Abraham Verghese

Culture Shock — Patient as Icon, Icon as Patient

Dr. Abraham Verghese discusses the problem with a “chart as surrogate for the patient” approach. He believes that if one eschews the skilled and repeated examination of the real patient, then tests, consultations, and procedures that might not be needed are ordered, while simple diagnoses and new developments are overlooked.

Central venous septic thrombophlebitis--the role of medical therapy.

Suppurative thrombosis of a central vein is a serious complication of central venous catheter use. Surgical removal of the vein, the treatment usually recommended for peripheral vein suppuration, is technically difficult. We describe six patients with central venous septic thrombophlebitis. Four patients were receiving TPN; three from this group were successfully treated medically with removal of the catheter, intravenous antibiotics, and anticoagulants. The fourth patient improved clinically with 2 weeks of medical therapy prior to surgery, which showed the clot to be sterile. In contrast, two patients with suppuration adjacent to and secondarily involving a large vein required surgical drainage of the perivenous collection. Patients with central venous septic thrombophlebitis can be successfully managed with prompt catheter removal, intravenous antibiotics, and anticoagulation, but surgery should be considered when there is a suppurative focus around the vein.

The Bedside Evaluation: Ritual and Reason

The bedside evaluation, consisting of the history and physical examination, was once the primary means of diagnosis and clinical monitoring. The recent explosion of imaging and laboratory testing has inverted the diagnostic paradigm. Physicians often bypass the bedside evaluation for immediate testing and therefore encounter an image of the patient before seeing the patient in the flesh. In addition to risking delayed or missed diagnosis of readily recognizable disease, physicians who forgo or circumvent the bedside evaluation risk the loss of an important ritual that can enhance the physician-patient relationship. Patients expect that some form of bedside evaluation will take place when they visit a physician. When physicians complete this evaluation in an expert manner, it can have a salutary effect. If done poorly or not at all, in contrast, it can undermine the physician-patient relationship. Studies suggest that the context, locale, and quality of the bedside evaluation are associated with neurobiological changes in the patient. Recognizing the importance of the bedside evaluation as a healing ritual and a powerful diagnostic tool when paired with judicious use of technology could be a stimulus for the recovery of an ebbing skill set among physicians.

In praise of the physical examination

It provides reason and ritual

Pulmonary strongyloidiasis. Diagnosis by Sputum Gram stain

Sputum Gram stain was diagnostic for pulmonary strongyloidiasis in four patients from Tennessee with chronic obstructive lung disease treated with steroids. The case reports of these patients and photomicrographs of the larval forms by Gram stain are presented. Sputum Gram stain may be a useful procedure to screen for pulmonary strongyloidiasis in steroid-treated patients with chronic lung disease who come from an endemic area.

Enterococcal pneumonia: Occurrence in patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens and enteral feeding

Enterococcal pneumonia occurred as a superinfection in two patients who received broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Both patients were receiving enteral hyperalimentation by Dobb-Hoff tube. The organism was isolated from transtracheal aspirate in pure culture and gram-positive cocci were visible on gram-stained smear. Enterococcal pneumonia may occur in patients receiving cephalosporin-aminoglycoside therapy, and may be anticipated as a consequence of third-generation cephalosporin therapy.

Inadequacies of Physical Examination as a Cause of Medical Errors and Adverse Events: A Collection of Vignettes

