Achille Pellicioli

The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks

In response to DNA damage and blocks to replication, eukaryotes activate the checkpoint pathways that prevent genomic instability and cancer by coordinating cell cycle progression with DNA repair. In budding yeast, the checkpoint response requires the Mec1-dependent activation of the Rad53 protein kinase. Active Rad53 slows DNA synthesis when DNA is damaged and prevents firing of late origins of replication. Further, rad53 mutants are unable to recover from a replication block. Mec1 and Rad53 also modulate the phosphorylation state of different DNA replication and repair enzymes. Little is known of the mechanisms by which checkpoint pathways interact with the replication apparatus when DNA is damaged or replication blocked. We used the two-dimensional gel technique to examine replication intermediates in response to hydroxyurea-induced replication blocks. Here we show that hydroxyurea-treated rad53 mutants accumulate unusual DNA structures at replication forks. The persistence of these abnormal molecules during recovery from the hydroxyurea block correlates with the inability to dephosphorylate Rad53. Further, Rad53 is required to properly maintain stable replication forks during the block. We propose that Rad53 prevents collapse of the fork when replication pauses.

DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1

A single double-strand break (DSB) induced by HO endonuclease triggers both repair by homologous recombination and activation of the Mec1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint in budding yeast. Here we report that DNA damage checkpoint activation by a DSB requires the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK1 (Cdc28) in budding yeast. CDK1 is also required for DSB-induced homologous recombination at any cell cycle stage. Inhibition of homologous recombination by using an analogue-sensitive CDK1 protein results in a compensatory increase in non-homologous end joining. CDK1 is required for efficient 5′ to 3′ resection of DSB ends and for the recruitment of both the single-stranded DNA-binding complex, RPA, and the Rad51 recombination protein. In contrast, Mre11 protein, part of the MRX complex, accumulates at unresected DSB ends. CDK1 is not required when the DNA damage checkpoint is initiated by lesions that are processed by nucleotide excision repair. Maintenance of the DSB-induced checkpoint requires continuing CDK1 activity that ensures continuing end resection. CDK1 is also important for a later step in homologous recombination, after strand invasion and before the initiation of new DNA synthesis.

Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 protein kinase is required for the execution of checkpoint arrest at multiple stages of the cell cycle. We found that Rad53 autophosphorylation activity depends on in trans phosphorylation mediated by Mec1 and does not require physical association with other proteins. Uncoupling in trans phosphorylation from autophosphorylation using a rad53 kinase‐defective mutant results in a dominant‐negative checkpoint defect. Activation of Rad53 in response to DNA damage in G1 requires the Rad9, Mec3, Ddc1, Rad17 and Rad24 checkpoint factors, while this dependence is greatly reduced in S phase cells. Furthermore, during recovery from checkpoint activation, Rad53 activity decreases through a process that does not require protein synthesis. We also found that Rad53 modulates the lagging strand replication apparatus by controlling phosphorylation of the DNA polymerase α‐primase complex in response to intra‐S DNA damage.

Recovery from Checkpoint-Mediated Arrest after Repair of a Double-Strand Break Requires Srs2 Helicase

In Saccharomyces strains in which homologous recombination is delayed sufficiently to activate the DNA damage checkpoint, Rad53p checkpoint kinase activity appears 1 hr after DSB induction and disappears soon after completion of repair. Cells lacking Srs2p helicase fail to recover even though they apparently complete DNA repair; Rad53p kinase remains activated. srs2Delta cells also fail to adapt when DSB repair is prevented. The recovery defect of srs2Delta is suppressed in mec1Delta strains lacking the checkpoint or when DSB repair occurs before checkpoint activation. Permanent preanaphase arrest of srs2Delta cells is reversed by the addition of caffeine after cells have arrested. Thus, in addition to its roles in recombination, Srs2p appears to be needed to turn off the DNA damage checkpoint.

Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 Checkpoint Kinase during Adaptation from DNA Damage–Induced G2/M Arrest

Saccharomyces cells with one unrepaired double-strand break (DSB) adapt after checkpoint-mediated G2/M arrest. Adaptation is accompanied by loss of Rad53p checkpoint kinase activity and Chk1p phosphorylation. Rad53p kinase remains elevated in yku70delta and cdc5-ad cells that fail to adapt. Permanent G2/M arrest in cells with increased single-stranded DNA is suppressed by the rfa1-t11 mutation, but this RPA mutation does not suppress permanent arrest in cdc5-ad cells. Checkpoint kinase activation and inactivation can be followed in G2-arrested cells, but there is no kinase activation in G1-arrested cells. We conclude that activation of the checkpoint kinases in response to a single DNA break is cell cycle regulated and that adaptation is an active process by which these kinases are inactivated.

Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing.

