Adrien S. J. Melquiond
Utrecht University
Network
Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.
Publication
Featured researches published by Adrien S. J. Melquiond.
Journal of Molecular Biology | 2016
G.C.P. van Zundert; João Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues; M. Trellet; Christophe Schmitz; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Ezgi Karaca; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; M. van Dijk; S.J. de Vries; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
The prediction of the quaternary structure of biomolecular macromolecules is of paramount importance for fundamental understanding of cellular processes and drug design. In the era of integrative structural biology, one way of increasing the accuracy of modeling methods used to predict the structure of biomolecular complexes is to include as much experimental or predictive information as possible in the process. This has been at the core of our information-driven docking approach HADDOCK. We present here the updated version 2.2 of the HADDOCK portal, which offers new features such as support for mixed molecule types, additional experimental restraints and improved protocols, all of this in a user-friendly interface. With well over 6000 registered users and 108,000 jobs served, an increasing fraction of which on grid resources, we hope that this timely upgrade will help the community to solve important biological questions and further advance the field. The HADDOCK2.2 Web server is freely accessible to non-profit users at http://haddock.science.uu.nl/services/HADDOCK2.2.
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics | 2010
Ezgi Karaca; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Sjoerd J. de Vries; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
Over the last years, large scale proteomics studies have generated a wealth of information of biomolecular complexes. Adding the structural dimension to the resulting interactomes represents a major challenge that classical structural experimental methods alone will have difficulties to confront. To meet this challenge, complementary modeling techniques such as docking are thus needed. Among the current docking methods, HADDOCK (High Ambiguity-Driven DOCKing) distinguishes itself from others by the use of experimental and/or bioinformatics data to drive the modeling process and has shown a strong performance in the critical assessment of prediction of interactions (CAPRI), a blind experiment for the prediction of interactions. Although most docking programs are limited to binary complexes, HADDOCK can deal with multiple molecules (up to six), a capability that will be required to build large macromolecular assemblies. We present here a novel web interface of HADDOCK that allows the user to dock up to six biomolecules simultaneously. This interface allows the inclusion of a large variety of both experimental and/or bioinformatics data and supports several types of cyclic and dihedral symmetries in the docking of multibody assemblies. The server was tested on a benchmark of six cases, containing five symmetric homo-oligomeric protein complexes and one symmetric protein-DNA complex. Our results reveal that, in the presence of either bioinformatics and/or experimental data, HADDOCK shows an excellent performance: in all cases, HADDOCK was able to generate good to high quality solutions and ranked them at the top, demonstrating its ability to model symmetric multicomponent assemblies. Docking methods can thus play an important role in adding the structural dimension to interactomes. However, although the current docking methodologies were successful for a vast range of cases, considering the variety and complexity of macromolecular assemblies, inclusion of some kind of experimental information (e.g. from mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, cryoelectron microscopy, etc.) will remain highly desirable to obtain reliable results.
PLOS ONE | 2013
Mikael Trellet; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
Protein-peptide interactions are vital for the cell. They mediate, inhibit or serve as structural components in nearly 40% of all macromolecular interactions, and are often associated with diseases, making them interesting leads for protein drug design. In recent years, large-scale technologies have enabled exhaustive studies on the peptide recognition preferences for a number of peptide-binding domain families. Yet, the paucity of data regarding their molecular binding mechanisms together with their inherent flexibility makes the structural prediction of protein-peptide interactions very challenging. This leaves flexible docking as one of the few amenable computational techniques to model these complexes. We present here an ensemble, flexible protein-peptide docking protocol that combines conformational selection and induced fit mechanisms. Starting from an ensemble of three peptide conformations (extended, a-helix, polyproline-II), flexible docking with HADDOCK generates 79.4% of high quality models for bound/unbound and 69.4% for unbound/unbound docking when tested against the largest protein-peptide complexes benchmark dataset available to date. Conformational selection at the rigid-body docking stage successfully recovers the most relevant conformation for a given protein-peptide complex and the subsequent flexible refinement further improves the interface by up to 4.5 Å interface RMSD. Cluster-based scoring of the models results in a selection of near-native solutions in the top three for ∼75% of the successfully predicted cases. This unified conformational selection and induced fit approach to protein-peptide docking should open the route to the modeling of challenging systems such as disorder-order transitions taking place upon binding, significantly expanding the applicability limit of biomolecular interaction modeling by docking.
