Alasdair Conn

Prospective Study of Blunt Aortic Injury: Multicenter Trial of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

BACKGROUND Blunt aortic injury is a major cause of death from blunt trauma. Evolution of diagnostic techniques and methods of operative repair have altered the management and posed new questions in recent years. METHODS This study was a prospectively conducted multi-center trial involving 50 trauma centers in North America under the direction of the Multi-institutional Trial Committee of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. RESULTS There were 274 blunt aortic injury cases studied over 2.5 years, of which 81% were caused by automobile crashes. Chest computed tomography and transesophageal echocardiography were applied in 88 and 30 cases, respectively, and were 75 and 80% diagnostic, respectively. Two hundred seven stable patients underwent planned thoracotomy and repair. Clamp and sew technique was used in 73 (35%) and bypass techniques in 134 (65%). Overall mortality was 31%, with 63% of deaths being attributable to aortic rupture; mortality was not affected by method of repair. Paraplegia occurred postoperatively in 8.7%. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated clamp and sew (p = 0.002) and aortic cross clamp time of > or = 30 minutes (p = 0.01) to be associated with development of postoperative paraplegia. CONCLUSIONS Rupture after hospital admission remains a major problem. Although newer diagnostic techniques are being applied, at this time aortography remains the diagnostic standard. Aortic cross clamp time beyond 30 minutes was associated with paraplegia; bypass techniques, which provide distal aortic perfusion, produced significantly lower paraplegia rates than the clamp and sew approach.

Benchmarking and quality improvement: the Harvard Emergency Department Quality Study ∗

PURPOSE To determine whether feedback of comparative information was associated with improvement in medical record and patient-based measures of quality in emergency departments. SUBJECTS AND METHODS During 1-month study periods in 1993 and 1995, all medical records for patients who presented to five Harvard teaching hospital emergency departments with one of six selected chief complaints (abdominal pain, shortness of breath, chest pain, hand laceration, head trauma, or vaginal bleeding) were reviewed for the percent compliance with process-of-care guidelines. Patient-reported problems and patient ratings of satisfaction with emergency department care were collected from eligible patients using patient questionnaires. After reviewing benchmark information, emergency department directors designed quality improvement interventions to improve compliance with the process-of-care guidelines and improve patient-reported quality measures. RESULTS In the preintervention period, 4,876 medical records were reviewed (99% of those eligible), 2,327 patients completed on-site questionnaires (84% of those eligible), and 1,386 patients completed 10-day follow-up questionnaires (80% of a random sample of eligible participants). In the postintervention period, 6,005 medical records were reviewed (99% of those eligible), 2,899 patients completed on-site questionnaires (84% of those eligible), and 2,326 patients completed 10-day follow-up questionnaires (80% of all baseline participants). In multivariate analyses, adjusting for age, urgency, chief complaint, and site, compliance with process-of-care guidelines increased from 55.9% (preintervention) to 60.4% (postintervention, P = 0.0001). We also found a 4% decrease (from 24% to 20%) in the rate of patient-reported problems with emergency department care (P = 0.0001). There were no significant improvements in patient ratings of satisfaction. CONCLUSION Feedback of benchmark information and subsequent quality improvement efforts led to small, although significant, improvement in compliance with process-of-care guidelines and patient-reported measures of quality. The measures that relied on patient reports of problems with care, rather than patient ratings of satisfaction with care, seemed to be more responsive to change. These results support the value of benchmarking and collaboration.

EMS Agenda for the Future: Where We Are … Where We Want to Be

During the past 30 years, emergency medical services (EMS) in the United States have experienced explosive growth. The American health care system is now transforming, providing an opportune time to examine what we have learned over the past three decades in order to create a vision for the future of EMS. Over the course of several months, a multidisciplinary steering committee collaborated with hundreds of EMS-interested individuals, organizations, and agencies to develop the EMS Agenda for the Future. Fourteen EMS attributes were identified as requiring continued development in order to realize the vision established within the Agenda. They are integration of health services, EMS research, legislation and regulation, system finance, human resources, medical direction, education systems, public education, prevention, public access, communication systems, clinical care, information systems, and evaluation. Discussion of these attributes provides important guidance for achieving a vision for the future of EMS that emphasizes its critical role in American health care.

