Albert Marchetti

Effects of Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective review of randomly selected medical records

BACKGROUND The antihyperglycemic effects of pioglitazone hydrochloride and rosiglitazone maleate are well documented. The results of clinical trials and observational studies have suggested, however, that there are individual differences in the effects of these drugs on blood lipid levels. OBJECTIVE The present study evaluated the effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS This was a retrospective review of randomly selected medical records from 605 primary care practices in the United States in which adults with type 2 diabetes received pioglitazone or rosiglitazone between August 1, 1999, and August 31, 2000. The outcome measures were mean changes in serum concentrations of triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values. RESULTS Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with a reduction in mean TG of 55.17 mg/dL, a reduction in TC of 8.45 mg/dL, an increase in HDL-C of 2.65 mg/dL, and a reduction in LDL-C of 5.05 mg/dL. Treatment with rosiglitazone was associated with a reduction in mean TG of 13.34 mg/dL, an increase in TC of 4.81 mg/dL, a reduction in HDL-C of 0.12 mg/dL, and an increase in LDL-C of 3.56 mg/dL. With the exception of HDL-C, the differences in mean changes in lipid parameters between treatment groups were statistically significant (P < 0.001, pioglitazone vs rosiglitazone). Reductions in HbA1c were statistically equivalent between treatments (1.04% pioglitazone, 1.18% rosiglitazone). CONCLUSIONS Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with greater beneficial effects on blood lipid levels than treatment with rosiglitazone, whereas glycemic control was equivalent between the 2 treatments.

Retrospective Evaluation of the Dose of Dysport and BOTOX in the Management of Cervical Dystonia and Blepharospasm: The REAL DOSE Study

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the real‐world dose utilization of Dysport and BOTOX for cervical dystonia and blepharospasm. Six investigational sites (five countries) were identified. Investigators abstracted utilization data for patients who received Dysport before switching to BOTOX or BOTOX before switching to Dysport. Patients were identified during scheduled clinic visits and selected if they met study criteria, which included treatment for at least 2 consecutive years (at least 1 year with Dysport or BOTOX, then switched and maintained on BOTOX or Dysport for at least another year). A total of 114 patients were included in the assessment. Ratios of mean dose for Dysport to BOTOX ranged from a low of 2:1 to a high of 11:1. Thirty‐one percent of patients fell into the Dysport‐to‐BOTOX ratio grouping of 5:1 to less than 6:1; 30% of patients had a mean ratio of Dysport to BOTOX of 4:1 to less than 5:1; and only 21% of all patients evaluated fell into the Dysport‐to‐BOTOX ratio grouping of 3:1 to less than 4:1. Results are consistent with United Kingdom labeling for botulinum toxins stating that units of different serotype A toxins are not interchangeable and simple dose‐conversion factors are not applicable.

Impact of palivizumab on expected costs of respiratory syncytial virus infection in preterm infants: Potential for savings

In its clinical assessment of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-specific monoclonal antibody palivizumab, the IMpact-RSV Study Group demonstrated a reduction in hospitalizations for RSV-related lower respiratory tract infection in infants who received prophylaxis compared with infants who did not receive prophylaxis. An assessment of the RSV-related expenses for managing both groups of infants is needed to provide insight into the value of prophylaxis. The present study was conducted to identify and compare RSV-related health care expenditures incurred by infants who did not receive prophylaxis throughout one RSV season and after. Using a decision-analytic model populated with data from the contemporary medical literature, a pharmacoeconomic study was conducted from the perspective of the payer. Probabilities for RSV-related hospitalizations of infants who did and did not receive prophylaxis were abstracted from several published studies. Components of inpatient and outpatient care were identified through examination of hospital records, reviews of the published literature, and consultation with expert clinicians. Charges related to prophylaxis and medical management of infection were abstracted from hospital billing records and published data. Appropriate charges were applied to decision-tree branches and multiplied by in-line probabilities for outcomes. Products at terminal nodes were summed to establish total expected charges for both groups of infants. Widespread clinical use of prophylactic palivizumab would result in incremental expenses < or =

Pharmacoeconomic analysis of oral therapies for onychomycosis: a US model

3459 per infant or cost savings < or =

Impact of adjunctive thiazolidinedione therapy on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

39,107 per infant. The variability in value of prophylaxis derives from the rate of RSV-related hospitalizations in the community and the total health care expense of managing infected infants.

Multicenter retrospective assessment of thiazolidinedione monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: Comparative subgroup analyses of glycemic control and blood lipid levels

An evaluation of treatment practices in 13 countries, not including the United States, has shown oral terbinafine to be more cost-effective (from a government payer perspective) than griseofulvin, itraconazole, and ketoconazole in the treatment of onychomycosis of toenails and fingernails. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic effects of oral griseofulvin, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and terbinafine in the treatment of onychomycosis from the perspective of a third-party payer in the United States. A previously constructed decision-analytic model evaluating the costs of onychomycosis in 13 countries outside the United States was updated to determine the costs of treating onychomycosis in the United States. Clinical management patterns were assessed to identify and quantify physician visits, laboratory tests, and adverse drug reaction treatment components for patients with toenail and fingernail onychomycosis. A random-effects model meta-analysis of treatment efficacy (mycologic cure) and New York Metropolitan Medicare charge data for physician fees were used in the treatment model. A sensitivity analysis assessing alternative dosing regimens and a rank order stability analysis investigating the effects of length of treatment, success rates, relapse rates, and drug acquisition costs on overall results were also conducted. Terbinafine had the lowest cost per mycologic cure after one treatment regimen for onychomycosis in both toenail and fingernail infections (

A Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Intravenous Fosphenytoin (Cerebyx@) Versus Intravenous Phenytoin (Dilantin@) in Hospital Emergency Departments

791.00 and

Pharmacotherapies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: expected-cost analysis

454.00, respectively). The costs of treating toenail and fingernail infections were comparatively higher for therapy with itraconazole (

A pharmacoeconomic analysis of topical therapies for patients with mild-to-moderate stable plaque psoriasis : A US study

1535.00 and

Longitudinal assessment of the dose consistency of botulinum toxin type a (BOTOX®) for cervical dystonia

767.00, respectively), griseofulvin (