Current Alzheimer Research | 2008
Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Xiao Dong; Normand Mousseau; Philippe Derreumaux
Self-assembly of the 40/42 amino acid A! peptide is a key player in Alzheimers disease. A! 40 is the most prevalent species, while A! 42 is the most toxic. It has been suggested that the amino acids 21-30 could nucleate the fold- ing of A! monomer and a bent in this region could be the rate-limiting step in A! fibril formation. In this study, we review our current understanding of the computer-predicted conformations of amino acids 23-28 in the monomer of A! (21-30) and the monomers A! 40 and A! 42. On the basis of new simulations on dimers of full-length A! , we propose that the rate- limiting step involves the formation of a multimeric ! -sheet spanning the central hydrophobic core (residues 17-21).
Proteins | 2006
Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Normand Mousseau; Philippe Derreumaux
Alzheimers, Parkinsons, and Creutzfeldt‐Jakobs neurodegenerative diseases are all linked with the assembly of normally soluble proteins into amyloid fibrils. Because of experimental limitations, structural characterization of the soluble oligomers, which form early in the process of fibrillogenesis and are cytotoxic, remains to be determined. In this article, we study the aggregation paths of seven chains of the shortest amyloid‐forming peptide, using an activitated method and a reduced atomic representation. Our simulations show that disordered KFFE monomers ultimately form three distinct topologies of similar energy: amorphous oligomers, incomplete rings with β‐barrel character, and cross‐β‐sheet structures with the meridional but not the equatorial X‐ray fiber reflections. The simulations also shed light on the pathways from misfolded aggregates to fibrillar‐like structures. They also underline the multiplicity of building blocks that can lead to the formation of the critical nucleus from which rapid growth of the fibril occurs. Proteins 2006.
Journal of Chemical Physics | 2005
Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Geneviève Boucher; Normand Mousseau; Philippe Derreumaux
There is experimental evidence suggesting that the toxicity of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimers disease may result from the soluble intermediate oligomers. It is therefore important to characterize extensively the early steps of oligomer formation at atomic level. As these structures are metastable and short lived, experimental data are difficult to obtain and they must be complemented with numerical simulations. In this work, we use the activation-relaxation technique coupled with a coarse-grained energy model to study in detail the mechanisms of aggregation of four lys-phe-phe-glu (KFFE) peptides. This is the shortest peptide known to form amyloid fibrils in vitro. Our simulations indicate that four KFFE peptides adopt a variety of oligomeric states (tetramers, trimers, and dimers) with various orientations of the chains in rapid equilibrium. This conformational distribution is consistent with all-atom molecular-dynamics simulations in explicit solvent and is sequence dependent; as seen experimentally, the lys-pro-gly-glu (KPGE) peptides adopt disordered structures in solution. Our unbiased simulations also indicate that the assembly process is much more complex than previously thought and point to intermediate structures which likely are kinetic traps for longer chains.
Proteins | 2012
João Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues; Mikael Trellet; Christophe Schmitz; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Ezgi Karaca; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
Inaccuracies in computational molecular modeling methods are often counterweighed by brute‐force generation of a plethora of putative solutions. These are then typically sieved via structural clustering based on similarity measures such as the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of atomic positions. Albeit widely used, these measures suffer from several theoretical and technical limitations (e.g., choice of regions for fitting) that impair their application in multicomponent systems (N > 2), large‐scale studies (e.g., interactomes), and other time‐critical scenarios. We present here a simple similarity measure for structural clustering based on atomic contacts—the fraction of common contacts—and compare it with the most used similarity measure of the protein docking community—interface backbone RMSD. We show that this method produces very compact clusters in remarkably short time when applied to a collection of binary and multicomponent protein–protein and protein–DNA complexes. Furthermore, it allows easy clustering of similar conformations of multicomponent symmetrical assemblies in which chain permutations can occur. Simple contact‐based metrics should be applicable to other structural biology clustering problems, in particular for time‐critical or large‐scale endeavors.Proteins 2012;
Proteins | 2014
Marc F. Lensink; Iain H. Moal; Paul A. Bates; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Ezgi Karaca; Christophe Schmitz; Marc van Dijk; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin; Miriam Eisenstein; Brian Jiménez-García; Solène Grosdidier; Albert Solernou; Laura Pérez-Cano; Chiara Pallara; Juan Fernández-Recio; Jianqing Xu; Pravin Muthu; Krishna Praneeth Kilambi; Jeffrey J. Gray; Sergei Grudinin; Georgy Derevyanko; Julie C. Mitchell; John Wieting; Eiji Kanamori; Yuko Tsuchiya; Yoichi Murakami; Joy Sarmiento; Daron M. Standley; Matsuyuki Shirota
