Laurie Petrovick

Clinical clearance of the cervical spine in blunt trauma patients younger than 3 years: A multi-center study of the american association for the surgery of trauma

BACKGROUND Cervical spine clearance in the very young child is challenging. Radiographic imaging to diagnose cervical spine injuries (CSI) even in the absence of clinical findings is common, raising concerns about radiation exposure and imaging-related complications. We examined whether simple clinical criteria can be used to safely rule out CSI in patients younger than 3 years. METHODS The trauma registries from 22 level I or II trauma centers were reviewed for the 10-year period (January 1995 to January 2005). Blunt trauma patients younger than 3 years were identified. The measured outcome was CSI. Independent predictors of CSI were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis. A weighted score was calculated by assigning 1, 2, or 3 points to each independent predictor according to its magnitude of effect. The score was established on two thirds of the population and validated using the remaining one third. RESULTS Of 12,537 patients younger than 3 years, CSI was identified in 83 patients (0.66%), eight had spinal cord injury. Four independent predictors of CSI were identified: Glasgow Coma Score <14, GCSEYE = 1, motor vehicle crash, and age 2 years or older. A score of <2 had a negative predictive value of 99.93% in ruling out CSI. A total of 8,707 patients (69.5% of all patients) had a score of <2 and were eligible for cervical spine clearance without imaging. There were no missed CSI in this study. CONCLUSIONS CSI in patients younger than 3 years is uncommon. Four simple clinical predictors can be used in conjunction to the physical examination to substantially reduce the use of radiographic imaging in this patient population.

The impact and sustainability of the graduated driver licensing program in preventing motor vehicle crashes in Massachusetts

BACKGROUND Graduated driving licensing (GDL) programs phase in driving privileges for teenagers. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the 2007 GDL law on the incidence of total motor vehicle crashes (tMVCs) and fatal motor vehicle crashes (fMVCs) among teenagers in Massachusetts. METHODS The Fatality Analysis and Reporting System, the Missouri Census Data Center, and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation databases were all used to create and compare the incidence of tMVCs and fMVCs before (2002–2006) and after (2007–2011) the law enactment. The following three driver age groups were studied: 16 years to 17 years (evaluating the law effect), 18 years to 20 years (evaluating the sustainability of the effect), and 25 years to 29 years (control group). As a sensitivity analysis, we compared the incidence rates per population and per licenses issued. RESULTS tMVCs decreased following the law for all three age groups (16–17 years, from 7.6 to 4.8 per 1,000 people, p < 0.0001; 18–20 years, from 8.5 to 6.4 per 1,000 people, p < 0.0001; 25–29 years, from 6.2 to 5.2 per 1,000 people, p < 0.0001), but the percentage decrease in tMVC rates was less in the control group (37%, 25%, and 15%, respectively; both p’s < 0.0001). The rates of fMVC also decreased in the age groups of 16 years to 17 years (from 14.0 to 8.6 per 100,000 people, p = 0.0006), 18 years to 20 years (from 21.2 to 13.7 per 100,000 people, p < 0.0001), and 25 years to 29 years (from 14.4 to 11.0 per 100,000 people, p < 0.0001). All of these results were confirmed in the sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION The 2007 Massachusetts GDL was associated with a decreased incidence of teenager tMVCs and fMVCs, and the effect was sustainable. This study provides further support to develop, implement, enforce, and maintain GDL programs aimed at preventing MVCs and their related mortality in the young novice driver population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III.

