score (GS), and pretreatment PSA values; were treated after 1997; did not receive any HT; and had a high biologic effective dose (BED) of radiation (all ps <0.001). On multivariate analysis, PSA (p = 0.001), GS (p = 0.005), and BED (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with FFbF, but age was not (p = 0.665).nnnCONCLUSIONnYoung men achieve excellent 5- and 8-year biochemical control rates that are comparable to those of older men after prostate brachytherapy. Young age should not be a deterrent when considering brachytherapy as a primary treatment option for clinically localized prostate cancer.
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2015
Reshma Jagsi; Kent A. Griffith; Jennifer R. Bellon; Wendy A. Woodward; Janet K. Horton; A.Y. Ho; Anne F. Schott; Lori J. Pierce
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2008
Shari Damast; A.Y. Ho; Leslie L. Montgomery; Monica Fornier; Kathryn Beal; Eric P. Elkin; Nicole Ishill; B. McCormick
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2007
A.Y. Ho; G. Fan; J.A. Cesaretti; Nelson N. Stone; R.G. Stock
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011
M. Laufer; T.Y. Tam; A. McLane; A.Y. Ho; Abraham J. Wu; Valerie W. Rusch; Kenneth E. Rosenzweig; Andreas Rimner
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011
Sarah A. Milgrom; Hiram S. Cody; Lee Tan; Monica Morrow; Jeremy Setton; Jeffrey Catalano; B. McCormick; Simon N. Powell; A.Y. Ho
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011
T.Y. Tam; Kenneth E. Rosenzweig; Andreas Rimner; Anne Eaton; Z. Zhang; R.W. Mutter; M. Chawla; D.J. Finley; J.P. Sullivan; A.Y. Ho
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011
Jeremy Setton; Hiram S. Cody; Lee Tan; Monica Morrow; Jeffrey Catalano; B. McCormick; Simon N. Powell; A.Y. Ho
International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics | 2011
Jennifer Keam; Peter G. Cordeiro; Jeremy Setton; Kathryn Beal; Weiji Shi; Z. Zhang; B. McCormick; Simon N. Powell; A.Y. Ho