The replication checkpoint controls the integrity of replicating chromosomes by stabilizing stalled forks, thus preventing the accumulation of abnormal replication and recombination intermediates that contribute to genome instability. Checkpoint-defective cells are susceptible to rearrangements at chromosome fragile sites when replication pauses, and certain human cancer prone diseases suffer checkpoint abnormalities. It is unclear as to how the checkpoint stabilizes stalled forks and how cells sense replication blocks. We have analysed the checkpoint contribution in controlling replisome–fork association when replication pauses. We show that in yeast wild-type cells, stalled forks exhibit stable replisome complexes and the checkpoint sensors Ddc1 and Ddc2, thus activating Rad53 checkpoint kinase. Ddc1/Ddc2 recruitment on stalled forks and Rad53 activation are influenced by the single-strand-binding protein replication factor A (RFA). rad53 forks exhibit a defective association with DNA polymerases α, ɛ and δ. Further, in rad53 mutants, stalled forks progressively generate abnormal structures that turn into checkpoint signals by accumulating RFA, Ddc1 and Ddc2. We suggest that, following replication blocks, checkpoint activation mediated by RFA-ssDNA filaments stabilizes stalled forks by controlling replisome–fork association, thus preventing unscheduled recruitment of recombination enzymes that could otherwise cause the pathological processing of the forks.

Histone methyltransferase Dot1 and Rad9 inhibit single‐stranded DNA accumulation at DSBs and uncapped telomeres

Cells respond to DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and uncapped telomeres by recruiting checkpoint and repair factors to the site of lesions. Single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) is an important intermediate in the repair of DSBs and is produced also at uncapped telomeres. Here, we provide evidence that binding of the checkpoint protein Rad9, through its Tudor domain, to methylated histone H3‐K79 inhibits resection at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. Loss of DOT1 or mutations in RAD9 influence a Rad50‐dependent nuclease, leading to more rapid accumulation of ssDNA, and faster activation of the critical checkpoint kinase, Mec1. Moreover, deletion of RAD9 or DOT1 partially bypasses the requirement for CDK1 in DSB resection. Interestingly, Dot1 contributes to checkpoint activation in response to low levels of telomere uncapping but is not essential with high levels of uncapping. We suggest that both Rad9 and histone H3 methylation allow transmission of the damage signal to checkpoint kinases, and keep resection of damaged DNA under control influencing, both positively and negatively, checkpoint cascades and contributing to a tightly controlled response to DNA damage.

Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity.

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the rate of DNA replication is slowed down in response to DNA damage as a result of checkpoint activation, which is mediated by the Mec1 and Rad53 protein kinases. We found that the Srs2 DNA helicase, which is involved in DNA repair and recombination, is phosphorylated in response to intra‐S DNA damage in a checkpoint‐dependent manner. DNA damage‐induced Srs2 phosphorylation also requires the activity of the cyclin‐dependent kinase Cdk1, suggesting that the checkpoint pathway might modulate Cdk1 activity in response to DNA damage. Moreover, srs2 mutants fail to activate Rad53 properly and to slow down DNA replication in response to intra‐S DNA damage. The residual Rad53 activity observed in srs2 cells depends upon the checkpoint proteins Rad17 and Rad24. Moreover, DNA damage‐induced lethality in rad17 mutants depends partially upon Srs2, suggesting that a functional Srs2 helicase causes accumulation of lethal events in a checkpoint‐defective context. Altogether, our data implicate Srs2 in the Mec1 and Rad53 pathway and connect the checkpoint response to DNA repair and recombination.

DNA damage checkpoints and DNA replication controls in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In response to genotoxic agents and cell cycle blocks all eukaryotic cells activate a set of surveillance mechanims called checkpoints. A subset of these mechanisms is represented by the DNA damage checkpoint, which is triggered by DNA lesions. The activation of this signal transduction pathway leads to a delay of cell cycle progression to prevent replication and segregation of damaged DNA molecules, and to induce transcription of several DNA repair genes. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been invaluable in genetically dissecting the DNA damage checkpoint pathway and recent findings have provided new insights into the architecture of checkpoint protein complexes, in their order of function and in the mechanisms controlling DNA replication in response to DNA damage.

A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response.

The temperature‐sensitive yeast DNA primase mutant pri1‐M4 fails to execute an early step of DNA replication and exhibits a dominant, allele‐specific sensitivity to DNA‐damaging agents. pri1‐M4 is defective in slowing down the rate of S phase progression and partially delaying the G1–S transition in response to DNA damage. Conversely, the G2 DNA damage response and the S–M checkpoint coupling completion of DNA replication to mitosis are unaffected. The signal transduction pathway leading to Rad53p phosphorylation induced by DNA damage is proficient in pri1‐M4, and cell cycle delay caused by Rad53p overexpression is counteracted by the pri1‐M4 mutation. Altogether, our results suggest that DNA primase plays an essential role in a subset of the Rad53p‐dependent checkpoint pathways controlling cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage.