Abraham G. Kocheril

Intravenous Vasodilator Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure

The prevalence of congestive heart failure (CHF) is increasing in the US and worldwide, partly because patients are living longer. Treatment of CHF is mostly on an outpatient basis, but inpatient care is required for decompensated CHF, acute CHF or poor response to outpatient treatment. Control of symptoms is usually achieved by diuresis.Intravenous (IV) vasodilators are an important adjunct to the inpatient treatment of CHF. They work mainly by reducing the afterload on the myocardium although preload reduction also occurs. After clinical stabilisation, the goal is to switch to a maintenance oral regimen to be continued as outpatient therapy. The range of IV vasodilators available for inpatient treatment of CHF includes nitrates, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, dobutamine, morphine, ACE inhibitors, B-type natriuretic peptides and endothelin receptor antagonists. As each agent may have a different mechanism or site of action, each agent may affect preload, contractility or afterload to a different extent and it may be desirable to choose one over the other in a particular clinical setting.Examples of standard therapy include dobutamine, milrinone and nitroglycerin. Nesiritide, a B-type natriuretic peptide, is a newer vasodilator and US FDA approved for use in acute CHF. However, most studies with this agent have been in small numbers of patients with anecdotal findings. Larger studies are warranted to pinpoint the efficacy and adverse effects of this agent. It is primarily used to reduce the acuity of decompensated CHF on admission to hospital.Endothelin receptor antagonists show promise in the management of acute CHF, but continue to be investigational. Long-term data on their efficacy and safety are limited. None of the endothelin receptor antagonists are FDA approved for use in patients with CHF.

Atrial Fibrillation and Acid Reflux Disease

To date, the precise mechanism of atrial fibrillation (AF) as a possible cause of reflux disease remains uncertain, although some possibilities can be postulated. Inflammation and vagal stimulation may have a key role linking these 2 common diseases. There is some evidence in the form of case reports and limited observational studies reporting that reflux disease, and more specifically esophagitis, can cause paroxysmal AF, and various mechanisms have been proposed. Some studies have demonstrated that acid suppressive therapy by proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may help ameliorate symptoms associated with AF and also facilitate conversion to normal sinus rhythm in a subset of patients. Further prospective studies are needed to determine if a true causal mechanism exists between the two and assess whether the mechanism is dependent on a specific subtype of AF. In addition, the response of AF‐related symptoms to PPI therapy and the potential for PPI therapy to reduce the development of AF merits further investigation. Clin. Cardiol. 2011 DOI: 10.1002/clc.21969

Atrial fibrosis: a risk stratifier for atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), especially persistent and long-standing persistent AF, may result in electroanatomical changes in the left atrium, resulting in remodeling and deposition of fibrous tissue. There are emerging data that atrial substrate modification may increase the risk of thromboembolic complications, including stroke. Several studies have reported that atrial fibrosis is due to complex interactions among several cellular and neurohumoral mediators. Late gadolinium enhancement MRI has been reported to allow quantitative assessment of myocardial fibrosis in patients at risk of developing a stroke. Current stroke risk stratification criteria for AF do not utilize atrial fibrosis as an independent risk factor despite its association with AF and stroke. Further research is required in developing adequate risk stratification tools for predicting the stroke risk and catheter ablation outcomes in AF.

Commonly Consumed Beverages in Daily Life: Do They Cause Atrial Fibrillation?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia in the United States and worldwide. Caffeine, alcohol, and, more recently, energy drinks are the most commonly consumed beverages in daily living, especially by young individuals. Several questions have been raised about the implications of caffeine, alcohol, and energy drinks in cardiovascular health, especially in triggering AF. This review focuses on the role of these commonly consumed beverages as a cause of AF, with special emphasis of potential mechanisms and studies addressing this issue.

Survivors of sudden cardiac death with history of depression are not at significantly greater risk of recurrent arrhythmias and death.

greater risk of recurrent arrhythmias and death Mohit K. Turagam ⁎, Poonam Velagapudi , Aniko Szabo , Alexis Visotcky , Abraham G. Kocheril c a Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 3116 MFCB, 1685 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI-53705, USA b Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI-53226, USA c Division of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine Urbana Champaign, 611 W Park St, Urbana, IL-61822, USA

Aspirin in stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and stable vascular disease: an era of new anticoagulants

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, especially in the elderly. There are currently enough data to support the notion that anticoagulation with warfarin or dabigatran is far superior to aspirin in the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism in AF. Aspirin is the preferred modality in patients who are either not candidates for anticoagulation, such as patients with increased risk for bleeding, low-risk patients based on the CHADS2 score or patients who have difficulty in maintaining a therapeutic international normalized ratio. There is no dispute on the recommendations regarding stroke prevention in high-risk patients (CHADS2 risk score of 2 and beyond) with AF. However, there is some controversy regarding the appropriate strategy (anticoagulation vs aspirin) for stroke prevention in low-risk patients (CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0–1). Novel oral anticoagulant drugs (direct thrombin inhibitors and Factor Xa inhibitors) might further diminish the role of aspirin for stroke prevention in AF due to their superior efficacy, lack of need for monitoring of therapeutic effects and lower bleeding risk when compared with warfarin, especially in patients with stable vascular disease.

Antithrombotics in atrial fibrillation and coronary disease.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia and approximately 18–45% of AF patients have concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). Several studies have demonstrated that oral anticoagulation is the mainstay of therapy for stroke prevention in AF. Similarly, antiplatelet therapy including aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor is recommended in the management of acute coronary syndrome and stable CAD. Despite the high prevalence of CAD with AF, practice guidelines are scarce on the appropriate antithrombotic regimen due to lack of large-scale randomized clinical trials. The use of direct thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors for stroke prevention in AF has also complicated the possible combinations of antithrombotic therapies. This review aims to discuss the available evidence regarding aspirin as an antithrombotic strategy, the role of novel anticoagulants and the specific clinical situations where aspirin may be beneficial in patients with AF and CAD.