Nishit Choksi

Safety and feasibility of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions: the ORBIT I trial.

Objective: The ORBIT I trial evaluated the safety and performance of an orbital atherectomy system (OAS) for the treatment of de novo calcified coronary lesions. Background: Severely calcified coronary arteries pose an ongoing treatment challenge. Stent placement in calcified lesions can result in stent under expansion, malapposition, and procedural complications. OAS treatment may change calcified lesion compliance to reduce procedural complications and facilitate stent placement. Methods: The ORBIT I trial, a prospective, nonrandomized study, was conducted in two centers in India. Fifty patients with de novo calcified coronary lesions were enrolled. Patients were treated with the OAS followed by stent placement. Results: The average age of the patients was 57.4 years and 90% were male. Mean lesion length was 13.4 mm. The average number of OAS devices used per patient was 1.3. Device success was 98%, and procedural success was 94%. The cumulative major adverse cardiac event rate was 4% in‐hospital (two non–Q‐wave myocardial infarctions), 6% at 30 days (one additional non–Q‐wave myocardial infarction leading to target lesion revascularization), and 8% at 6 months (one additional event of cardiac death). Angiographic complications were observed in seven patients (six dissections and one perforation). Conclusion: The ORBIT I trial suggests that the OAS may offer an effective method to change compliance of calcified coronary lesions to facilitate optimal stent placement in these difficult to treat patients. A larger trial is required to establish safety and overall effectiveness of the OAS in treating calcified coronary lesions.

Decreased Readmissions and Improved Quality of Care With the Use of an Inexpensive Checklist in Heart Failure

Providing effective discharge instructions, appropriate dose uptitration, education regarding heart failure (HF) monitoring, and strict follow-up have all been shown to decrease readmissions for HF but are all underutilized. The authors developed and evaluated the impact of a quality-improvement HF checklist as a tool to remind physicians to improve quality of care in HF patients. The checklist was used in randomly selected patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated HF. It included documentation regarding medications and dose uptitration, relevant counseling, and follow-up instructions at discharge. The checklist was used in 48 patients, and this checklist group was compared with 48 patients as a randomly selected control group. Higher proportions of patients were taking angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in the checklist group compared with the control group (40 of 48 vs 23 of 48, P<.001). Compared with the controls, the rate of dose uptitration for β-blockers and/or ACE inhibitors/ARBs was more common in the checklist group (4 of 48 vs 21 of 48, P<.001). Both 30-day (19% to 6%) and 6-month (42% to 23%) readmissions were lower in the checklist group. The use of an HF checklist was associated with better quality of care and decreased readmission rates for patients admitted with HF.

12-month primary patency rates of contemporary endovascular device therapy for femoro-popliteal occlusive disease in 6,024 patients: beyond balloon angioplasty.

Endovascular approach to superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease, the most common cause of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, remains fraught with high failure rates. Newer devices including second‐generation nitinol stents, drug‐coated stents, drug‐coated balloons, covered stents, cryo‐therapy, LASER, and directional atherectomy have shown promising results. Clinical equipoise still persists regarding the optimal selection of devices, largely attributable to the different inclusion criteria, study population, length of lesions treated, definition of “patency” and “restenosis,” and follow‐up methods in the pivotal trials.

Carotid Stenting in High-Risk Patients: Early and Late Outcomes

PURPOSE Some patients with severe carotid stenosis have anatomical or clinical comorbidities that place them at high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The early and late outcomes after carotid artery stenting (CAS) were evaluated in patients at high risk for CEA. METHODS Between 2002 and 2009, 186 patients were enrolled in a high-risk CAS institutional registry. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac and cerberovascular events (MACCEs) at 30 days, including death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes were technical, procedural, and clinical success; nonstroke neurological events; and death and ipsilateral stroke at 5 years. RESULTS Twenty-five patients (13.2%) were symptomatic. Thirty day MACCE occurred in 2.6%, including death in 1 (0.5%), stroke in 3 (1.6%), and myocardial infraction in 1 (0.5%) patient. Strokes were nonfatal in 3 (1.6%), major in 2 (1.1%), and minor in 1 (0.5%) patients. Other neurological events included transient ischemic attack in 9 (4.7%) and retinal artery occlusion in 2 (1.1%) patients. After stroke, 2 patients had complete resolution of neurological deficit within 30 days, and 1 patient had improvement in neurological deficit. By Kaplan--Meier analysis, all-cause mortality was 47.5% and ipsilateral stroke was 4.5% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS In patients who are high risk for CEA, CAS can be performed with low MACCE at 30 days and ipsilateral stroke at 5 years. However, nearly half of these patients die within 5 years from causes unrelated to stroke.

DECREASED READMISSIONS AND IMPROVED QUALITY OF CARE WITH USE OF INEXPENSIVE CHECKLIST IN HEART FAILURE

There is a growing concern regarding the potential non-reimbursement for 30-day readmissions for heart failure (HF). Providing effective discharge instructions, education regarding HF monitoring appropriate dose up titration and strict follow up have all shown to decrease readmissions but are all

Periprocedural and long-term outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in cardiology practice.

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has recently been made a class I indication in the treatment of AAA. In comparison to the conventional open surgical treatment, endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with equivalent long‐term morbidity and mortality rates. Vascular surgeons perform majority of EVAR. There are no reports for the long‐term results of this intervention performed by interventional cardiologists. We present one of the first reports of periprocedural and long‐term outcomes of EVAR performed by interventional cardiologists.

No Racial Disparities in the Treatment of ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction – A Community-based Experience

Whether racial disparities exist in the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not exactly known. We report a retrospective chart review of patients with first event of STEMI, in two groups separated by one decade. Results revealed that hospital mortality in the 2007 and 1997 groups for African Americans versus Caucasians was one of 22 versus 21 of 170, 95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.178 to 0.022, p=0.48 and four of 41 versus 39 of 402, 95 % CI -0.095 to 0.096, p=1.00, respectively. The mean length of stay (LOS) for African Americans and Caucasians in the 2007 and 1997 groups was 5.7 versus 4.1 days (p=0.09) and 7.3 versus 6.6 days (p=0.42), respectively. During follow-up, a total of 40 patients needed re-intervention in the 2007 group. The re-intervention rate in African American patients being 13.6 % (three of 22) versus 21.2 % (36 of 170) in Caucasians, 95 % CI -0.231 to 0.081, with p=0.57. In conclusion, there was no evidence of racial disparity in the treatment of STEMI in terms of hospital mortality, length of hospital stay and re-intervention rate.