Akio Miyasita

Intrinsic dreams are not produced without REM sleep mechanisms: evidence through elicitation of sleep onset REM periods

The hypothesis that there is a strict relationship between dreams and a specific rapid eye movement (REM) sleep mechanism is controversial. Many researchers have recently denied this relationship, yet none of their studies have simultaneously controlled both sleep length and depth prior to non‐REM (NREM) and REM sleep awakenings, due to the natural rigid order of the NREM–REM sleep cycle. The failure to control sleep length and depth prior to arousal has confounded interpretations of the REM‐dreams relationship. We have hypothesised that different physiological mechanisms underlie dreaming during REM and NREM sleep, based on recent findings concerning the specificity of REM sleep for cognitive function. Using the Sleep Interruption Technique, we elicited sleep onset REM periods (SOREMP) from 13 normal subjects to collect SOREMP and sleep onset NREM (NREMP) dreams without the confounds described above. Regression analyses showed that SOREMP dream occurrences were significantly related to the amount of REM sleep, while NREMP dream occurrences were related to arousals from NREM sleep. Dream properties evaluated using the Dream Property Scale showed qualitative differences between SOREMP and NREMP dream reports. These results support our hypothesis and we have concluded that although ‘dreaming’ may occur during both REM and NREM periods as previous researchers have suggested, the dreams obtained from these distinct periods differ significantly in their quantitative and qualitative aspects and are likely to be produced by different mechanisms.

DIFFERENCES IN THE TIME OR FREQUENCY OF MEALS, ALCOHOL AND CAFFEINE INGESTION, AND SMOKING FOUND BETWEEN 'MORNING' AND 'EVENING' TYPES

The present study investigated some differences between ‘morning’ and ‘evening’ types in life habits, particularly concerning meals, ingestion of caffeine and alcohol, and smoking. The Life Habits Inventory and the Japanese version of Home and Östberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire were administered to approximately 1500 students, and data on life habits of the morning types were compared with those of the evening types. Significant differences between these types were found in frequency of night meals, smoking, and ingestion of caffeine and alcohol. Although significant differences were not found for mealtimes, 34.8% of the evening types typically did not eat breakfast. These differences were discussed from viewpoint of chronopharmacology and personality.

Effects of sleep interruption on REM-NREM cycle in nocturnal human sleep

Forty-four normal male students, aged 18-23 years were studied. After adaptation and baseline night (BN), 3 or 4 consecutive nights were interrupted by a forced awakening (10-90 min) once a night (ENs). Subjects (Ss) were awakened after they had slept for the first sleep cycle plus 20 min of NREM sleep in the 2nd cycle. The REM latencies following return to sleep showed a bimodal distribution separated by 25-30 min. The ENs were divided into 2 clusters: SOREMP (sleep onset REM period) and non-SOREMP nights. After interruption, the 2nd and the 3rd REM durations increased on non-SOREMP nights compared to SOREMP nights. We plotted, separately for SOREMP and non-SOREMP nights, the fluctuation of REM episode probability (FRP) at successive points in time. We examined the correspondence of FRPs derived from the sleep-independent, the sleep-dependent, and the reset hypotheses, with FRP of intact BN. On both SOREMP and non-SOREMP nights, none of the 3 models corresponded with BN. Thus, we suggest that, for both SOREMP and non-SOREMP nights, intervening wakefulness cancels the pre-awakening REM rhythm, and a new REM rhythm starts with or without SOREMP. We discuss factors influencing the rate of SOREMP occurrence (SOREMP %), such as circadian effect, individual differences, length of interruption, and pre-awakening NREM duration.

Sleep onset REM period appearance rate is affected by REM propensity in circadian rhythm in normal nocturnal sleep

OBJECTIVE REM latency is usually 60-120 min, but under certain conditions, its latency may be less than 25 min, in which it is known as sleep onset REM period (SOREMP). In order to identify the factors responsible for the appearance of SOREMP, we used the nocturnal sleep interruption method to investigate whether REM propensity in normal nocturnal sleep, (i.e. circadian variations in REM sleep related to body temperature rhythm), could affect the rate of SOREMP appearance (SOREMP%). MATERIALS AND METHODS After two adaptation and one baseline nights, we interrupted the nocturnal sleep, either in the second or the fourth cycle (early and late conditions, respectively) of 16 subjects and compared SOREMP% at the second sleep onset between these conditions by chi(2) test. Rectal temperature was measured. RESULTS SOREMP% was found to be 58.1% in the early condition and 87.5% in the late condition - a significant difference. Body temperature dropped at the second sleep onset in both conditions but the drops did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION We concluded that SOREMP% was affected by circadian variations in REM propensity but SOREMP% and body temperature drop did not show a linear relationship. Further studies to discriminate the influence of circadian rhythm factors and slow wave sleep on SOREMP% are called for.