Network


Latest external collaboration on country level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots.

Hotspot


Dive into the research topics where Herschel W. Lawson is active.

Publication


Featured researches published by Herschel W. Lawson.


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2012

American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer

Diane Solomon; Herschel W. Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M. Cain; Francisco Garcia; Ann T. Moriarty; Alan G. Waxman; David C. Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S. Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L. Franco; Mark H. Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E. Castle; Evan R. Myers

An update to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline regarding screening for the early detection of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer is presented. The guidelines are based on a systematic evidence review, contributions from 6 working groups, and a recent symposium cosponsored by the ACS, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, which was attended by 25 organizations. The new screening recommendations address age‐appropriate screening strategies, including the use of cytology and high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, follow‐up (eg, the management of screen positives and screening intervals for screen negatives) of women after screening, the age at which to exit screening, future considerations regarding HPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, and screening strategies for women vaccinated against HPV16 and HPV18 infections. CA Cancer J Clin 2012.


American Journal of Clinical Pathology | 2012

American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Diane Solomon; Herschel W. Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M. Cain; Francisco Garcia; Ann T. Moriarty; Alan G. Waxman; David C. Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S. Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L. Franco; Mark H. Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E. Castle; Evan R. Myers

An update to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline regarding screening for the early detection of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer is presented. The guidelines are based on a systematic evidence review, contributions from 6 working groups, and a recent symposium cosponsored by the ACS, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, which was attended by 25 organizations. The new screening recommendations address age-appropriate screening strategies, including the use of cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, follow-up (eg, the management of screen positives and screening intervals for screen negatives) of women after screening, the age at which to exit screening, future considerations regarding HPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, and screening strategies for women vaccinated against HPV16 and HPV18 infections.


The New England Journal of Medicine | 2000

Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction and 30-Day Mortality among Women and Men

Sandra C. Gan; Shelli K. Beaver; Peter M. Houck; Richard F. MacLehose; Herschel W. Lawson; Leighton Chan

BACKGROUND Previous studies have suggested that women with acute myocardial infarction receive less aggressive therapy than men. We used data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project to determine whether women and men who were ideal candidates for therapy after acute myocardial infarction were treated differently. METHODS Information was abstracted from the charts of 138,956 Medicare beneficiaries (49 percent of them women) who had an acute myocardial infarction in 1994 or 1995. Multivariate analysis was used to assess differences between women and men in the medications administered, the procedures used, the assignment of do-not-resuscitate status, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS Among ideal candidates for therapy, women in all age groups were less likely to undergo diagnostic catheterization than men. The difference was especially pronounced among older women; for a woman 85 years of age or older, the adjusted relative risk was 0.75 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.83). Women were somewhat less likely than men to receive thrombolytic therapy within 60 minutes (adjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.90 to 0.96) or to receive aspirin within 24 hours after arrival at the hospital (adjusted relative risk, 0.96; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.95 to 0.97), but they were equally likely to receive beta-blockers (adjusted relative risk, 0.99; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.95 to 1.03) and somewhat more likely to receive angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (adjusted relative risk, 1.05; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.08). Women were more likely than men to have a do-not-resuscitate order in their records (adjusted relative risk, 1.26; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.22 to 1.29). After adjustment, women and men had similar 30-day mortality rates (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.04). CONCLUSIONS As compared with men, women receive somewhat less aggressive treatment during the early management of acute myocardial infarction. However, many of these differences are small, and there is no apparent effect on early mortality.


Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease | 2013

2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors.

Massad Ls; Mark H. Einstein; Warner K. Huh; Hormuzd A. Katki; Walter Kinney; Mark Schiffman; Diane Solomon; Nicolas Wentzensen; Herschel W. Lawson

ABSTRACT A group of 47 experts representing 23 professional societies, national and international health organizations, and federal agencies met in Bethesda, MD, September 14–15, 2012, to revise the 2006 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Consensus Guidelines. The group’s goal was to provide revised evidence-based consensus guidelines for managing women with abnormal cervical cancer screening tests, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) following adoption of cervical cancer screening guidelines incorporating longer screening intervals and co-testing. In addition to literature review, data from almost 1.4 million women in the Kaiser Permanente Northern California Medical Care Plan provided evidence on risk after abnormal tests. Where data were available, guidelines prescribed similar management for women with similar risks for CIN 3, AIS, and cancer. Most prior guidelines were reaffirmed. Examples of updates include: Human papillomavirus–negative atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance results are followed with co-testing at 3 years before return to routine screening and are not sufficient for exiting women from screening at age 65 years; women aged 21–24 years need less invasive management, especially for minor abnormalities; postcolposcopy management strategies incorporate co-testing; endocervical sampling reported as CIN 1 should be managed as CIN 1; unsatisfactory cytology should be repeated in most circumstances, even when HPV results from co-testing are known, while most cases of negative cytology with absent or insufficient endocervical cells or transformation zone component can be managed without intensive follow-up.


Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease | 2012

American cancer society, american society for colposcopy and cervical pathology, and american society for clinical pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer

Diane Solomon; Herschel W. Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna M. Cain; Francisco Garcia; Ann T. Moriarty; Alan G. Waxman; David C. Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S. Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L. Franco; Mark H. Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E. Castle; Evan R. Myers

Abstract An update to the American Cancer Society (ACS) guideline regarding screening for the early detection of cervical precancerous lesions and cancer is presented. The guidelines are based on a systematic evidence review, contributions from six working groups, and a recent symposium co-sponsored by the ACS, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), and American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), which was attended by 25 organizations. The new screening recommendations address age-appropriate screening strategies, including the use of cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, follow-up (e.g., management of screen positives and screening interval for screen negatives) of women after screening, age at which to exit screening, future considerations regarding HPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, and screening strategies for women vaccinated against HPV16/18 infections.


Gynecologic Oncology | 2015

Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: Interim clinical guidance

Warner K. Huh; Kevin A. Ault; David Chelmow; Diane D. Davey; Robert A. Goulart; Francisco Garcia; Walter Kinney; L. Stewart Massad; Edward J. Mayeaux; Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Herschel W. Lawson; Mark H. Einstein

In 2011, the American Cancer Society, the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology updated screening guidelines for the early detection of cervical cancer and its precursors. Recommended screening strategies were cytology and cotesting (cytology in combination with hrHPV testing). These guidelines also addressed the use of hrHPV testing alone as a primary screening approach, which was not recommended for use at that time. There is now a growing body of evidence for screening with primary hrHPV testing, including a prospective US-based registration study. Thirteen experts including representatives from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Cancer Society, American Society of Cytopathology, College of American Pathologists, and the American Society for Clinical Pathology, convened to provide interim guidance for primary hrHPV screening. This guidance panel was specifically triggered by an application to the FDA for a currently marketed HPV test to be labeled for the additional indication of primary cervical cancer screening. Guidance was based on literature review and review of data from the FDA registration study, supplemented by expert opinion. This document aims to provide information for healthcare providers who are interested in primary hrHPV testing and an overview of the potential advantages and disadvantages of this strategy for screening as well as to highlight areas in need of further investigation.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1993

The epidemiology of placenta previa in the United States, 1979 through 1987

Solomon Iyasu; Audrey K. Saftlas; Diane L. Rowley; Lisa M. Koonin; Herschel W. Lawson; Hani K. Atrash

OBJECTIVE Placenta previa can cause serious, occasionally fatal complications for fetuses and mothers; however, data on its national incidence and sociodemographic risk factors have not been available. STUDY DESIGN We analyzed data from the National Hospital Discharge Survey for the years 1979 through 1987 and from the Retrospective Maternal Mortality Study (1979 through 1986). RESULTS We found that placenta previa complicated 4.8 per 1000 deliveries annually and was fatal in 0.03% of cases. Incidence rates remained stable among white women but increased among black and other minority women (p < 0.1). In addition, the risk of placenta previa was higher for black and other minority women than for white women (rate ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 1.7), and it was higher for women > or = 35 years old than for women <20 years old (rate ratio 4.7, 95% confidence interval 3.3 to 7.0). Women with placenta previa were at an increased risk of abruptio placentae (rate ratio 13.8), cesarean delivery (rate ratio 3.9), fetal malpresentation (rate ratio 2.8), and postpartum hemorrhage (rate ratio 1.7). CONCLUSION Our findings support the need for improved prenatal and intrapartum care to reduce the serious complications and deaths associated with placenta previa.


