Aishi Kimoto

Micro-CT imaging analysis for the effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on inflammatory bone destruction in adjuvant arthritis rats

Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 is known to play an important role in the differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts. However, the role of COX-1 in bone metabolism has not been well explored. In this study, the bone-conserving effects of COX-2-specific (celecoxib), COX-nonselective (loxoprofen), and COX-1-specific agents (SC-58560) were compared using an adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) rat model. Arthritis was induced by injecting 50 μl liquid paraffin containing 1 mg Mycobacterium butyricum into the left footpad of Lewis rats. Drugs were given orally twice daily for 10 days beginning 15 days after adjuvant injection. Celecoxib was administered at the rate of 3 mg/kg per day, loxoprofen at 3 mg/kg per day, and SC-58560 at 10 mg/kg per day. The therapeutic effects on 3-D architectural bone changes in the arthritic condition, e.g., the bone volume/total tissue volume ratio and the amount of trabecular bone pattern factor, were determined by analyzing the hindpaw calcaneus of AIA rats using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). In addition, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry 2-D bone analysis was performed to compare with micro-CT analysis. AIA rats are prone to substantial bone erosion, which allows for significant changes in the 3-D architectural index. This inflammatory bone destruction was suppressed potently by celecoxib, only moderately by loxoprofen, and not at all by SC-58560. These data suggest that COX-2 plays an important role in the inflammatory bone destruction that occurs with rheumatoid arthritis. The results also suggest that COX-2 is more effective than COX-1 at suppressing the destruction of bone associated with arthritis.

Suppression of Adjuvant-Induced Arthritic Bone Destruction by Cyclooxygenase-2 Selective Agents With and Without Inhibitory Potency Against Carbonic Anhydrase II†

In vitro assays revealed that COX‐2 inhibitors with CA II inhibitory potency suppressed both differentiation and activity of osteoclasts, whereas that without the potency reduced only osteoclast differentiation. However, all COX‐2 inhibitors similarly suppressed bone destruction in adjuvant‐induced arthritic rats, indicating that suppression of osteoclast differentiation is more effective than that of osteoclast activity for the treatment.

Intermittent minodronic acid treatment with sufficient bone resorption inhibition prevents reduction in bone mass and strength in ovariectomized rats with established osteopenia comparable with daily treatment

This study examined and compared the effects of four-week intermittent and daily administrations of minodronic acid, a highly potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, on bone mineral density (BMD), bone strength, bone turnover, and histomorphometry on established osteopenia in ovariectomized (OVX) rats. Fourteen-week-old female F344 rats were OVX or sham-operated. At 12 weeks post surgery, minodronic acid was orally administered once every 4 weeks at 0.2, 1, and 5 mg/kg and once daily at 0.006, 0.03, and 0.15 mg/kg for 12 months. The total dosing amount was comparable between the two dosing regimens. The levels of urinary deoxypyridinoline and serum osteocalcin were measured to assess bone turnover. BMD as assessed via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bone structure and dynamical changes in vertebral trabecula and biomechanical properties were measured ex vivo at 12 months to assess bone content and material properties. Minodronic acid dose-dependently ameliorated the decrease in BMD of lumbar vertebrae and the femur in both treatment regimens similarly. Minodronic acid suppressed elevated urinary levels of deoxypyridinoline, a bone resorption marker, and reduced the serum levels of osteocalcin, a bone formation marker. In the mechanical test at 12 months of treatment, minodronic acid dose-dependently ameliorated the reduction in bone strength in femur and vertebral body. There is no significant difference in parameters between the two regimens except maximal load of lower doses in lumbar vertebral body and absorption energy of middle doses in femur. With these parameters with significant differences, values of the intermittent regimen were significantly lower than that of daily repeated regimen. Bone histomorphometric analysis of the lumbar vertebral body showed that minodronic acid significantly ameliorated the decrease in bone mass, trabecular thickness and number, and the increase in trabecular separation, bone resorption indices (Oc.S/BS and N.Oc/BS), and bone formation indices (BFR/BS, MAR and OV/BV) in both regimens. Minodronic acid suppressed OVX-induced increases in bone turnover at the tissue level and ameliorated all structural indices, thereby improving the deterioration of bone quality under osteoporotic disease conditions regardless of the regimen. In conclusion, a four-week intermittent treatment of minodronic acid suppressed increased bone resorption as daily treatment when considering the total administered dose in OVX rats with established osteopenia. The improvement of microarchitectural destruction in low dose of intermittent treatment was weaker than that observed in a daily repeated regimen; however the effects of high and middle doses of intermittent treatment were equivalent to that observed in daily repeated regimen accompanied by sufficient bone resorption inhibition in rats. These findings suggest that minodronic acid at an appropriate dose in an intermittent regimen may be as clinically useful in osteoporosis therapy as in daily treatment.