Alan Cottenden

Fourth international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence†‡§¶‖

P. Abrams , K.E. Andersson, L. Birder, L. Brubaker, L. Cardozo, C. Chapple, A. Cottenden, W. Davila, D. de Ridder, R. Dmochowski, M. Drake, C. DuBeau, C. Fry, P. Hanno, J. Hay Smith, S. Herschorn, G. Hosker, C. Kelleher, H. Koelbl, S. Khoury,* R. Madoff, I. Milsom, K. Moore, D. Newman, V. Nitti, C. Norton, I. Nygaard, C. Payne, A. Smith, D. Staskin, S. Tekgul, J. Thuroff, A. Tubaro, D. Vodusek, A. Wein, and J.J. Wyndaele and the Members of the Committees

Coated catheters for intermittent catheterization: smooth or sticky?

Objective To evaluate the current range of hydrophilic‐coated catheters for intermittent self‐catheterization, focusing on the adherence of the catheter to the urethral mucosa at the end of catheterization.

Sheaths for urinary incontinence: a randomized crossover trial.

Objective To evaluate the full range of self‐adhesive continence sheaths for men available in the UK and thus provide clinicians and consumers with a basis for product selection.

Continence products: Research priorities to improve the lives of people with urinary and/or fecal leakage

Although many successful treatments for incontinence exist they are not effective or suitable for all people. Inconspicuous and dependable management with continence products and devices plays a crucial part in maintaining quality of life. We aim to briefly review what is known and not known in the field of continence products and devices and set out suggested priorities for research and development. The field of continence product research encompasses techniques and designs from basic laboratory science, through to clinical trials of products and to evaluations of service delivery models. Priorities for research include determining prevalence and costs of product use, development of patient reported outcomes, and development of methods for measuring skin health and for quantifying urine/faecal leakage. Product development priorities include better washable pads for women, absorbent products for fecal incontinence and flatus filters. Clinical trials of different product categories (e.g., devices for men) are needed, as are qualitative studies of patient experiences of product use. Neurourol. Urodynam. 29:640–644, 2010.

Predicting the leakage performance of small bodyworn disposable incontinence pads using laboratory tests

An international multi-centre project (The ISO Pad Leakage Project) was conducted to study the leakage performance of large bodyworn incontinence pads for heavily incontinent users and to create international standards for measuring their absorption capacities in the laboratory. This was achieved by recruiting 13 user test centres through which over 100 incontinent subjects tested each of six different products (each in three different sizes) for a period of about a week to a common protocol. Over 10,000 used pads were collected and weighed and the severity of leakage from each of them recorded. Correlations were sought between these data and the results from some 50 technical tests performed in a total of 16 technical test centres in order to discover the impact of different technical parameters on clinical pad performance. It was found that at low urine weights (less than 50 g, say) pad shaping was the most important predictor of pad leakage performance: shaped pads leaked less. With increasing urine weight, absorption capacity and absorption time increased in importance until at 350 g of urine these two parameters and shaping were of about equal significance: shaped pads with high absorption capacity and fast absorption time leaked least. A second series of analyses identified two absorption capacity tests which produced data correlating well with the overall leakage performance of pads, considering all urine weights together. Both tests were checked for repeatability (precision within laboratories) and reproducibility (precision between laboratories) and have been written up as working draft standards.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

How well does ISO 11948-1 (the Rothwell method) for measuring the absorption capacity of incontinence pads in the laboratory correlate with clinical pad performance

The ability of ISO 11948-1 (the Rothwell method) to predict the leakage performance of disposable bodyworn pads for heavy urinary incontinence was investigated by measuring correlations between models based on clinical evaluations of 138 diapers and inserts (the two major design categories), and technical models based on their Rothwell absorption capacities and design features. Correlations were poorer than in the original 1993 study for the standard (r < or =0.87 compared with r < or =0.95), but still strong enough to help with purchasing choices. For a given Rothwell capacity, the leakage performance of diapers was far superior to inserts; for example, diapers containing 450 and 300 g of urine performed, as well as inserts containing 300 and 100 g, respectively. No evidence was found for any other design feature having a significant impact on leakage performance. The coefficient of variation for Rothwell capacity (a measure of product consistency) had significant impact on the leakage performance of diapers, but not inserts. The probability of diapers with the poorest consistency leaking exceeded that for the best by about 10 percentage points. Similarly, diapers were about 10 percentage points more likely to leak when used at night than during the day. Differences between day-time and night-time use of inserts were not studied.

A system for logging incontinence events using a simple disposable sensor.

