Akinori Takagane

S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial

BACKGROUND Phase I/II clinical trials of S-1 plus cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer have yielded good responses and the treatment was well tolerated. In this S-1 Plus cisplatin versus S-1 In RCT In the Treatment for Stomach cancer (SPIRITS) trial, we aimed to verify that overall survival was better in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with S-1 plus cisplatin than with S-1 alone. METHODS In this phase III trial, chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled between March 26, 2002, and Nov 30, 2004, at 38 centres in Japan, and randomly assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin or S-1 alone. In patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin, S-1 (40-60 mg depending on patients body surface area) was given orally, twice daily for 3 consecutive weeks, and 60 mg/m(2) cisplatin was given intravenously on day 8, followed by a 2-week rest period, within a 5-week cycle. Those assigned to S-1 alone received the same dose of S-1 twice daily for 4 consecutive weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period, within a 6-week cycle. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, proportions of responders, and safety. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00150670. FINDINGS 305 patients were enrolled; seven patients were ineligible or withdrew consent, therefore, 148 patients were assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin and 150 patients were assigned to S-1 alone. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin (13.0 months [IQR 7.6-21.9]) than in those assigned to S-1 alone (11.0 months [5.6-19.8]; hazard ratio for death, 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.98; p=0.04). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin than in those assigned to S-1 alone (median progression-free survival 6.0 months [3.3-12.9] vs 4.0 months [2.1-6.8]; p<0.0001). Additionally, of 87 patients assigned S-1 plus cisplatin who had target tumours, one patient had a complete response and 46 patients had partial responses, ie, a total of 54% (range 43-65). Of 106 patients assigned S-1 alone who had target tumours, one patient had a complete response and 32 had partial responses, ie, a total of 31% (23-41). We recorded more grade 3 or 4 adverse events including leucopenia, neutropenia, anaemia, nausea, and anorexia, in the group assigned to S-1 plus cisplatin than in the group assigned to S-1 alone. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. INTERPRETATION S-1 plus cisplatin holds promise of becoming a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Sentinel Node Mapping for Gastric Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Trial in Japan

PURPOSE Complicated gastric lymphatic drainage potentially undermines the utility of sentinel node (SN) biopsy in patients with gastric cancer. Encouraged by several favorable single-institution reports, we conducted a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study of SN mapping that used a standardized dual tracer endoscopic injection technique. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with previously untreated cT1 or cT2 gastric adenocarcinomas < 4 cm in gross diameter were eligible for inclusion in this study. SN mapping was performed by using a standardized dual tracer endoscopic injection technique. Following biopsy of the identified SNs, mandatory comprehensive D2 or modified D2 gastrectomy was performed according to current Japanese Gastric Cancer Association guidelines. RESULTS Among 433 patients who gave preoperative consent, 397 were deemed eligible on the basis of surgical findings. SN biopsy was performed in all patients, and the SN detection rate was 97.5% (387 of 397). Of 57 patients with lymph node metastasis by conventional hematoxylin and eosin staining, 93% (53 of 57) had positive SNs, and the accuracy of nodal evaluation for metastasis was 99% (383 of 387). Only four false-negative SN biopsies were observed, and pathologic analysis revealed that three of those biopsies were pT2 or tumors > 4 cm. We observed no serious adverse effects related to endoscopic tracer injection or the SN mapping procedure. CONCLUSION The endoscopic dual tracer method for SN biopsy was confirmed as safe and effective when applied to the superficial, relatively small gastric adenocarcinomas included in this study.

Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor (REGATTA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND Chemotherapy is the standard of care for incurable advanced gastric cancer. Whether the addition of gastrectomy to chemotherapy improves survival for patients with advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the superiority of gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone with respect to overall survival in these patients. METHODS We did an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at 44 centres or hospitals in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore. Patients aged 20-75 years with advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor confined to either the liver (H1), peritoneum (P1), or para-aortic lymph nodes (16a1/b2) were randomly assigned (1:1) in each country to chemotherapy alone or gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy by a minimisation method with biased-coin assignment to balance the groups according to institution, clinical nodal status, and non-curable factor. Patients, treating physicians, and individuals who assessed outcomes and analysed data were not masked to treatment assignment. Chemotherapy consisted of oral S-1 80 mg/m(2) per day on days 1-21 and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) on day 8 of every 5-week cycle. Gastrectomy was restricted to D1 lymphadenectomy without any resection of metastatic lesions. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with UMIN-CTR, number UMIN000001012. FINDINGS Between Feb 4, 2008, and Sept 17, 2013, 175 patients were randomly assigned to chemotherapy alone (86 patients) or gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy (89 patients). After the first interim analysis on Sept 14, 2013, the predictive probability of overall survival being significantly higher in the gastrectomy plus chemotherapy group than in the chemotherapy alone group at the final analysis was only 13·2%, so the study was closed on the basis of futility. Overall survival at 2 years for all randomly assigned patients was 31·7% (95% CI 21·7-42·2) for patients assigned to chemotherapy alone compared with 25·1% (16·2-34·9) for those assigned to gastrectomy plus chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 16·6 months (95% CI 13·7-19·8) for patients assigned to chemotherapy alone and 14·3 months (11·8-16·3) for those assigned to gastrectomy plus chemotherapy (hazard ratio 1·09, 95% CI 0·78-1·52; one-sided p=0·70). The incidence of the following grade 3 or 4 chemotherapy-associated adverse events was higher in patients assigned to gastrectomy plus chemotherapy than in those assigned to chemotherapy alone: leucopenia (14 patients [18%] vs two [3%]), anorexia (22 [29%] vs nine [12%]), nausea (11 [15%] vs four [5%]), and hyponatraemia (seven [9%] vs four [5%]). One treatment-related death occurred in a patient assigned to chemotherapy alone (sudden cardiopulmonary arrest of unknown cause during the second cycle of chemotherapy) and one occurred in a patient assigned to chemotherapy plus gastrectomy (rapid growth of peritoneal metastasis after discharge 12 days after surgery). INTERPRETATION Since gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy did not show any survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor, gastrectomy cannot be justified for treatment of patients with these tumours. FUNDING The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and the Korean Gastric Cancer Association.

