Ricardo P. Garay

Calcium Dobesilate in the Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy

The incidence of diabetic retinopathy is still increasing in developed countries. Tight glycemic control and laser therapy reduce vision loss and blindness, but do not reverse existing ocular damage and only slow the progression of the disease. New pharmacologic agents that are currently under development and are specifically directed against clearly defined biochemical targets (i.e. aldose reductase inhibitors and protein kinase C-β inhibitors) have failed to demonstrate significant efficacy in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy in clinical trials. In contrast, calcium dobesilate (2,5-dihydroxybenzenesulfonate), which was discovered more than 40 years ago and is registered for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy in more than 20 countries remains, to our knowledge, the only angioprotective agent that reduces the progression of this disease. An overall review of published studies involving calcium dobesilate (CLS 2210) depicts a rather ‘non-specific’ compound acting moderately, but significantly, on the various and complex disorders that contribute to diabetic retinopathy. Recent studies have shown that calcium dobesilate is a potent antioxidant, particularly against the highly damaging hydroxyl radical. In addition, it improves diabetic endothelial dysfunction, reduces apoptosis, and slows vascular cell proliferation.

Double-blind, comparative study of cyamemazine vs. bromazepam in the benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome.

Cyamemazine is an anxiolytic antipsychotic, which reduces ethanol withdrawal symptoms. Here, we investigated if cyamemazine can be also effective as substitute drug to facilitate benzodiazepine withdrawal. A total of 168 patients treated with benzodiazepines for at least 3 months and with a <18 score in the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) were included in the study. Previous benzodiazepine treatment was withdrawn, and patients were randomized to a 4-week treatment with cyamemazine (25-50 mg q.d.) or bromazepam (3-6 mg q.d.), followed by 2 weeks of placebo. The primary efficacy variable was the maximal anxiety rebound as measured with the HARS during the 42 days of treatment. No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were found for the extent or incidence of rebound anxiety. Considering all dropout patients as withdrawal failures, after 6 months of follow-up, 56/84 patients in the cyamemazine group (66.7%) and 55/84 patients in the bromazepam group (65.5%) were successfully withdrawn. 28 patients in the cyamemazine group and 18 in the bromazepam group had an adverse event, including anxiety, insomnia, dry mouth and somnolence. No extra-pyramidal symptoms were reported. In conclusion, cyamemazine was comparable to bromazepam in ensuring successful benzodiazepine withdrawal and in controlling the acute benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome. Cyamemazine may be useful to facilitate benzodiazepine withdrawal in those patients where bromazepam substitution is not appropriate.

Cyamemazine metabolites: effects on human cardiac ion channels in-vitro and on the QTc interval in guinea pigs.

Monodesmethyl cyamemazine and cyamemazine sulfoxide, the two main metabolites of the antipsychotic and anxiolytic phenothiazine cyamemazine, were investigated for their effects on the human ether‐à‐go‐go related gene (hERG) channel expressed in HEK 293 cells and on native INa, ICa, Ito, Isus or IK1 of human atrial myocytes. Additionally, cyamemazine metabolites were compared with terfenadine for their effects on the QT interval in anaesthetized guinea pigs. Monodesmethyl cyamemazine and cyamemazine sulfoxide reduced hERG current amplitude, with IC50 values of 0.70 and 1.53 μM, respectively. By contrast, at a concentration of 1 μM, cyamemazine metabolites failed to significantly affect INa, Ito, Isus or IK1 current amplitudes. Cyamemazine sulfoxide had no effect on ICa at 1 μM, while at this concentration, monodesmethyl cyamemazine only slightly (17%), albeit significantly, inhibited ICa current. Finally, cyamemazine metabolites (5 mg kg−1 i.v.) were unable to significantly prolong QTc values in the guinea pig. Conversely, terfenadine (5 mg kg−1 i.v.) significantly increased QTc values. In conclusion, cyamemazine metabolite concentrations required to inhibit hERG current substantially exceed those necessary to achieve therapeutic activity of the parent compound in humans. Moreover, cyamemazine metabolites, in contrast to terfenadine, do not delay cardiac repolarization in the anaesthetized guinea pig. These non‐clinical findings explain the excellent cardiac safety records of cyamemazine during its 30 years of extensive therapeutic use.