Aaron Weitzman
Exelixis
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Aaron Weitzman.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2013
David C. Smith; Matthew R. Smith; Christopher Sweeney; Aymen Elfiky; Christopher J. Logothetis; Paul G. Corn; Nicholas J. Vogelzang; Eric J. Small; Andrea L. Harzstark; Michael S. Gordon; Ulka N. Vaishampayan; Naomi B. Haas; Alexander I. Spira; Primo N. Lara; Chia Chi Lin; Sandy Srinivas; Avishay Sella; Patrick Schöffski; Christian Scheffold; Aaron Weitzman; Maha Hussain
PURPOSE Cabozantinib (XL184) is an orally bioavailable tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2. We evaluated the activity of cabozantinib in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in a phase II randomized discontinuation trial with an expansion cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients received 100 mg of cabozantinib daily. Those with stable disease per RECIST at 12 weeks were randomly assigned to cabozantinib or placebo. Primary end points were objective response rate at 12 weeks and progression-free survival (PFS) after random assignment. RESULTS One hundred seventy-one men with CRPC were enrolled. Random assignment was halted early based on the observed activity of cabozantinib. Seventy-two percent of patients had regression in soft tissue lesions, whereas 68% of evaluable patients had improvement on bone scan, including complete resolution in 12%. The objective response rate at 12 weeks was 5%, with stable disease in 75% of patients. Thirty-one patients with stable disease at week 12 were randomly assigned. Median PFS was 23.9 weeks (95% CI, 10.7 to 62.4 weeks) with cabozantinib and 5.9 weeks (95% CI, 5.4 to 6.6 weeks) with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.12; P < .001). Serum total alkaline phosphatase and plasma cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen were reduced by ≥ 50% in 57% of evaluable patients. On retrospective review, bone pain improved in 67% of evaluable patients, with a decrease in narcotic use in 56%. The most common grade 3 adverse events were fatigue (16%), hypertension (12%), and hand-foot syndrome (8%). CONCLUSION Cabozantinib has clinical activity in men with CRPC, including reduction of soft tissue lesions, improvement in PFS, resolution of bone scans, and reductions in bone turnover markers, pain, and narcotic use.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016
Matthew R. Smith; Johann S. de Bono; Cora N. Sternberg; Sylvestre Le Moulec; S. Oudard; Ugo De Giorgi; Michael Krainer; Andries M. Bergman; Wolfgang Hoelzer; Ronald de Wit; Martin Bögemann; Fred Saad; Giorgio Cruciani; Antoine Thiery-Vuillemin; Susan Feyerabend; Kurt Miller; Nadine Houédé; Syed A. Hussain; Elaine Lam; Jonathan Polikoff; A. Stenzl; Paul N. Mainwaring; David Ramies; Colin Hessel; Aaron Weitzman; Karim Fizazi
PURPOSE Cabozantinib is an inhibitor of kinases, including MET and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and has shown activity in men with previously treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This blinded phase III trial compared cabozantinib with prednisone in patients with mCRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with progressive mCRPC after docetaxel and abiraterone and/or enzalutamide were randomly assigned at a two-to-one ratio to cabozantinib 60 mg once per day or prednisone 5 mg twice per day. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Bone scan response (BSR) at week 12 as assessed by independent review committee was the secondary end point; radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and effects on circulating tumor cells (CTCs), bone biomarkers, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) were exploratory assessments. RESULTS A total of 1,028 patients were randomly assigned to cabozantinib (n = 682) or prednisone (n = 346). Median OS was 11.0 months with cabozantinib and 9.8 months with prednisone (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.06; stratified log-rank P = .213). BSR at week 12 favored cabozantinib (42% v 3%; stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P < .001). rPFS was improved in the cabozantinib group (median, 5.6 v 2.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.57; stratified log-rank P < .001). Cabozantinib was associated with improvements in CTC conversion, bone biomarkers, and post-random assignment incidence of SSEs but not PSA outcomes. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events and discontinuations because of adverse events were higher with cabozantinib than with prednisone (71% v 56% and 33% v 12%, respectively). CONCLUSION Cabozantinib did not significantly improve OS compared with prednisone in heavily treated patients with mCRPC and progressive disease after docetaxel and abiraterone and/or enzalutamide. Cabozantinib had some activity in improving BSR, rPFS, SSEs, CTC conversions, and bone biomarkers but not PSA outcomes.