Abstract Many elderly people entering residential or nursing care are already incontinent to some degree, relying on incontinence pads to deal with the consequences. A proportion of these people have been shown to exhibit a regular pattern in their incontinence, which opens up the possibility of mitigating the problem by instituting an individual toileting regime for the person. This can reduce their reliance on incontinence pads, both improving their quality of life, and reducing the cost of care. This paper covers the development and evaluation of a sensor for detecting incontinence events, suitable for use in this setting, and describes the design of an associated electronic logger. The devices form part of an assessment system intended to identify a pattern in incontinence where it exists, and to help with the design of the toilet regime for an individual. The requirement is that the system must reliably record incontinence events, and present the information describing them in a manner appropriate to the users of the devices, who are likely to be non-technical and non-specialist.

A pilot study to evaluate reusable absorbent body-worn products for adults with moderate/heavy urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the performance of reusable absorbent body-worn products for adults with moderate/heavy urinary incontinence, compare their performance with a group of equivalent disposable products, and establish the need for a larger statistically robust study. SETTING AND SUBJECTS Ten men and 4 women living in the community were recruited from locations throughout the United Kingdom. METHODS A randomized multiple crossover design was used in which all subjects were given the opportunity to test each product. All the products were available on the UK market in January 2001. The following tools were used in the evaluation: a product performance questionnaire and a pad leakage diary. Overall opinion was used as the primary outcome indicator. RESULTS The reusable Paddy T was the best performing product overall, outperforming the disposable products. For low leakage and good absorbency (the most important product attributes identified by the subjects), the disposable all-in-one product performed best during the day. However, the Paddy T performed best for night use. The remaining reusable products performed poorly overall. CONCLUSIONS Reusable products for moderate/heavy incontinence remain unpopular for use in isolation. Surprisingly, a product manufactured from terry toweling, a traditional material, performed relatively well. Reusables may provide a useful alternative to disposable products in certain circumstances. The results from this study do not support a more comprehensive costly study.

Disposable bedpads for incontinence: predicting their clinical leakage properties using laboratory tests.

A multi-centre project has been run to identify laboratory tests capable of predicting the leakage performance of disposable incontinence bedpads. Each of 95 subjects tested each of six products for a week in turn and reported whether or not they and/or their carers found the leakage performance of each product acceptable. In addition, carers noted the severity with which individual used bedpads had leaked so that, when they had been weighed, their leakage performance could be determined as a function of urine weight. These clinical data were compared with results from the 16 different laboratory tests used routinely for bedpad evaluation in three hospital laboratories. Each test was evaluated by seeing how well the data it yielded correlated with the clinical test data. No individual test was very successful at predicting the performance of bedpads when used as sole protection but a combination of an absorption capacity test and an absorption time test predicted the percentage of users/carers finding leakage performance acceptable, accurate to within +/- eight percentage points for all six test products. A different absorption capacity test proved most successful for bedpads used as back-up to body-worn products. It predicted the percentage of users/carers finding leakage performance acceptable, accurate to +/- five percentage points for all six products.

Improving the performance of small incontinence pads: a study of "wet comfort".

Purpose The wet comfort of small, disposable incontinence pads has been found to correlate strongly with overall acceptability. This study examined the relationship between pad properties (absorption capacity, strike‐through, and wetback) and wet comfort. Design A group of women with light incontinence were asked to report on the wet comfort of a series of experimental pads made up to the same design geometry but in different combinations of materials. Methods Three different pad variants were selected, and two experiments were conducted. Experiment 1 used a single‐blind design in which 20 testers were supplied with a random mix of the three unlabeled pad variants. All pads were saved for weighing and scored for overall performance, wet comfort, and absorbency. In experiment 2, subjects used each pad variant in turn for 1 week and at the end of each week compared that pad with the one used the previous week. Main Outcome Measures Absorption capacity, wetback, and strike‐through properties for each pad variant were measured in the laboratory setting, and wet comfort was measured by a written tool completed by participants during clinical trials. Results Data analysis from experiment 1 revealed statistically significant differences among pad variants, particularly when assessed for absorbency. Differences for wet comfort were less marked and only achieved significance when those with ratings of good or OK for wet comfort were compared with those with a score of poor. In experiment 2, no statistically significant differences were found for wet comfort. Conclusions Overall, the improvement in wet comfort achieved by a substantial increase in absorption capacity and reduction in wetback were disappointing. The relatively small sample and the design specifications of the pad may have masked differences. Cost considerations mean that more evidence is needed to justify the inclusion of more expensive materials and production stages in the manufacture of small pads.