Ahcène Hameg

Affinity of cyamemazine, an anxiolytic antipsychotic drug, for human recombinant dopamine vs. serotonin receptor subtypes

Animal studies indicate that the anxiolytic properties of the antipsychotic agent cyamemazine may result from blockade of serotonin 5-HT(2C) receptors and to a lesser extent from blockade of serotonin 5-HT(3) receptors. Here, we used human recombinant receptors to determine the relative affinity of cyamemazine for serotonin and dopamine receptor subtypes. In addition, cyamemazine was tested in other brain receptor types and subtypes which are considered to mediate central nervous systems effects of drugs. Hence, cyamemazine affinity was determined in human recombinant receptors expressed in CHO cells (hD(2), hD(3), and hD(4.4) receptors, h5-HT(1A), h5-HT(2A), h5-HT(2C), and h5-HT(7), and hM(1), hM(2), hM(3), hM(4), and hM(5) receptors), L-cells (hD(1) receptor), and HEK-293 cells (h5-HT(3) receptors) or natively present in N1E-115 cells (5-HT(3) receptors) or in rat cerebral cortex (non-specific alpha(1)- and alpha(2)-adrenoceptors, GABA(A) and GABA(B) receptors, H(3) histamine receptors), and guinea-pig cerebellum (H(1) central and H(2) histamine receptors) membranes. Similarly to atypical antipsychotics, cyamemazine exhibited high affinity for: (i) h5-HT(2A) receptors (K(i)=1.5+/-0.7 nM, mean+/-SEM, N=3) and this was four times higher than for hD(2) receptors (K(i)=5.8+/-0.8 nM), (ii) h5-HT(2C) receptors (K(i)=11.8+/-2.2nM), and (iii) 5-HT(7) receptors (K(i)=22 nM). Conversely, cyamemazine exhibited very low affinity for h5-HT(3) receptors (K(i)=2.9+/-0.4 microM). In conclusion, similarly to atypical antipsychotic agents, cyamemazine, possesses high affinity for h5-HT(2A), h5-HT(2C), and h5-HT(7) receptors, a feature which can explain its low propensity to cause extrapyramidal adverse reactions in clinical practice. The high affinity for h5-HT(2C) receptors, but not for h5-HT(3) receptors, can account for the anxiolytic activity of cyamemazine in human subjects.

Neuroprotective effect of riluzole in acute noise-induced hearing loss

Riluzole has been reported to protect against the deleterious effect of cerebral ischemia by blocking glutamatergic neurotransmission. Here, we investigated whether acoustic trauma-induced cochlear excitotoxicity could be attenuated by riluzole. Cumulative intracochlear perfusion of riluzole completely abolished single-nerve fiber activity in the guinea pig cochlea and the compound action potential of the auditory nerve. Guinea pigs treated with riluzole (100 μM) showed significantly less hearing threshold shift than untreated guinea pigs, and presented no sign of dendritic damage in the cochlea observable by electron microscopy. When coapplied with glutamate, riluzole did not prevent glutamate-induced swelling of auditory nerve dendrites, suggesting that the protective effect of riluzole was mediated principally by inhibition of glutamate release from sensory inner hair cells.

Investigational drugs in recent clinical trials for treatment-resistant depression.

ABSTRACT Introduction: The authors describe the medications for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in phase II/III of clinical development in the EU and USA and provide an opinion on how current treatment can be improved in the near future. Areas covered: Sixty-two trials were identified in US and EU clinical trial registries that included six investigational compounds in recent phase III development and 12 others in recent phase II clinical trials. Glutamatergic agents have been the focus of many studies. A single intravenous dose of the glutamatergic modulator ketamine produces a robust and rapid antidepressant effect in persons with TRD; this effect continues to remain significant for 1 week. This observation was a turning point that opened the way for other, more selective glutamatergic modulators (intranasal esketamine, AVP-786, AVP-923, AV-101, and rapastinel). Of the remaining compounds, monoclonal antibodies open highly innovative therapeutic options, based on new pathophysiological approaches to depression. Expert commentary: Promising new agents are emerging for TRD treatment. Glutamatergic modulators likely represent a very promising alternative to monoaminergic antidepressant monotherapy. We could see the arrival of the first robust and rapid acting antidepressant drug in the near future, which would strongly facilitate the ultimate goal of recovery in persons with TRD.

Therapeutic improvements expected in the near future for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: an appraisal of phase III clinical trials of schizophrenia-targeted therapies as found in US and EU clinical trial registries

ABSTRACT Introduction: In this review, the authors describe medications in phase III of clinical development for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, and provide an opinion on how current treatment can be improved in the near future. Areas covered: Recent (post 2013) phase III clinical trials of schizophrenia-targeted therapies were found in US and EU clinical trial registries. Two hundred fifty-three trials were identified, that included 16 investigational compounds. The antipsychotics brexpiprazole and cariprazine have been approved in the US, and although both are dopamine D2 receptor partial agonists, they differ markedly in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Encenicline and valbenazine are first-in-class candidates for treatment of cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) and tardive dyskinesia, respectively. Eleven add-on compounds were previously approved for other therapeutic indications and are for the most part being studied at academic medical centers and smaller pharmaceutical companies for negative symptoms and CIAS or for specific populations (comorbidities, antipsychotic-induced obesity). Expert opinion: Promising new agents are emerging for schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. In addition to better-tolerated antipsychotics that treat positive symptoms, we could see the arrival of the first effective drug for negative symptoms and CIAS, which would strongly facilitate the ultimate goal of recovery in persons with schizophrenia.

