Akin Cil

Integrity and function of the subscapularis after total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Reported healing rates of a subscapularis tenotomy have been extremely variable in the literature. The purpose of this study was to document the subscapularis healing rate after subscapularis tenotomy using ultrasound, and to correlate healing with physical examination findings and shoulder internal rotation strength. METHODS Fifteen patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty due to unilateral osteoarthritis were evaluated after a minimum of 6 months follow-up with ultrasound, physical examination, and internal rotation strength testing. At surgery, a subscapularis tenotomy utilized to approach the shoulder. Postoperatively, no formal physical therapy program was utilized. RESULTS Seven of the 15 shoulders had a complete tear of the repaired subscapularis tendon based on ultrasound examination. The lift-off and abdominal compression tests correlated poorly with the ultrasonographic condition of the subscapularis. The bear hug test using dynamometry did correlate with tendon integrity. Patients with a subscapularis tear after arthroplasty experienced significant weakness in isometric (P = .01) and isokinetic (P < .01) internal rotation strength testing, as well as significantly worse DASH scores (P = .04). No patient demonstrated anterior subluxation on examination or by radiograph. CONCLUSION Subscapularis tear after total shoulder arthroplasty is a common finding, which cannot be diagnosed reliably by physical examination or radiographs. In this population, subscapularis integrity did not correlate with pain or subjective patient outcome. Failure to heal the subscapularis tenotomy is probably more common than has been previously reported based on only physical examination testing.

Biomechanical comparison of lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis tenotomy in total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Total shoulder arthroplasty is traditionally performed through an anterior deltopectoral exposure with subscapularis tenotomy. Postoperative subscapularis dysfunction is common and adversely affects clinical outcomes. Consequently, surgeon interest in lesser tuberosity osteotomy has grown in an effort to improve subscapularis repair strength. This study investigated the biomechanical strength of subscapularis tenotomy vs lesser tuberosity osteotomy in the setting of total shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS Uncemented humeral prostheses were placed in 20 paired upper extremities from 10 cadavers. For each respective cadaver, 1 limb underwent lesser tuberosity osteotomy and the contralateral limb underwent subscapularis tenotomy. The cadaveric specimens then underwent cyclic displacement and maximum load to failure testing. RESULTS The subscapularis tenotomy specimens exhibited significantly less cyclic displacement (0.8 mm) than the osteotomy group (1.8 mm), with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference of 0.5 to 1.5 mm (P = 0.002). The maximum load to failure was 439 ± 96 N for tenotomy and 447 ± 89 N for osteotomy (95% CI for the difference of -58 to 75), which was not significant (P = .78). CONCLUSION Lesser tuberosity osteotomy was not significantly stronger than subscapularis tenotomy in maximum load to failure testing, with minimal clinical significance set at 100 N. Subscapularis tenotomy repair showed statistically significant less cyclic displacement than lesser tuberosity osteotomy. Further research is needed to clarify how the biomechanical results immediately after subscapularis tenotomy and lesser tuberosity osteotomy correlate with clinical outcomes.

Nonstandard glenoid components for bone deficiencies in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND Glenoid bone deficiencies may be addressed by specialized components. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of 3 different types of nonstandard glenoid components. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-eight patients with a mean age of 65 years (range, 34-84 years) underwent a primary or revision anatomic shoulder arthroplasty with one of 3 nonstandard glenoid components: a polyethylene component with an angled keel for posterior glenoid wear without posterior subluxation; a polyethylene component with 2 mm of extra thickness for central glenoid erosion; or a posteriorly augmented metal-backed glenoid component for posterior glenoid wear and posterior subluxation. Average clinical follow-up was 7.3 years (range, 2-19 years) or until revision surgery. RESULTS At the most recent follow-up, 24 patients had no, mild, or occasionally moderate pain. Mean elevation improved from 91° to 126°, and mean external rotation improved from 24° to 53°. Thirteen patients had moderate or severe subluxation preoperatively, and 11 had subluxation at follow-up. On radiographic evaluation, 3 glenoid components had loosened and 3 were at risk for loosening at an average 5.5 years of follow-up. Seven patients had revision surgery: 4 for instability, 1 for osteolysis, 1 for component loosening with osteolysis, and 1 for a periprosthetic fracture. Three additional patients had removal of glenoid components, 2 for infection and 1 for loosening. Ten-year survival rate free of revision or removal of the angled keel component was 73% (95% CI: 75.3-70.7); of the extra thick (+2 mm) component, 69% (95% CI: 65-73); and of the posteriorly augmented metal-backed glenoid component, 31% (95% CI: 35.6-26.4). CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of nonstandard glenoid components in addressing glenoid bone deficiencies is compromised by an increased rate of component loosening and by only partial success in eliminating subluxation.