We report the first assessment of blind predictions of water positions at protein–protein interfaces, performed as part of the critical assessment of predicted interactions (CAPRI) community‐wide experiment. Groups submitting docking predictions for the complex of the DNase domain of colicin E2 and Im2 immunity protein (CAPRI Target 47), were invited to predict the positions of interfacial water molecules using the method of their choice. The predictions—20 groups submitted a total of 195 models—were assessed by measuring the recall fraction of water‐mediated protein contacts. Of the 176 high‐ or medium‐quality docking models—a very good docking performance per se—only 44% had a recall fraction above 0.3, and a mere 6% above 0.5. The actual water positions were in general predicted to an accuracy level no better than 1.5 Å, and even in good models about half of the contacts represented false positives. This notwithstanding, three hotspot interface water positions were quite well predicted, and so was one of the water positions that is believed to stabilize the loop that confers specificity in these complexes. Overall the best interface water predictions was achieved by groups that also produced high‐quality docking models, indicating that accurate modelling of the protein portion is a determinant factor. The use of established molecular mechanics force fields, coupled to sampling and optimization procedures also seemed to confer an advantage. Insights gained from this analysis should help improve the prediction of protein–water interactions and their role in stabilizing protein complexes. Proteins 2014; 82:620–632.
Proteins | 2013
João Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Ezgi Karaca; Mikael Trellet; M. van Dijk; G.C.P. van Zundert; Christophe Schmitz; S.J. de Vries; A. Bordogna; L.H. Bonati; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
Information‐driven docking is currently one of the most successful approaches to obtain structural models of protein interactions as demonstrated in the latest round of CAPRI. While various experimental and computational techniques can be used to retrieve information about the binding mode, the availability of three‐dimensional structures of the interacting partners remains a limiting factor. Fortunately, the wealth of structural information gathered by large‐scale initiatives allows for homology‐based modeling of a significant fraction of the protein universe. Defining the limits of information‐driven docking based on such homology models is therefore highly relevant. Here we show, using previous CAPRI targets, that out of a variety of measures, the global sequence identity between template and target is a simple but reliable predictor of the achievable quality of the docking models. This indicates that a well‐defined overall fold is critical for the interaction. Furthermore, the quality of the data at our disposal to characterize the interaction plays a determinant role in the success of the docking. Given reliable interface information we can obtain acceptable predictions even at low global sequence identity. These results, which define the boundaries between trustworthy and unreliable predictions, should guide both experts and nonexperts in defining the limits of what is achievable by docking. This is highly relevant considering that the fraction of the interactome amenable for docking is only bound to grow as the number of experimentally solved structures increases. Proteins 2013; 81:2119–2128.
Proteins | 2010
Sjoerd J. de Vries; Adrien S. J. Melquiond; Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Ezgi Karaca; Annalisa Bordogna; Marc van Dijk; João Garcia Lopes Maia Rodrigues; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin
The recent CAPRI rounds have introduced new docking challenges in the form of protein‐RNA complexes, multiple alternative interfaces, and an unprecedented number of targets for which homology modeling was required. We present here the performance of HADDOCK and its web server in the CAPRI experiment and discuss the strengths and weaknesses of data‐driven docking. HADDOCK was successful for 6 out of 9 complexes (6 out of 11 targets) and accurately predicted the individual interfaces for two more complexes. The HADDOCK server, which is the first allowing the simultaneous docking of generic multi‐body complexes, was successful in 4 out of 7 complexes for which it participated. In the scoring experiment, we predicted the highest number of targets of any group. The main weakness of data‐driven docking revealed from these last CAPRI results is its vulnerability for incorrect experimental data related to the interface or the stoichiometry of the complex. At the same time, the use of experimental and/or predicted information is also the strength of our approach as evidenced for those targets for which accurate experimental information was available (e.g., the 10 three‐stars predictions for T40!). Even when the models show a wrong orientation, the individual interfaces are generally well predicted with an average coverage of 60% ± 26% over all targets. This makes data‐driven docking particularly valuable in a biological context to guide experimental studies like, for example, targeted mutagenesis. Proteins 2010.