BACKGROUND Oversights in the physical examination are a type of medical error not easily studied by chart review. They may be a major contributor to missed or delayed diagnosis, unnecessary exposure to contrast and radiation, incorrect treatment, and other adverse consequences. Our purpose was to collect vignettes of physical examination oversights and to capture the diversity of their characteristics and consequences. METHODS A cross-sectional study using an 11-question qualitative survey for physicians was distributed electronically, with data collected from February to June of 2011. The participants were all physicians responding to e-mail or social media invitations to complete the survey. There were no limitations on geography, specialty, or practice setting. RESULTS Of the 208 reported vignettes that met inclusion criteria, the oversight was caused by a failure to perform the physical examination in 63%; 14% reported that the correct physical examination sign was elicited but misinterpreted, whereas 11% reported that the relevant sign was missed or not sought. Consequence of the physical examination inadequacy included missed or delayed diagnosis in 76% of cases, incorrect diagnosis in 27%, unnecessary treatment in 18%, no or delayed treatment in 42%, unnecessary diagnostic cost in 25%, unnecessary exposure to radiation or contrast in 17%, and complications caused by treatments in 4%. The mode of the number of physicians missing the finding was 2, but many oversights were missed by many physicians. Most oversights took up to 5 days to identify, but 66 took longer. Special attention and skill in examining the skin and its appendages, as well as the abdomen, groin, and genitourinary area could reduce the reported oversights by half. CONCLUSIONS Physical examination inadequacies are a preventable source of medical error, and adverse events are caused mostly by failure to perform the relevant examination.

Adrenal Insufficiency in HIV Infection: A Review and Recommendations

Adrenal insufficiency is known to be a complication of HIV infection, although estimates of its prevalence and severity vary. Adrenal insufficiency is the most serious endocrine complication that occurs in persons with HIV infection. Patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) are considered to be at high risk for primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency. We describe 3 patients with AIDS who had clinical features suggestive of adrenal insufficiency, but their corticotropin (ACTH) stimulation tests were normal. Repeat testing confirmed the diagnosis in one patient, and further testing with the overnight metyrapone test revealed evidence of secondary adrenal insufficiency in the other patients. Persistent clinical improvement was evident on subsequent glucocorticoid therapy. A normal response to the ACTH stimulation test can be dangerously misleading. Patients with AIDS and suspected adrenal insufficiency who have normal screening by the ACTH stimulation test should undergo further testing for secondary adrenal disease.

Randomized comparative study of cefixime versus cephalexin in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.

Patients with purulent exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were randomized to receive either a single 400-mg daily dose of cefixime or 250 mg of cephalexin, orally, four times a day. Patients were males with a mean age of 63 years. Of the 86 patients, 71 (82%) had bronchitis caused by a single organism (29 by Haemophilus influenzae, 27 by Branhamella catarrhalis, 9 by gram-negative enteric organisms, 6 by Streptococcus pneumoniae), while more than one pathogen was implicated in 15 patients (18%). A total of 70.8% of the cefixime group and 50% of the cephalexin group were clinically cured (chi 2 = 3.89, P less than 0.05); however, when the categories of cured and improved were combined, no significant difference was noted between treatment groups (chi 2 = 3.39, P = 0.06). Analysis of side effects included all 130 evaluable and nonevaluable patients: diarrhea was noted in six patients in the cefixime group and none of the patients in the cephalexin group (P = 0.013 by the Fisher exact test). The diarrhea was mild and self-limited in all cases. B. catarrhalis has emerged as a major cause of exacerbation of bronchitis in our experience; there is an increased need to emphasize the examination of sputum samples by Gram staining if cost-effective antibiotic choices are to be made; any empirically chosen antibiotic should have activity against beta-lactamase-producing strains of B. catarrhalis as well as S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae. Images

Emerging pathogens in nosocomial pneumonia

The organisms responsible for nosocomial pneumonia are continuously evolving. Gramnegative bacilli have become the most common etiologic agents over the past 20 years, and with this evolution has come a better understanding of the pathogenesis of gram-negative bacillary pneumonia. Some gram-positive cocci, such as enterococci, group B beta hemolytic streptococci and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus, haven taken on new significance in nosocomial respiratory infections.Streptococcus pneumoniae, nontypeableHaemophilus influenzae andBranhamella catarrhalis are increasingly reported in hospitalized patients with chronic lung disease. Etiologic agents will change as new antibiotics are introduced. A better understanding of etiologic agents and their pathogens may be the best tool toward preventing hospital-acquired pneumonia.