Journal of Thoracic Oncology | 2008
Thomas J. Lynch; George R. Blumenschein; Jeffrey A. Engelman; Igor Espinoza-Delgado; Ramaswamy Govindan; Jeff Hanke; Nasser H. Hanna; John V. Heymach; Fred R. Hirsch; Pasi A. Jänne; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Ronald B. Natale; Gregory J. Riely; Lecia V. Sequist; Geoffrey I. Shapiro; Alice T. Shaw; Frances A. Shepherd; Mark A. Socinski; A. Gregory Sorensen; Heather A. Wakelee; Aaron Weitzman
The promise of effective targeted therapy for lung cancer requires rigorous identification of potential targets combined with intensive discovery and development efforts aimed at developing effective “drugs” for these targets. We now recognize that getting the right drug to the right target in the right patient is more complicated than one could have imagined a decade ago. As knowledge of targets and development of agents have proliferated and advanced, so too have data demonstrating the biologic heterogeneity of tumors. The finding that lung cancers are genetically diverse and can exhibit several pathways of resistance in response to targeted agents makes the prospect for curative therapy more daunting. It is becoming increasingly clear that single-agent treatment will be the exception rather than the rule. This information raises important new questions about the development and assessment of novel agents in lung cancer treatment: (1) How do we identify the most important drug targets for tumor initiation and maintenance? (2) What is the best way to assess drug candidates that may only be relevant in a small fraction of patients? (3) What models do we use to predict clinical response and identify effective combinations? And (4) how do we bring combination regimens to the clinic, particularly when the agents are not yet approved individually and may be under development from different companies? The Fifth Cambridge Conference on Novel Agents in the Treatment of Lung Cancer was held in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on October 1–2, 2007, to discuss these questions by reviewing recent progress in the field and advancing recommendations for research and patient care. New information, conclusions, and recommendations considered significant for the field by the program faculty are summarized here and presented at greater length in the individual articles and accompanying discussions that comprise the full conference proceedings. A CME activity based on this summary is also available at www.informedicalcme.com/cme.
British Journal of Cancer | 2017
Adil Daud; Harriet M. Kluger; Razelle Kurzrock; Frauke Schimmoller; Aaron Weitzman; Thomas A. Samuel; Ali H. Moussa; Michael S. Gordon; Geoffrey I. Shapiro
Background:A phase II randomised discontinuation trial assessed cabozantinib (XL184), an orally bioavailable inhibitor of tyrosine kinases including VEGF receptors, MET, and AXL, in a cohort of patients with metastatic melanoma.Methods:Patients received cabozantinib 100 mg daily during a 12-week lead-in. Patients with stable disease (SD) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) at week 12 were randomised to cabozantinib or placebo. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) at week 12 and postrandomisation progression-free survival (PFS).Results:Seventy-seven patients were enroled (62% cutaneous, 30% uveal, and 8% mucosal). At week 12, the ORR was 5%; 39% of patients had SD. During the lead-in phase, reduction in target lesions from baseline was seen in 55% of evaluable patients overall and in 59% of evaluable patients with uveal melanoma. Median PFS after randomisation was 4.1 months with cabozantinib and 2.8 months with placebo (hazard ratio of 0.59; P=0.284). Median PFS from study day 1 was 3.8 months, 6-month PFS was 33%, and median overall survival was 9.4 months. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were fatigue (14%), hypertension (10%), and abdominal pain (8%). One treatment-related death was reported from peritonitis due to diverticular perforation.Conclusions:Cabozantinib has clinical activity in patients with metastatic melanoma, including uveal melanoma. Further clinical investigation is warranted.
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Matthew R. Smith; Johann S. de Bono; Cora N. Sternberg; Sylvestre Le Moulec; Stéphane Oudard; Ugo De Giorgi; Michael Krainer; Andre M. Bergman; Wolfgang Hoelzer; Ronald de Wit; Martin Boegemann; Fred Saad; Giorgio Cruciani; Antoine Thiery Vuillemin; Susan Feyerabend; Kurt Miller; David A. Ramies; Colin Hessel; Aaron Weitzman; Karim Fizazi
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2005
Gary K. Schwartz; Aaron Weitzman; Eileen Mary O'Reilly; Les Brail; Dinesh P. de Alwis; Ann Cleverly; Barbara Barile-Thiem; Vincent Vinciguerra; Daniel R. Budman
Investigational New Drugs | 2007
Tara Baetz; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Lillian L. Siu; Martha MacLean; Karen Doppler; Wendy Walsh; Bryn Fisher; Azhar Z. Khan; Dinesh P. de Alwis; Aaron Weitzman; Leslie H. Brail; Malcolm A. Moore
European Urology | 2015
Ethan Basch; Karen A. Autio; Matthew R. Smith; Antonia V. Bennett; Aaron Weitzman; Christian Scheffold; Christopher Sweeney; Dana E. Rathkopf; David C. Smith; Daniel J. George; Celestia S. Higano; Andrea L. Harzstark; A. Oliver Sartor; Michael S. Gordon; Nicholas J. Vogelzang; Johann S. de Bono; Naomi B. Haas; Paul G. Corn; Frauke Schimmoller; Howard I. Scher
Archive | 2010
Dana T. Aftab; Thomas Mueller; Aaron Weitzman; Jaymes Holland
Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2015
Ethan Basch; Mark C. Scholz; Johann S. de Bono; Nicholas J. Vogelzang; Paul de Souza; Gavin M. Marx; Ulka N. Vaishampayan; Saby George; James K. Schwarz; Emmanuel S. Antonarakis; Joe M. O'Sullivan; Arash Rezazadeh Kalebasty; Kim N. Chi; Robert Dreicer; Thomas E. Hutson; Milan Mangeshkar; Jaymes Holland; Aaron Weitzman; Howard I. Scher