Investigational drugs for anxiety in patients with schizophrenia

Introduction: Anxiety is a frequent symptom of schizophrenia, which is highly associated with an increased risk of relapse and suicide. The effect of antipsychotics on this clinical dimension is not specific and the common practice of prescribing benzodiazepines remains unsatisfactory. Areas covered: The authors review recent well-designed clinical trials for anxiety in patients with schizophrenia. The content includes information derived from trial databases, regulatory authorities and scientific literature. Expert opinion: Anxiety in schizophrenia has severe consequences and specific clinical features, which require a specific therapy, beyond benzodiazepines. In these past 2 years, two compounds (the anticonvulsant/anxiolytic pregabalin and the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine) were on Phase III/IV clinical trials for schizophrenia, with comorbid anxiety as a primary outcome measure. Potential for success is high, given their strong rationale and the clinical experience with both drugs. Anxiety (as a symptom) was a secondary outcome measure in trials for schizophrenia involving seven other compounds (lurasidone, amisulpride, bitopertin, oxytocin, famotidine, cannabidiol and the L-theanine and pregnenolone combination). Primary completion date is expected in the next 2 years. In spite of ancient positive results and a strong rationale, aripiprazole and related compounds were not in recent clinical trials. The authors believe that these compounds deserve more attention.

Bipolar disorder: recent clinical trials and emerging therapies for depressive episodes and maintenance treatment

Bipolar disorder (BD) is one of the worlds ten most disabling conditions. More options are urgently needed for treating bipolar depressive episodes and for safer, more tolerable long-term maintenance treatment. We reviewed 30 recent clinical trials in depressive episodes (eight tested compounds) and 14 clinical trials in maintenance treatment (ten tested compounds). Positive results in Phase III trials, regulatory approval and/or new therapeutic indications were obtained with some of the developing drugs, particularly for depressive episodes. The current BD pipeline is encouraging with promising new compounds, acting on novel pharmacological targets and on specific aspects of bipolar depression.

5-HT2A receptor antagonist properties of cyamemazine in rat and guinea pig smooth muscle

5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism seems to explain the low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects with atypical neuroleptics. Whether the neuroleptic cyamemazine, which at low doses is also devoid of extrapyramidal side effects, possesses 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist properties is unknown. Cyamemazine was tested for its ability to antagonize 5-HT(2A)-mediated responses in isolated rat aorta and guinea pig trachea and to displace [3H]ketanserin specifically bound to rat brain membranes. In isolated rat aorta, cyamemazine potently and competitively antagonized serotonin-dependent contractions (pA(2)=8.82+/-0.26, n=7; Schilds slope=1.02+/-0.29). In this test, cyamemazine was of similar potency as ketanserin (pA(2)=8.23). In isolated guinea pig trachea, cyamemazine reduced maximum contractile responses to serotonin with pIC(50)=7.92+/-0.35, (n=4), whereas ketanserin exhibited a pIC(50)=8.79. Finally, cyamemazine displaced [3H]ketanserin specifically bound to rat brain membranes with pK(i)=8.76+/-0.53 (n=3). In conclusion, cyamemazine behaves as a potent antagonist at 5-HT(2A) receptors, which compares well with the reference compound, ketanserin. Whether this 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist action of cyamemazine can explain its low incidence of extrapyramidal side effects deserves further investigation.

Cyamemazine metabolites: effects on human cardiac ion channels in-vitro and on the QTc interval in guinea pigs.

Monodesmethyl cyamemazine and cyamemazine sulfoxide, the two main metabolites of the antipsychotic and anxiolytic phenothiazine cyamemazine, were investigated for their effects on the human ether‐à‐go‐go related gene (hERG) channel expressed in HEK 293 cells and on native INa, ICa, Ito, Isus or IK1 of human atrial myocytes. Additionally, cyamemazine metabolites were compared with terfenadine for their effects on the QT interval in anaesthetized guinea pigs. Monodesmethyl cyamemazine and cyamemazine sulfoxide reduced hERG current amplitude, with IC50 values of 0.70 and 1.53 μM, respectively. By contrast, at a concentration of 1 μM, cyamemazine metabolites failed to significantly affect INa, Ito, Isus or IK1 current amplitudes. Cyamemazine sulfoxide had no effect on ICa at 1 μM, while at this concentration, monodesmethyl cyamemazine only slightly (17%), albeit significantly, inhibited ICa current. Finally, cyamemazine metabolites (5 mg kg−1 i.v.) were unable to significantly prolong QTc values in the guinea pig. Conversely, terfenadine (5 mg kg−1 i.v.) significantly increased QTc values. In conclusion, cyamemazine metabolite concentrations required to inhibit hERG current substantially exceed those necessary to achieve therapeutic activity of the parent compound in humans. Moreover, cyamemazine metabolites, in contrast to terfenadine, do not delay cardiac repolarization in the anaesthetized guinea pig. These non‐clinical findings explain the excellent cardiac safety records of cyamemazine during its 30 years of extensive therapeutic use.