Adam J. Purdy
University of California, Irvine
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Adam J. Purdy.
Water Resources Research | 2017
Joshua B. Fisher; Forrest Melton; Elizabeth M. Middleton; Christopher R. Hain; Martha C. Anderson; Richard G. Allen; Matthew F. McCabe; Simon J. Hook; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Philip A. Townsend; Ayse Kilic; Kevin Tu; Diego Gonzalez Miralles; Johan Perret; Jean-Pierre Lagouarde; Duane E. Waliser; Adam J. Purdy; Andrew N. French; David Schimel; James S. Famiglietti; Graeme L. Stephens; Eric F. Wood
The fate of the terrestrial biosphere is highly uncertain given recent and projected changes in climate. This is especially acute for impacts associated with changes in drought frequency and intensity on the distribution and timing of water availability. The development of effective adaptation strategies for these emerging threats to food and water security are compromised by limitations in our understanding of how natural and managed ecosystems are responding to changing hydrological and climatological regimes. This information gap is exacerbated by insufficient monitoring capabilities from local to global scales. Here, we describe how evapotranspiration (ET) represents the key variable in linking ecosystem functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and water resources, and highlight both the outstanding science and applications questions and the actions, especially from a space-based perspective, necessary to advance them.
Geophysical Research Letters | 2016
Stephanie L. Castle; John T. Reager; Brian F. Thomas; Adam J. Purdy; Min-Hui Lo; James S. Famiglietti; Qiuhong Tang
The complexity involved in accurate estimation and numerical simulation of regional evapotranspiration (ET) can lead to inconsistency among techniques, usually attributed to methodological deficiencies. Here we hypothesize instead that discrepancies in ET estimates should be expected in some cases and can be applied to measure the effect of anthropogenic influences in developed river basins. We compare an ensemble of corrected ET estimates from land surface models with Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer satellite-based estimates in the intensively managed Colorado River Basin to contrast the roles of natural variability and human impacts. Satellite-based approaches yield larger annual amplitudes in ET estimates than land surface model simulations, primarily during the growing season. We find a total satellite-based ET flux of 142 +/- 7MAF yr(-1) (175 +/- 8.63 km(3) yr(-1)), with 38% due to anthropogenic influences during summer months. We evaluate our estimates by comparison with reservoir storage and usage allotment components of the basin water management budget.
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Adam J. Purdy; Joshua B. Fisher; Michael L. Goulden; James S. Famiglietti
Uncertainty in ground heat flux (G) means that evaluation of the other terms in the surface energy balance (e.g., latent and sensible heat fluxes (LE and H)) remains problematic. Algorithms that calculate LE and H require available energy, the difference between net radiation, RNET, and G. There are a wide range of approaches to model G for large-scale applications, with a subsequent wide range of estimates and accuracies. We provide the largest review of these methods to date (N = 6), evaluating modeled G against measured G from 88 FLUXNET sites. The instantaneous midday variability in G is best captured by models forced with net radiation, while models forced by temperature show the least error at both instantaneous and daily time scales. We produce global decadal data sets of G to illustrate regional and seasonal sensitivities, as well as uncertainty. Global model mean midmorning instantaneous G is highest during September, October, and November at 63.42 (±16.84) Wm−2, while over December, January, and February G is lowest at 53.86 (±18.09) Wm−2 but shows greater intermodel uncertainty. Results from this work have the potential to improve evapotranspiration estimates and guide appropriate G model selection and development for various land uses.
Scientific Reports | 2018
Elias Massoud; Adam J. Purdy; Michelle E. Miro; James S. Famiglietti
Accurate and detailed knowledge of California’s groundwater is of paramount importance for statewide water resources planning and management, and to sustain a multi-billion-dollar agriculture industry during prolonged droughts. In this study, we use water supply and demand information from California’s Department of Water Resources to develop an aggregate groundwater storage model for California’s Central Valley. The model is evaluated against 34 years of historic estimates of changes in groundwater storage derived from the United States Geological Survey’s Central Valley Hydrologic Model (USGS CVHM) and NASA’s Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (NASA GRACE) satellites. The calibrated model is then applied to predict future changes in groundwater storage for the years 2015–2050 under various precipitation scenarios from downscaled climate projections. We also discuss and project potential management strategies across different annual supply and demand variables and how they affect changes in groundwater storage. All simulations support the need for collective statewide management intervention to prevent continued depletion of groundwater availability.
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology | 2018
Carl Talsma; Stephen P. Good; C. Jiménez; Brecht Martens; Joshua B. Fisher; Diego Gonzalez Miralles; Matthew F. McCabe; Adam J. Purdy
Remote Sensing of Environment | 2018
Adam J. Purdy; Joshua B. Fisher; Michael L. Goulden; Andreas Colliander; Gregory Halverson; Kevin P. Tu; James S. Famiglietti
Remote Sensing | 2018
Carl Talsma; Stephen P. Good; Diego Gonzalez Miralles; Joshua B. Fisher; Brecht Martens; C. Jiménez; Adam J. Purdy
Water Resources Research | 2017
Joshua B. Fisher; Forrest Melton; Elizabeth M. Middleton; Christopher R. Hain; Martha C. Anderson; Richard G. Allen; Matthew F. McCabe; Simon J. Hook; Dennis D. Baldocchi; Philip A. Townsend; Ayse Kilic; Kevin Tu; Diego D. Miralles; Johan Perret; Jean-Pierre Lagouarde; Duane E. Waliser; Adam J. Purdy; Andrew N. French; David Schimel; James S. Famiglietti; Graeme L. Stephens; Eric F. Wood
Journal of Geophysical Research | 2016
Adam J. Purdy; Joshua B. Fisher; Michael L. Goulden; James S. Famiglietti
Geophysical Research Letters | 2016
Stephanie L. Castle; John T. Reager; Brian F. Thomas; Adam J. Purdy; Min-Hui Lo; James S. Famiglietti; Qiuhong Tang