A Phase III Study of Laparoscopy-assisted Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy with Nodal Dissection for Clinical Stage IA/IB Gastric Cancer (JCOG0912)

A Phase III study was started in Japan to evaluate the non-inferiority of overall survival of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy in patients with clinical IA (T1N0) or IB [T1N1 or T2(MP)N0] gastric cancer. This study followed the previous Phase II study to confirm the safety of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (JCOG0703) and began in March 2010. A total of 920 patients will be accrued from 33 institutions within 5 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival. The secondary endpoints are relapse-free survival, proportion of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy completion, proportion of conversion to open surgery, adverse events, short-term clinical outcomes, postoperative quality of life. Only a credentialed surgeon can be responsible for both open distal gastrectomy and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy.

Evaluation of the ratio of lymph node metastasis as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer

Background. Lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer is one of the important prognostic factors. However, there is no consensus concerning the best classification for lymph node metastasis as a prognostic factor. So, to evaluate the ratio of the number of metastatic lymph nodes to the total number of dissected lymph nodes (the ratio of LN meta) as a prognostic factor, we compared the ratio of LN meta with lymph node status according to the Japan Classification of Gastric Carcinoma and the total number of metastatic lymph nodes with multivariate analysis. Methods. Between 1991 and 1997, a total of 360 patients with primary gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 or more extended lymph node dissection were included in this study. Ten kinds of prognostic factors and three types of different classifications for lymph node metastasis were analyzed by multivariate analysis using the Cox regression. Results. The average number of dissected lymph nodes and metastatic lymph nodes were 55.0 (range, 11–184) and 2.6 (range, 0–86), respectively. There were significant differences of the 5-year cumulative survival rates among each group of the ratio of LN meta (0%, 1%–9%, 10%–24%, and more than 25%). Age, tumor size, curability, and the ratio of LN meta were selected as independent prognostic factors by forward stepwise selection. The ratio of LN meta showed the highest hazard ratio by Cox regression. Conclusion. The ratio of LN meta appears to be an important prognostic factor and the best classification factor for lymph node metastasis.

S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: a randomized phase III study (ACTS-CC trial)

BACKGROUND S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine whose antitumor effects have been demonstrated in treating various gastrointestinal cancers, including metastatic colon cancer, when administered as monotherapy or in combination chemotherapy. We conducted a randomized phase III study investigating the efficacy of S-1 as adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer by evaluating its noninferiority to tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin (UFT/LV). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged 20-80 years with curatively resected stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive S-1 (80-120mg/day on days 1-28 every 42 days; four courses) or UFT/LV (UFT: 300-600mg/day and LV: 75mg/day on days 1-28 every 35 days; five courses). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years. RESULTS A total of 1518 patients (758 and 760 in the S-1 and UFT/LV group, respectively) were included in the full analysis set. The 3-year DFS rate was 75.5% and 72.5% in the S-1 and UFT/LV group, respectively. The stratified hazard ratio for DFS in the S-1 group compared with the UFT/LV group was 0.85 (95% confidence interval: 0.70-1.03), demonstrating the noninferiority of S-1 (noninferiority stratified log-rank test, P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, no significant interactions were identified between the major baseline characteristics and the treatment groups. CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy using S-1 for stage III colon cancer was confirmed to be noninferior in DFS compared with UFT/LV. S-1 could be a new treatment option as adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00660894.This phase III study, ACTS-CC, is the first study in which demonstrated the efficacy of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer by confirming its noninferiority to UFT/LV in terms of disease-free survival. S-1 could be a new treatment option as adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer.