Do trauma systems work? A comparison of major trauma outcomes between Aberdeen Royal Infirmary and Massachusetts General Hospital

Trauma is an important matter of public health and a major cause of mortality. Since the late 1980s trauma care provision in the United Kingdom is lacking when compared to the USA. This has been attributed to a lack of organisation of trauma care leading to the formation of trauma networks and Major Trauma Centres in England and Wales. The need for similar centres in Scotland is argued currently. We assessed the activity of two quite different trauma systems by obtaining access to comparative data from two hospitals, one in the USA and the other in Scotland. Aggregate data on 5604 patients at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI) from 1993 to 2002 was obtained from the Scottish Trauma Audit Group. A comparable data set of 16,178 patients from Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Direct comparison of patient demographics; injury type, mechanism and Injury Severity Score (ISS); mode of arrival; length of stay and mortality were made. Statistical analysis was carried out using Chi-squared and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel. There were significant differences in the data sets. There was a higher proportion of penetrating injuries at MGH, (8.6% vs 2.6%) and more severely injured patients at MGH, patients with an ISS>16 accounted for nearly 22.1% of MGH patients compared to 14.0% at ARI. ISS 8-15 made up 54.6% of ARI trauma with 29.6% at MGH. Falls accounted for 50.1% at ARI and 37.9% at MGH. Despite the higher proportion of severe injuries at MGH and crude mortality rates showing no difference (4.9% ARI vs 5.2% MGH), pooled odds ratio of mortality was 1.4 (95% confidence interval 1.2-1.6) showing worse mortality outcomes at ARI compared to MGH. In conclusion, there were some differences in case mix between both data sets making direct comparison of the outcomes difficult, but the effect of consolidating major trauma on the proportion and number of severely injured patients treated in the American Level 1 centre was clear with a significant improvement in mortality in all injury severity groups.

Cost savings associated with transfer of trauma patients within an accountable care organization

BACKGROUND The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act supports the establishment of accountable care organizations (ACOs) as care delivery models designed to save costs. The potential for these cost savings has been demonstrated in the primary care and inpatient populations, but not for patients with emergency conditions or traumatic injuries. METHODS Our study evaluated adult trauma patients transferred to the tertiary care hospitals of a pioneer ACO, comparing those who were transferred from within the ACO to those from outside the ACO in terms of overall cost of hospitalization. Hospital length of stay and number of imaging studies were predetermined secondary outcomes. RESULTS The study population included 7696 hospitalizations for traumatic injuries over a 5-year period, 85.1% of which were for patients transferred from outside the ACO. Patients transferred from within the ACO had a 7.2% lower overall cost of hospitalization (P = .032). Mean injury severity scores were not significantly different between groups. Differences in mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, and overall hospital length of stay were not significant. However, analysis of radiology studies performed during the hospitalization revealed that patients transferred from within the ACO had, on average, 0.47 fewer advanced imaging studies per hospitalization than did those transferred from outside the ACO (3.55 vs 4.02 studies per hospitalization, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS Adult trauma patients transferred from within an ACO have significantly lower total costs of hospitalization than do those transferred from outside the system, without significant differences in disease burden, hospital length of stay, or mortality.

Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay is Not Associated with Worse Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury

BACKGROUND Data suggest that prolonged Emergency Department length of stay (EDLOS) has a detrimental effect on outcomes in some critically ill patients. However, the relationship between EDLOS and outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) has not been examined. OBJECTIVE Our objective was to determine the effect of EDLOS on neurologic outcomes in TBI patients. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively identified cohort of patients with moderate (Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 9-13) and severe (GCS ≤ 8) TBI who presented to a Level 1 trauma center (2006-2010). Inclusion criteria were transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) or operating room (OR) from the ED. Primary outcome was Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score, a measure of neurologic function, at discharge. We used a proportional odds model to control for significant predictors of GOS in univariate analysis. RESULTS Two hundred and twenty-four patients were included in the analysis, 77 (34%) of which were transferred to the OR. Median EDLOS was 3.3 h and 81.2% of patients had a GOS score ≤3 (e.g., severe disability, vegetative, or deceased). In multivariable analyses, EDLOS was not associated with GOS score in either ICU bound (p = 0.57) or OR bound (p = 0.11) patients. Younger age, pupil reactivity, and absence of intubation were independent predictors of good outcomes in the ICU group. In OR patients, predictors of higher GOS score included presence of an epidural hemorrhage, absence of midline shift, and pupil reactivity. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that EDLOS was not associated with poor outcomes in patients with moderate to severe TBI who required intensive care or early operative intervention in an academic Level 1 trauma center.