Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Alan G. Waxman is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Alan G. Waxman.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2012

American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer

Diane Solomon; Herschel W. Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M. Cain; Francisco Garcia; Ann T. Moriarty; Alan G. Waxman; David C. Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S. Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L. Franco; Mark H. Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E. Castle; Evan R. Myers

An update to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline regarding screening for the early detection of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer is presented. The guidelines are based on a systematic evidence review, contributions from 6 working groups, and a recent symposium cosponsored by the ACS, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, which was attended by 25 organizations. The new screening recommendations address age‐appropriate screening strategies, including the use of cytology and high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, follow‐up (eg, the management of screen positives and screening intervals for screen negatives) of women after screening, the age at which to exit screening, future considerations regarding HPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, and screening strategies for women vaccinated against HPV16 and HPV18 infections. CA Cancer J Clin 2012.


American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2012

American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Diane Solomon; Herschel W. Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M. Cain; Francisco Garcia; Ann T. Moriarty; Alan G. Waxman; David C. Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S. Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L. Franco; Mark H. Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E. Castle; Evan R. Myers

An update to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline regarding screening for the early detection of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer is presented. The guidelines are based on a systematic evidence review, contributions from 6 working groups, and a recent symposium cosponsored by the ACS, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, which was attended by 25 organizations. The new screening recommendations address age-appropriate screening strategies, including the use of cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, follow-up (eg, the management of screen positives and screening intervals for screen negatives) of women after screening, the age at which to exit screening, future considerations regarding HPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, and screening strategies for women vaccinated against HPV16 and HPV18 infections.


Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease | 2012

American cancer society, american society for colposcopy and cervical pathology, and american society for clinical pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer

Diane Solomon; Herschel W. Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M. Cain; Francisco Garcia; Ann T. Moriarty; Alan G. Waxman; David C. Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S. Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L. Franco; Mark H. Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E. Castle; Evan R. Myers

Abstract An update to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline regarding screening for the early detection of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer is presented. The guidelines are based on a systematic evidence review, contributions from six working groups, and a recent symposium co-sponsored by the ACS, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), which was attended by 25 organizations. The new screening recommendations address age-appropriate screening strategies, including the use of cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, follow-up (e.g., management of screen positives and screening interval for screen negatives) of women after screening, age at which to exit screening, future considerations regarding HPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, and screening strategies for women vaccinated against HPV16/18 infections.


Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease | 2009

The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

L. Stewart Massad; Jose Jeronimo; Hormuzd A. Katki; Mark Schiffman; Sameer K. Antani; Lori A. Boardman; Peter S. Cartwright; Philip E. Castle; Charles J. Dunton; Julia C. Gage; Richard Guido; Fernando B. Guijon; Thomas J. Herzog; Warner K. Huh; Abner P. Korn; Edward R. Kost; Ramey D. Littell; Rodney Long; Jorge Morales; Leif Neve; Dennis M. O'Connor; Janet S. Rader; George F. Sawaya; Mario Sideri; Karen Smith-McCune; Mark Spitzer; Alan G. Waxman; Claudia L. Werner

Objective. To relate aspects of online colposcopic image assessment to the diagnosis of grades 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2+). Methods: To simulate colposcopic assessment, we obtained digitized cervical images at enrollment after acetic acid application from 919 women referred for equivocal or minor cytologic abnormalities into the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. For each, 2 randomly assigned evaluators from a pool of 20 colposcopists assessed images using a standardized tool online. We calculated the accuracy of these assessments for predicting histologic CIN 2+ over the 2 years of study. For validation, a subset of online results was compared with same-day enrollment colposcopic assessments. Results. Identifying any acetowhite lesion in images yielded high sensitivity: 93% of women with CIN 2+ had at least 1 acetowhite lesion. However, 74% of women without CIN 2+ also had acetowhitening, regardless of human papillomavirus status. The sensitivity for CIN 2+ of an online colpophotographic assessment of high-grade disease was 39%. The sensitivity for CIN 2+ of a high-grade diagnosis by Reid Index scoring was 30%, and individual Reid Index component scores had similar levels of sensitivity and specificity. The performance of online assessment was not meaningfully different from that of same-day enrollment colposcopy, suggesting that these approaches have similar utility. Conclusions. Finding acetowhite lesions identifies women with CIN 2+, but using subtler colposcopic characteristics to grade lesions is insensitive. All acetowhite lesions should be assessed with biopsy to maximize sensitivity of colposcopic diagnosis with good specificity.


Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology | 2005

Guidelines for Cervical Cancer Screening: History and Scientific Rationale

Alan G. Waxman

Introduction Invasive cancer of the uterine cervix is relatively rare among American women. In 2004, the American Cancer Society estimated an incidence of 10,520 cases in the United States with about 3,900 deaths. The mortality rate from 1997 to 2001 was 2.9 per 100,000 women. By contrast, as recently as the early 1940s, the mortality from cervical cancer in New York State was over 15 per 100,000 women. Although the cited mortality rates are not precisely comparable owing to the different populations used for standardization, the decline they represent is real and quite dramatic. The reduction in cervical cancer deaths over the last half century has been attributed to the widespread implementation of cervical cytology screening with the Pap test. Although it has been estimated that over 80% of women in the United States have had a Pap test within the past 3 years, the majority of those who get squamous cell cervical cancer have not been well screened. Fifty percent of cervical cancers are diagnosed in women who have never had a Pap test; another 10% have not been screened within the past 5 years. The introduction of cervical cytology screening programs into communities in the U.S. and elsewhere in the 1950s and 1960s resulted in dramatic decreases in cervical cancer incidence and mortality. In resource-poor countries, where cytology screening is generally not available, the cervix is still the most common site of cancer death in women. Worldwide, cervical cancer is the secondmost common cancer in women and the third most frequent cause of cancer death. Resource-poor countries account for 79% of the approximately 466,000 cases Correspondence: Alan G. Waxman, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MSC 10 5580, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-0001. E-mail: [email protected]


Cancer | 2008

Regional differences in cervical cancer incidence among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 1999–2004†‡§

Thomas M. Becker; David K. Espey; Herschel W. Lawson; Mona Saraiya; Melissa A. Jim; Alan G. Waxman

Reports from limited geographic regions indicate higher rates of cervical cancer incidence in American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women than in women of other races. However, accurate determinations of cervical cancer incidence in AI/AN women have been hampered by racial misclassification in central cancer registries.


Applied Optics | 2009

In vivo light scattering for the detection of cancerous and precancerous lesions of the cervix

Tamara M. Powers; Therese Bocklage; Heather M. Greene; Maxine H. Dorin; Alan G. Waxman; Meggan M. Zsemlye; Harriet O. Smith

A noninvasive optical diagnostic system for detection of cancerous and precancerous lesions of the cervix was evaluated in vivo. The optical system included a fiber-optic probe designed to measure polarized and unpolarized light transport properties of a small volume of tissue. An algorithm for diagnosing tissue based on the optical measurements was developed that used four optical properties, three of which were related to light scattering properties and the fourth of which was related to hemoglobin concentration. A sensitivity of ~77% and specificities in the mid 60% range were obtained for separating high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and cancer from other pathologies and normal tissue. The use of different cross-validation methods in algorithm development is analyzed, and the relative difficulties of diagnosing certain pathologies are assessed. Furthermore, the robustness of the optical system for use by different doctors and to changes in fiber-optic probe are also assessed, and potential improvements in the optical system are discussed.


Annals of Internal Medicine | 2015

Inefficiencies and High-Value Improvements in U.S. Cervical Cancer Screening Practice: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Jane J. Kim; Nicole G. Campos; Stephen Sy; Emily A. Burger; Jack Cuzick; Philip E. Castle; William C. Hunt; Alan G. Waxman; Cosette M. Wheeler

BACKGROUND Studies suggest that cervical cancer screening practice in the United States is inefficient. The cost and health implications of nonadherence in the screening process compared with recommended guidelines are uncertain. OBJECTIVE To estimate the benefits, costs, and cost-effectiveness of current cervical cancer screening practice and assess the value of screening improvements. DESIGN Model-based cost-effectiveness analysis. DATA SOURCES New Mexico HPV Pap Registry; medical literature. TARGET POPULATION Cohort of women eligible for routine screening. TIME HORIZON Lifetime. PERSPECTIVE Societal. INTERVENTION Current cervical cancer screening practice; improved adherence to guidelines-based screening interval, triage testing, diagnostic referrals, and precancer treatment referrals. OUTCOME MEASURES Reductions in lifetime cervical cancer risk, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), lifetime costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and incremental net monetary benefits (INMBs). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS Current screening practice was associated with lower health benefit and was not cost-effective relative to guidelines-based strategies. Improvements in the screening process were associated with higher QALYs and small changes in costs. Perfect adherence to screening every 3 years with cytologic testing and adherence to colposcopy/biopsy referrals were associated with the highest INMBs (


Medical Clinics of North America | 2015

Cervical cancer prevention: immunization and screening 2015.

Lauren Thaxton; Alan G. Waxman

759 and


International Journal of Cancer | 2015

Human papillomavirus testing 2007–2012: Co-testing and triage utilization and impact on subsequent clinical management

Jack Cuzick; Orrin B. Myers; William C. Hunt; Philip E. Castle; Walter Kinney; Alan G. Waxman; Michael Robertson; Cosette M. Wheeler

741, respectively, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of

Collaboration


Dive into the Alan G. Waxman's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Schiffman

United States Department of Health and Human Services

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicolas Wentzensen

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

David Chelmow

Virginia Commonwealth University

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

L. Stewart Massad

Washington University in St. Louis

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Herschel W. Lawson

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Philip E. Castle

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Warner K. Huh

University of Alabama at Birmingham

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge