Abhijeet Basoor

Decreased Readmissions and Improved Quality of Care With the Use of an Inexpensive Checklist in Heart Failure

Providing effective discharge instructions, appropriate dose uptitration, education regarding heart failure (HF) monitoring, and strict follow-up have all been shown to decrease readmissions for HF but are all underutilized. The authors developed and evaluated the impact of a quality-improvement HF checklist as a tool to remind physicians to improve quality of care in HF patients. The checklist was used in randomly selected patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated HF. It included documentation regarding medications and dose uptitration, relevant counseling, and follow-up instructions at discharge. The checklist was used in 48 patients, and this checklist group was compared with 48 patients as a randomly selected control group. Higher proportions of patients were taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in the checklist group compared with the control group (40 of 48 vs 23 of 48, P<.001). Compared with the controls, the rate of dose uptitration for β-blockers and/or ACE inhibitors/ARBs was more common in the checklist group (4 of 48 vs 21 of 48, P<.001). Both 30-day (19% to 6%) and 6-month (42% to 23%) readmissions were lower in the checklist group. The use of an HF checklist was associated with better quality of care and decreased readmission rates for patients admitted with HF.

DECREASED READMISSIONS AND IMPROVED QUALITY OF CARE WITH USE OF INEXPENSIVE CHECKLIST IN HEART FAILURE

There is a growing concern regarding the potential non-reimbursement for 30-day readmissions for heart failure (HF). Providing effective discharge instructions, education regarding HF monitoring appropriate dose up titration and strict follow up have all shown to decrease readmissions but are all

Periprocedural and long-term outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in cardiology practice.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has recently been made a class I indication in the treatment of AAA. In comparison to the conventional open surgical treatment, endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with equivalent long‐term morbidity and mortality rates. Vascular surgeons perform majority of EVAR. There are no reports for the long‐term results of this intervention performed by interventional cardiologists. We present one of the first reports of periprocedural and long‐term outcomes of EVAR performed by interventional cardiologists.

No Racial Disparities in the Treatment of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction – A Community-based Experience

Whether racial disparities exist in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not exactly known. We report a retrospective chart review of patients with first event of STEMI, in two groups separated by one decade. Results revealed that hospital mortality in the 2007 and 1997 groups for African Americans versus Caucasians was one of 22 versus 21 of 170, 95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.178 to 0.022, p=0.48 and four of 41 versus 39 of 402, 95 % CI -0.095 to 0.096, p=1.00, respectively. The mean length of stay (LOS) for African Americans and Caucasians in the 2007 and 1997 groups was 5.7 versus 4.1 days (p=0.09) and 7.3 versus 6.6 days (p=0.42), respectively. During follow-up, a total of 40 patients needed re-intervention in the 2007 group. The re-intervention rate in African American patients being 13.6 % (three of 22) versus 21.2 % (36 of 170) in Caucasians, 95 % CI -0.231 to 0.081, with p=0.57. In conclusion, there was no evidence of racial disparity in the treatment of STEMI in terms of hospital mortality, length of hospital stay and re-intervention rate.