American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology | 1995

Homicide and other injuries as causes of maternal death in New York City, 1987 through 1991

Andrew L. Dannenberg; Debra Carter; Herschel W. Lawson; Diane M. Ashton; Sally Faith Dorfman; Elizabeth H. Graham

OBJECTIVES We attempted to document the role of homicide and other injuries as causes of maternal death and to compare the risk of fatal injury among pregnant women with that in the general population. STUDY DESIGN We reviewed New York City medical examiner records of 2331 women aged 15 to 44 years who died of injury in 1987 through 1991. Pregnancies were identified from autopsy information. RESULTS A total of 115 (39%) of 293 deaths in currently or recently pregnant women were attributable to injury. These 115 deaths included homicide (63%), suicide (13%), motor vehicle crashes (12%), and drug overdoses (7%). Minority women were overrepresented among the injury deaths (black 53%, Hispanic 24%, white 19%). Recent substance use was documented in 48% of the injury deaths. Pregnancy was documented on only 35% of the 115 death certificates. The risk of fatal injury is similar for currently pregnant women and for women in the general population, except for an increased risk of homicide among pregnant black women. CONCLUSIONS Homicide and other injuries are major contributors to maternal mortality and should be (but rarely are) included routinely in maternal mortality surveillance systems. Prenatal and postpartum clinic visits represent an ideal time to implement interventions to prevent injuries among pregnant women.


Obstetrics & Gynecology | 2007

Cervical cancer incidence in a prevaccine era in the United States, 1998-2002.

Mona Saraiya; Faruque Ahmed; Sheila Krishnan; Thomas B. Richards; Elizabeth R. Unger; Herschel W. Lawson

OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence of cervical cancer by geography, race or ethnicity, and histology. METHODS: We examined combined data from the National Program of Cancer Registries and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program covering 87% of the U.S. population. We calculated the age-adjusted incidence of cervical cancer by age, race or ethnicity, histology, and stage by region or state. RESULTS: Rates of invasive cancer per 100,000 females declined from 10.2 in 1998 to 8.5 in 2002. Incidence rates by state ranged from 6.6 to 12.3 per 100,000. Rates were especially high among Hispanic women aged 40 years or older (26.5 or more) and African-American women aged older than 50 years (23.5 or more). Rates of squamous cell carcinoma were significantly higher among African-American and Hispanic women than among their white counterparts. In contrast, rates of adenocarcinoma (18% of all cases) were significantly lower among African-American women than in white women (rate ratio 0.88, P<.05). Rates of adenocarcinoma were significantly higher among Hispanic women than among non-Hispanics (rate ratio 1.71, P<.05). Although no regional differences were noted for adenocarcinoma, rates of squamous cell carcinoma were higher in the South than in other regions. CONCLUSION: Despite intense screening in the past decade, higher rates of cervical cancer persist among women in the South and women who are African American or Hispanic. This information could guide more focused interventions to increase access to screening with cervical cytology as well as vaccination against human papillomavirus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III


CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | 2004

Clinical Breast Examination: Practical Recommendations for Optimizing Performance and Reporting

Judy Hannan; Janet Osuch; Marianne H. Alciati; Cornelia J. Baines; Mary B. Barton; Janet Kay Bobo; Cathy Coleman; Mary Dolan; Ginny Gaumer; Daniel B. Kopans; Susan E. Kutner; Dorothy S. Lane; Herschel W. Lawson; Helen I. Meissner; Candace Moorman; H. S. Pennypacker; Peggy Pierce; Eva Sciandra; Robert A. Smith; Ralph J. Coates

Clinical breast examination (CBE) seeks to detect breast abnormalities or evaluate patient reports of symptoms to find palpable breast cancers at an earlier stage of progression. Treatment options for earlier‐stage cancers are generally more numerous, include less toxic alternatives, and are usually more effective than treatments for later‐stage cancers. For average‐risk women aged 40 and younger, earlier detection of palpable tumors identified by CBE can lead to earlier therapy. After age 40, when mammography is recommended, CBE is regarded as an adjunct to mammography. Recent debate, however, has questioned the contributions of CBE to the detection of breast cancer in asymptomatic women and particularly to improved survival and reduced mortality rates. Clinicians remain widely divided about the level of evidence supporting CBE and their confidence in the examination. Yet, CBE is practiced extensively in the United States and continues to be recommended by many leading health organizations. It is in this context that this report provides a brief review of evidence for CBEs role in the earlier detection of breast cancer, highlights current practice issues, and presents recommendations that, when implemented, could contribute to greater standardization of the practice and reporting of CBE. These recommendations may also lead to improved evidence of the nature and extent of CBEs contribution to the earlier detection of breast cancer.

Collaboration


Dive into the Herschel W. Lawson's collaboration.

Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mona Saraiya

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Hani K. Atrash

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nancy C. Lee

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Vicki B. Benard

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Alan G. Waxman

University of New Mexico

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Mark Schiffman

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Nicolas Wentzensen

National Institutes of Health

View shared research outputs
Top Co-Authors

Avatar

Christie R. Eheman

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

View shared research outputs
Researchain Logo
Decentralizing Knowledge