Prediction of elbow joint contact mechanics in the multibody framework.

Computational multibody musculoskeletal models of the elbow joint that are capable of simultaneous and accurate predictions of muscle and ligament forces, along with cartilage contact mechanics can be immensely useful in clinical practice. As a step towards producing a musculoskeletal model that includes the interaction between cartilage and muscle loading, the goal of this study was to develop subject-specific multibody models of the elbow joint with discretized humerus cartilage representation interacting with the radius and ulna cartilages through deformable contacts. The contact parameters for the compliant contact law were derived using simplified elastic foundation contact theory. The models were then validated by placing the model in a virtual mechanical tester for flexion-extension motion similar to a cadaver experiment, and the resulting kinematics were compared. Two cadaveric upper limbs were used in this study. The humeral heads were subjected to axial motion in a mechanical tester and the resulting kinematics from three bones were recorded for model validation. The maximum RMS error between the predicted and measured kinematics during the complete testing cycle was 2.7 mm medial-lateral translation and 9.7° varus-valgus rotation of radius relative to humerus (for elbow 2). After model validation, a lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) deficient condition was simulated and, contact pressures and kinematics were compared to the intact elbow model. A noticeable difference in kinematics, contact area, and contact pressure were observed for LUCL deficient condition. LUCL deficiency induced higher internal rotations for both the radius and ulna during flexion and an associated medial shift of the articular contact area.

Distal Humeral Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Acute Distal Humeral Fractures

For acute distal humeral fractures not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation, total elbow arthroplasty has become an established alternative. However, lifelong activity restrictions designed to prevent early mechanical failure make this a poor option for some patients. This has led to a renewed interest in distal humeral hemiarthroplasty. Using modern implants and techniques, distal humeral hemiarthroplasty has shown outcomes comparable to those of total elbow arthroplasty at short- to mid-term follow-up, with an overall higher but different complication rate. Long-term data are needed, but the available literature suggests that distal humeral hemiarthroplasty be considered as another option on the treatment spectrum in select patient populations. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(1):13-23.].

Lateral collateral ligament deficiency of the elbow joint: A modeling approach

A computational model capable of predicting the effects of lateral collateral ligament deficiency of the elbow joint would be a valuable tool for surgical planning and prediction of the long‐term consequences of ligament deficiency. The purpose of this study was to simulate lateral collateral ligament deficiency during passive flexion using a computational multibody elbow joint model and investigate the effects of ligament insufficiency on the kinematics, ligament loads, and articular contact characteristics (area, pressure). The elbow was placed initially at approximately 20° of flexion and a 345 mm vertical downward motion profile was applied over 40 s to the humerus head. The vertical displacement induced flexion from the initial position to a maximum flexion angle of 135°. The study included simulations for intact, radial collateral ligament deficient, lateral ulnar collateral ligament deficient, and combined radial and lateral ulnar collateral ligament deficient elbow. For each condition, relative bone kinematics, contact pressure, contact area, and intact ligament forces were predicted. Intact and isolated radial collateral ligament deficient elbow simulations were almost identical for all observed outcomes. Minor differences in kinematics, contact area and pressure were observed for the isolated lateral ulnar collateral ligament deficient elbow compared to the intact elbow, but no elbow dislocation was detected. However, sectioning both ligaments together induced substantial differences in kinematics, contact area, and contact pressure, and caused complete dislocation of the elbow joint.

The annular ligament—revisited

BACKGROUND Studies investigating the annular ligament have presented confusing information about its anatomy and nomenclature. Cadaver elbow dissections were used to clarify the anatomy and terminology of the annular ligament. METHODS Nineteen elbows were dissected (7 fresh frozen and 12 embalmed). Target structures were identified, photographed, and measured by independent observers. RESULTS There are 3 layers to the lateral elbow ligaments: the superficial lateral ulnar collateral and radial collateral ligament; a deeper layer of the superior oblique band (SOB) and inferior oblique band (IOB) of the annular ligament; and the deepest capsular layer. The annular ligament measured 9.5 ± 1.4 mm anteriorly. The SOB (15/19) was 3.9 ± 1.0 mm wide by 10.5 ± 3.8 mm long. The IOB (13/19) was 3.6 ± 1.1 mm wide by 11.4 ± 4.2 mm long. The IOB inserts onto the anterior proximal ulna rather than the supinator crest. The anterior oblique band (8/19) was 3.8 ± 1.7 mm wide. CONCLUSION The SOB and IOB were present in the majority of specimens. The previously described accessory lateral collateral ligament is a localized thickening on the lateral ligament complex arising from the supinator insertion independent of the IOB that attaches to the annular ligament inferiorly and distally and attaches onto the proximal anterior ulna at the bicipital fossa floor, medial to the supinator crest.

