Adrianne L. Myers
University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Adrianne L. Myers.
Journal of Trauma-injury Infection and Critical Care | 2011
Louis J. Magnotti; Ben L. Zarzaur; Peter E. Fischer; Regan F. Williams; Adrianne L. Myers; Eric H. Bradburn; Timothy C. Fabian; Martin A. Croce
BACKGROUND In light of recent data, controversy surrounds the apparent 30-day survival benefit of patients achieving a fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to packed red blood cell (PRBC) ratio of at least 1:2 in the face of massive transfusions (MT) (≥10 units of PRBC within 24 hours of admission). We hypothesized that initial studies suffer from survival bias because they do not consider early deaths secondary to uncontrolled exsanguinating hemorrhage. To help resolve this controversy, we evaluated the temporal relationship between blood product administration and mortality in civilian trauma patients receiving MT. METHODS Patients requiring MT over a 22-month period were identified from the resuscitation registry of a Level I trauma center. Shock severity at admission and timing of shock-trauma admission, blood product administration, and death were determined. Patients were divided into high- and low-ratio groups (≥1:2 and<1:2 FFP:PRBC, respectively) and compared. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test was used to examine 24-hour survival. RESULTS One hundred three patients (63% blunt) were identified (66 high-ratio and 37 low-ratio). Those patients who achieved a high-ratio in 24 hours had improved survival. However, severity of shock was less in the high-group (base excess: -8.0 vs. -11.2, p=0.028; lactate: 6.3 vs. 8.4, p=0.03). Seventy-five patients received MT within 6 hours. Of these, 29 received a high-ratio in 6 hours. Again, severity of shock was less in the high-ratio group (base excess: -7.6 vs. -12.7, p=0.008; lactate: 6.7 vs. 9.4, p=0.02). For these patients, 6-hour mortality was less in the high-group (10% vs. 48%, p<0.002). After accounting for early deaths, groups were similar from 6 hours to 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS Improved survival was observed in patients receiving a higher plasma ratio over the first 24 hours. However, temporal analysis of mortality using shorter time periods revealed those who achieve early high-ratio are in less shock and less likely to die early from uncontrolled hemorrhage compared with those who never achieve a high-ratio. Thus, the proposed survival advantage of a high-ratio may be because of selection of those not likely to die in the first place; that is, patients die with a low-ratio not because of a low-ratio.
Journal of The American College of Surgeons | 2012
Adrianne L. Myers; Regan F. Williams; Kim Giles; Teresa M. Waters; James W. Eubanks; S. Douglas Hixson; Eunice Y. Huang; Max R. Langham; Martin L. Blakely
BACKGROUND The methods of surgical care for children with perforated appendicitis are controversial. Some surgeons prefer early appendectomy; others prefer initial nonoperative management followed by interval appendectomy. Determining which of these two therapies is most cost-effective was the goal of this study. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a prospective, randomized trial in children with a preoperative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis. Patients were randomized to early or interval appendectomy. Overall hospital costs were extracted from the hospitals internal cost accounting system and the two treatment groups were compared using an intention-to-treat analysis. Nonparametric data were reported as median ± standard deviation (or range) and compared using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. RESULTS One hundred thirty-one patients were randomized to either early (n = 64) or interval (n = 67) appendectomy. Hospital charges and costs were significantly lower in patients randomized to early appendectomy. Total median hospital costs were
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | 2010
Thomas L. Sims; Mackenzie McGee; Regan F. Williams; Adrianne L. Myers; Lorraine Tracey; J. Blair Hamner; Catherine Y.C. Ng; Jianrong Wu; M. Waleed Gaber; Beth McCarville; Amit C. Nathwani; Andrew M. Davidoff
17,450 (range
Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2010
Regan F. Williams; Adrianne L. Myers; Thomas L. Sims; Catherine Y.C. Ng; Amit C. Nathwani; Andrew M. Davidoff
7,020 to
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging | 2013
Jan Sedlacik; Adrianne L. Myers; Ralf B. Loeffler; Regan F. Williams; Andrew M. Davidoff; Claudia M. Hillenbrand
55,993) for patients treated with early appendectomy vs
Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2010
Adrianne L. Myers; Regan F. Williams; Cathy Ng; Joseph E. Hartwich; Andrew M. Davidoff
22,518 (range
Surgery | 2012
Wayne S. Orr; Jason W. Denbo; Karim R. Saab; Adrianne L. Myers; Catherine Y.C. Ng; Junfang Zhou; Christopher L. Morton; Lawrence M. Pfeffer; Andrew M. Davidoff
4,722 to
Anticancer Research | 2010
Regan F. Williams; Thomas L. Sims; Lorraine Tracey; Adrianne L. Myers; Catherine Y.C. Ng; Helen Poppleton; Amit C. Nathwani; Andrew M. Davidoff
135,338) for those in the interval appendectomy group. Median hospital costs more than doubled in patients who experienced an adverse event (
Journal of Pediatric Surgery | 2012
Adrianne L. Myers; W. Shannon Orr; Jason W. Denbo; Catherine Y.C. Ng; Junfang Zhou; Yunyu Spence; Jianrong Wu; Andrew M. Davidoff
15,245 vs
Journal of Surgical Research | 2011
Wayne S. Orr; Jason W. Denbo; Cathy Ng; Adrianne L. Myers; Christopher L. Morton; Karim R. Saab; Lawrence M. Pfeffer; Andrew M. Davidoff
35,391, p < 0.0001). Unplanned readmissions also increased costs significantly and were more frequent in patients randomized to interval appendectomy. CONCLUSIONS In a prospective randomized trial, hospital charges and costs were significantly lower for early appendectomy when compared with interval appendectomy. The increased costs were related primarily to the significant increase in adverse events, including unplanned readmissions, seen in the interval appendectomy group.