Kathryn Getliffe

Current evidence on intermittent catheterization: sterile single-use catheters or clean reused catheters and the incidence of UTI.

PURPOSE Intermittent catheterization is a commonly prescribed procedure for people with incomplete bladder emptying not managed by other methods. The most frequent complication of intermittent catheterization is urinary tract infection (UTI). It is unclear what strategies, including sterile vs clean catheters or coated vs uncoated PVC catheters, affect the incidence of UTIs. This systematic review summarizes current evidence on the relationship between sterile single-use catheters or clean reused catheters and the incidence of UTIs. SEARCH STRATEGY The Cochrane Incontinence Group trials register, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched, plus the reference lists of relevant articles and conference proceedings. Randomized controlled trials comparing at least two different products or methods for intermittent catheterization were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Three reviewers assessed the methodological quality of trials and abstracted data. MAIN RESULTS Of the 13 trials that met the inclusion criteria on intermittent catheterization protocols, there was considerable variation in length of follow-up, definitions of UTI, and numbers of subjects. Attrition was a problem for several studies, and all were underpowered. Several studies were more than 10 years old, and outcome measures were imprecise, making it difficult to draw conclusions on the benefit of one catheterization method over another. CONCLUSIONS There are no definitive studies illustrating that incidence of UTIs is affected by sterile single-use or coated catheters compared to clean reused catheters. However the current research base is weak and design issues are significant. Based on the current data, it is not possible to state that one catheter method is better than another and further research on the topic is strongly recommended.

Study on the use of long-term urinary catheters in community-dwelling individuals.

PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and distribution of catheter-related problems in long-term indwelling urinary catheter users. We also sought to assess appropriateness of catheter use and examine relationships among catheter complications and catheter care practices. DESIGN This repeated-measures study involved self-reported data collection by recall at intake and by prospective data collection at 2, 4, and 6 months in long-term urinary catheter users. SUBJECTS AND SETTING Two sampling arms were used: a home care (HC) agency with 10 individuals and the Internet with 33 people having spinal cord injury. METHODS Home visit and follow-up telephone call interviews were used with the participants from the HC agency. Data were self-administered through SurveyMonkey in the Internet sample, and communication was through e-mail, telephone, and postal mail. Analysis included descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equation techniques to adjust for within-subject variation over time. RESULTS All study participants had at least 1 catheter-related problem during 8 months, and many had multiple, recurring problems. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) was reported by 70%, blockage by 74%, leakage by 79%, and accidental dislodgement by 33%. Key tests of associations (generalized estimating equation) predicted that catheter size contributed to CAUTI, with significant covariates of female gender and younger age. The presence of sediment in the urine on the day of the survey predicted catheter blockage. CONCLUSION The incidence of all complications was higher than expected. Problems associated with long-term indwelling catheter use may contribute to excess healthcare utilization adversely affecting both users and their families.