Long-term outcome of custom triflange outrigger ulnar component in revision total elbow arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Patients missing the distal humeral condyles are prone to premature bushing wear after total elbow arthroplasty. A midterm study has demonstrated that a custom triflange outrigger ulnar component was successful in preventing this. The aim of this study was to determine whether these results remained stable over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS The outcomes of 6 patients who underwent revision of a loose ulnar component using a custom triflange outrigger component were reviewed in this retrospective case study. The average patient age at the time of revision was 51. The average number of prior operations was 2 (range, 1-3). The mean follow-up was 15 years (range, 10-18 years). RESULTS At final follow-up, the mean range of extension-flexion was 35° to 135°, and pronation-supination was 65° to 63°. The average Mayo Elbow Performance Score improved to 75 of 100. Four implants were still in place with no radiolucencies or osteolysis. Three patients required revision surgery for broken humeral stems. Two required conversion to another total elbow arthroplasty system after 18 and 14 years for humeral component loosening. CONCLUSIONS These components lasted an average of 4 times longer than the original ulnar components. In our experience, periarticular osteolysis caused by polyethylene wear creates a region of unsupported stem and a stress riser at the junction with the remaining well-supported stem and causes component stem fractures. The concept of an outrigger type of hinge might be useful for active patients requiring an elbow prosthesis in the setting of deficient condyles.

Medial Collateral Ligament Deficiency of the Elbow Joint: A Computational Approach

Computational elbow joint models, capable of simulating medial collateral ligament deficiency, can be extremely valuable tools for surgical planning and refinement of therapeutic strategies. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of varying levels of medial collateral ligament deficiency on elbow joint stability using subject-specific computational models. Two elbow joint models were placed at the pronated forearm position and passively flexed by applying a vertical downward motion on humeral head. The models included three-dimensional bone geometries, multiple ligament bundles wrapped around the joint, and the discretized cartilage representation. Four different ligament conditions were simulated: All intact ligaments, isolated medial collateral ligament (MCL) anterior bundle deficiency, isolated MCL posterior bundle deficiency, and complete MCL deficiency. Minimal kinematic differences were observed for isolated anterior and posterior bundle deficient elbows. However, sectioning the entire MCL resulted in significant kinematic differences and induced substantial elbow instability. Joint contact areas were nearly similar for the intact and isolated posterior bundle deficiency. Minor differences were observed for the isolated anterior bundle deficiency, and major differences were observed for the entire MCL deficiency. Complete elbow dislocations were not observed for any ligament deficiency level. As expected, during isolated anterior bundle deficiency, the remaining posterior bundle experiences higher load and vice versa. Overall, the results indicate that either MCL anterior or posterior bundle can provide anterior elbow stability, but the anterior bundle has a somewhat bigger influence on joint kinematics and contact characteristics than posterior one. A study with a larger sample size could help to strengthen the conclusion and statistical significant.

Musculoskeletal Model Development of the Elbow Joint with an Experimental Evaluation

A dynamic musculoskeletal model of the elbow joint in which muscle, ligament, and articular surface contact forces are predicted concurrently would be an ideal tool for patient-specific preoperative planning, computer-aided surgery, and rehabilitation. Existing musculoskeletal elbow joint models have limited clinical applicability because of idealizing the elbow as a mechanical hinge joint or ignoring important soft tissue (e.g., cartilage) contributions. The purpose of this study was to develop a subject-specific anatomically correct musculoskeletal elbow joint model and evaluate it based on experimental kinematics and muscle electromyography measurements. The model included three-dimensional bone geometries, a joint constrained by multiple ligament bundles, deformable contacts, and the natural oblique wrapping of ligaments. The musculoskeletal model predicted the bone kinematics reasonably accurately in three different velocity conditions. The model predicted timing and number of muscle excitations, and the normalized muscle forces were also in agreement with the experiment. The model was able to predict important in vivo parameters that are not possible to measure experimentally, such as muscle and ligament forces, and cartilage contact pressure. In addition, the developed musculoskeletal model was computationally efficient for body-level dynamic simulation. The maximum computation time was less than 30 min for our 35 s simulation. As a predictive clinical tool, the potential medical applications for this model and modeling approach are significant.