Three independent genetic profiles based on mucin expression in early differentiated-type gastric cancers—a new concept of genetic carcinogenesis of early differentiated-type adenocarcinomas

Recent molecular studies have shown that the genetic profiles of differentiated-type adenocarcinomas of the stomach are associated with distinct cellular mucin phenotypes (gastric- intestinal- and mixed-phenotypes). Therefore, we examined whether these cellular mucin phenotypes reflect specific molecular genetic alterations, and whether the phenotypes can be used to help categorize the intramucosal neoplasias of gastric tumors. We subclassified tumors into four cellular phenotypes using immunohistochemical mucin analysis. In all, 62 early gastric carcinomas (gastric-phenotype, 13; intestinal-phenotype, 17; mixed-phenotype, 31; unclassified-phenotype, 1) were examined using a combination of polymerase chain reaction microsatellite assays and immunohistochemical analysis in order to detect chromosomal allelic losses of multiple cancer-related chromosomal loci (1p, 3p. 4p, 5q, 8p, 9p, 13p, 17p, 18q and 22q), microsatellite instability (MSI), and overexpression of the p53 protein. In addition, we analyzed the relationship between MSI status and hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation, which is thought to be a cause of high MSI status. For gastric phenotype cancers, the frequency of 3p allelic loss was higher than that of other microsatellite markers, whereas 5q allelic loss was frequently found in intestinal phenotype cancers. The genetic profile of mixed phenotype cancers is comprised of two distinct genetic types: LOH and MSI types. In the former, 5q, 3p and 18q allelic losses are seen frequently in intramucosal carcinomas. On the other hand, 17p, 1p and 9p allelic losses are associated with the development of submucosal carcinomas. MSI was observed only in mixed phenotype cancers (six of 31 mixed phenotype cancers). Overexpression of the p53 protein is common in differentiated-type gastric cancers. In addition, the MSI status of the tumor cells was correlated with the extent of hypermethylation of the hMLH1 promoter. We suggest that the cellular mucin phenotypes of the differentiated-type adenocarcinomas result from distinct genetic alterations.

Gene expression profiles in human gastric cancer: expression of maspin correlates with lymph node metastasis

To seek for a candidate gene that would regulate tumour progression and metastasis in gastric cancer, we investigated gene expression profiles by using DNA microarray. Tumour tissue and adjacent normal tissue were obtained from 21 patients with gastric cancer and then examined for their gene expression profiles by the Gene Chip® Human U95Av2 array, which includes 12 000 human genes and EST sequences. A total of 25 genes were upregulated and two genes were downregulated by at least four-fold in the tumour tissue. In a further analysis according to lymph node metastasis, the expressed levels of maspin, as well as carcinoembryonic antigen and nonspecific crossreacting antigen were significantly higher in tumours with lymph node metastasis than in those without it. Maspin expression in 85 gastric cancer patients was further investigated by using immunohistochemistry. Maspin expression was not observed in normal gastric epithelia without intestinal metaplasia. In contrast, maspin was expressed in 74 of 85 tumour tissues. There was a significant correlation between the incidence of maspin-positive tumour staining and lymph node metastasis. These results suggest that maspin has a potential role for tumour metastasis in gastric cancer.

Quantitative Measurement of Thymidylate Synthase and Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase mRNA Level in Gastric Cancer by Real-time RT-PCR

We used real‐time reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) to assay expression of the mRNA of thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in gastric cancer tissue with the objective of establishing a system to measure TS and DPD in ultra‐low‐volume samples. Nude mouse xenografts of 5 human gastric cancer cell lines and 85 clinical samples were used as the specimens in this study. Sensitivity to 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) was determined on the basis of the relative tumor proliferation rate in mice and the results of ATP assay using serum‐free cultures of the clinical samples. mRNA expression was measured in tumor tissue by real‐tune RT‐ PCR using the ABI PRISM 7700 system. The values for expression of the mRNA for TS and DPD were corrected according to the level of glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA expression. The xenografts yielded correlations between TS and DPD mRNA expression and the activity of the enzymes (TS: rs=0.700, DPD: rs=0.900), and an inverse correlation was noted between the mRNA levels and sensitivity to 5‐FU (TS: rs=‐0.900, DPD: rs=‐0.800). The clinical samples showed an inverse correlation between 5‐FU sensitivity and mRNA expression (TS: rs=‐0.518, DPD: rs=‐0.564). Sensitivity to 5‐FU was noted only in cases in which TS mRNA expression and DPD mRNA expression were both low. Real‐time RT‐PCR can provide a highly sensitive assessment of TS and DPD mRNA expression in gastric cancer, and it was useful for predicting 5‐FU sensitivity.

Prognostic significance of peritoneal minimal residual disease in gastric cancer detected by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction

A sensitive method for detecting minimal residual disease in the peritoneal cavity by quantifying carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) mRNA using real‐time quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RQ‐RT–PCR) was developed. The clinical value of the method for predicting peritoneal recurrence in patients with gastric cancer was evaluated.