Plain abdominal radiography in clinically suspected appendicitis : Diagnostic yield, resource use, and comparison with CT

This study determined the diagnostic utility and hospital resource impact of plain abdominal radiography in emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. The authors reviewed medical records of 821 consecutive patients hospitalized for suspected appendicitis; 78% had plain abdominal radiography. Sixty-four percent had appendicitis. Radiographic findings were noted in 51% of patients with, and 47% of patients without appendicitis; no individual radiographic finding was sensitive or specific. Specific conditions were suggested in 10% of impressions; these failed to correlate with final clinical diagnoses 57% of the time. Hospital cost per abdominal radiograph was

Acute traumatic disruption of the thoracic aorta: Emergency department management

67; cost per specific, correct radiographic diagnosis was

Traumatic Hemipelvectomy: Report of Two Survivors and Review

1,593. This is compared with

Hartford Consensus: A Call to Action for THREAT, a Medical Disaster Preparedness Concept

270 per appendiceal computed tomography scan (based on recent literature data). The authors conclude that plain abdominal radiographs in patients with suspected appendicitis are neither sensitive nor specific, are frequently misleading, are costly per specific and correct diagnosis, and should not be routinely obtained on patients with suspected appendicitis.

Das amerikanische Notfallwesen – “emergency medical service” und “emergency room”

STUDY OBJECTIVE To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of temporary IV antihypertensive therapy in patients with acute traumatic thoracic aortic disruption. DESIGN Retrospective chart review of all patients treated for proven traumatic aortic disruption during the ten-year period of 1980 through 1989. SETTING Emergency department of a large, urban, Level I trauma center. INTERVENTIONS Preoperative IV beta-blockade and nitroprusside after initial resuscitation in hemodynamically stable patients. RESULTS Thirty-seven patients with angiographically proven aortic disruption were separated retrospectively into one of three groups. Group 1 (15 patients without preoperative antihypertensive therapy) had two deaths. Group 2 (15 patients treated for two to seven hours [mean, 3.8 hours] before surgery with antihypertensives) had one death. Group 3 (seven patients treated with antihypertensives for 24 hours to four months before surgery to allow recovery from associated severe injuries) had one death. There were no complications resulting from antihypertensive therapy. CONCLUSION Temporary antihypertensive therapy appears to be safe and effective in patients with aortic disruption.

Marathon day at Massachusetts General.

Two surviving patients with traumatic hemipelvectomy are presented. Rapid transport, aggressive initial resuscitation, and attention to detail in the rehabilitation phase are necessary for the successful management of these patients. The viability of the psoas muscle should be assessed, because of the high possibility of avulsion. Associated nerve injury and complicating meningitis can be serious problems in the management of such patients. There is need to include this entity in the existing classifications of pelvic fractures. Hemipelvectomy is proposed as an alternative in the management of the severe unilateral open pelvic fracture with uncontrollable bleeding.

Improving the incomplete infrastructure for interhospital patient transfer.

Received October 23, 2013; Revised December 9, 20 December 10, 2013. From Hartford Hospital, University of Connecticut, Hartfor Burns); Federal Bureau of Investigation (Wade, Fabbri) and t on Tactical Combat Casualty Care, Department of Defense, System (Butler), Washington, DC; Tulane University Depa gery, New Orleans, LA (McSwain); Dallas Police Departme western Medical Center, Dallas, TX (Eastman); and Massach Hospital, Boston, MA (Conn). Correspondence address: Lenworth M Jacobs, MD, MPH, F Hospital, 80 Seymour St, Hartford, CT 06102. email: len hhchealth.org