Alberto M Pedroncelli

Pasireotide versus continued treatment with octreotide or lanreotide in patients with inadequately controlled acromegaly (PAOLA): a randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND Many patients with acromegaly do not achieve biochemical control despite receiving high doses of the first-generation somatostatin analogues octreotide or lanreotide. In the PAOLA trial, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of two different doses of the somatostatin analogue pasireotide long-acting release compared with active control (octreotide or lanreotide) in patients with inadequately controlled acromegaly. METHODS In a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled eligible patients aged 18 years or older with acromegaly who were inadequately controlled (5-point, 2 h mean growth hormone concentration >2·5 μg/L and insulin-like growth factor 1 [IGF-1] concentration >1·3 times the upper normal limit) and had received 30 mg octreotide long-acting repeatable or 120 mg lanreotide (Somatuline Autogel; Ipsen, UK) as monotherapy for 6 months or longer. We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1:1 ratio with an interactive voice-web response system to receive 40 mg pasireotide long-acting release once every 28 days for 24 weeks, 60 mg pasireotide long-acting release once every 28 days for 24 weeks, or continued treatment with octreotide or lanreotide (active control). Patients were stratified according to previous treatment (octreotide or lanreotide) and growth hormone concentrations at screening (2·5-10 μg/L and >10 μg/L). Patients and study investigators were not masked to study drug assignment but were masked to pasireotide dose allocation. The primary endpoint was number of patients achieving biochemical control, defined as mean growth hormone concentration less than 2·5 μg/L and normalised IGF-1 concentration. Efficacy analyses were based on intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01137682. FINDINGS Between Dec 17, 2010, and Aug 6, 2012, 198 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to pasireotide 40 mg (n=65), pasireotide 60 mg (n=65), or active control (n=68) groups. At 24 weeks, ten (15%) patients in the pasireotide 40 mg group and 13 (20%) patients in the pasireotide 60 mg group achieved biochemical control, compared with no patients in the active control group (absolute difference from control group 15·4%, 95% CI 7·6-26·5, p=0·0006 for pasireotide 40 mg group, 20·0%, 11·1-31·8, p<0·0001 for pasireotide 60 mg group). The most common adverse events were hyperglycaemia (21 [33%] for treatment with 40 mg pasireotide, 19 [31%] with 60 mg pasireotide, and nine [14%] with active control), diabetes (13 [21%], 16 [26%], and five [8%]), and diarrhoea (ten [16%], 12 [19%], and three [5%]); most were grade 1 or 2 in severity. Serious adverse events were reported in six (10%) patients in the pasireotide 40 mg group, two (3%) in the pasireotide 60 mg group, and three (5%) in the active control group. INTERPRETATION Pasireotide provides superior efficacy compared with continued treatment with octreotide or lanreotide, and could become the new standard pituitary-directed treatment in patients with acromegaly who are inadequately controlled using first-generation somatostatin analogues. FUNDING Novartis Pharma AG. Financial support for medical editorial assistance was provided by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Medical Treatment of Cushing’s Disease: Somatostatin Analogues and Pasireotide

Cushing’s disease is Cushing’s syndrome caused by an adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma and, in the absence of adequate treatment, can be fatal. Cushing’s disease represents an unmet medical need, with no approved medical therapies. Pasireotide is a novel multi-receptor-targeted somatostatin analogue with high affinity for sst1,2,3 and sst5. Compared with octreotide, pasireotide has an in vitro binding affinity 40-, 30- and 5-fold higher for sst5, sst1 and sst3, respectively, and 2-fold lower for sst2. Adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas predominantly express sst5, followed by sst2 and sst1, suggesting that pasireotide may be effective in the treatment of Cushing’s disease. In a 15-day phase II trial of pasireotide 600 µg s.c. b.i.d. in patients with de novo or persistent/recurrent Cushing’s disease, 22 of 29 patients (76%) achieved reduced urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels, 5 of whom (17%) achieved normalized UFC. Patients who achieved normalized UFC had a significantly greater reduction in serum cortisol than those who did not (p = 0.04), and minimum pasireotide plasma concentrations appeared to be higher in responders. Based on these results, a randomized, double-blind phase III study comparing pasireotide 600 µg b.i.d. and 900 µg b.i.d. was initiated and is ongoing. This is the largest ever phase III study in patients with Cushing’s disease. The primary end point of this study is normalization of UFC after 6 months of treatment. Finally, preliminary results from a study on 17 patients with Cushing’s disease suggest that the combined use of pasireotide, cabergoline and low-dose ketoconazole may have additive beneficial effects in the medical treatment of Cushing’s disease.

Phase I, open-label study of pasireotide in patients with BRAF-wild type and NRAS-wild type, unresectable and/or metastatic melanoma

Introduction Somatostatin analogues exert antitumour activity via direct and indirect mechanisms. The present study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of pasireotide in patients with BRAF-wild type (WT) and NRAS-WT metastatic melanoma. Patients and methods Patients with unresectable and/or metastatic melanoma or Merkel cell carcinoma were eligible. Pasireotide was administered at different doses for ≤8 weeks in dose-escalation phase, followed by long-acting pasireotide 80 mg or lower dose in case of toxicity in follow-up phase up to six additional months. Primary endpoint was safety in the first 8 weeks of dose-escalation phase. Results The study was terminated early due to slow recruitment. Of the 10 patients with metastatic melanoma enrolled, only four reached the high dose level: two patients reached 3600 µg in dose-escalation and follow-up phases and two patients reached 3600 µg in dose-escalation and long-acting pasireotide 80 mg in follow-up phases and were stable for >5 months. Most common adverse events (AEs) during dose-escalation phase in ≥2 patients (20%) were: diarrhoea (50%), nausea (50%), fatigue (20%), hyperglycaemia (20%), hypophosphatemia (20%), chills (20%) and tumour pain (20%). Grade 3 or 4 study drug-related AEs were diarrhoea and nausea, reported in one patient. Partial response was documented in one patient and stable disease in another. Conclusions Pasireotide was well tolerated, and safety results were similar to those previously reported in other indications. Further studies are needed to evaluate its antitumour activity alone and in combination with other drugs in melanoma.

Lanreotide slow release in the treatment of acromegaly: a study in 66 patients

OBJECTIVE Slow-release (SR) lanreotide is a long-acting somatostatin analog that has been developed in order to overcome the inconvenience of multiple daily subcutaneous injections of octreotide, required for metabolic control in acromegaly. Lanreotide SR has been found to be well tolerated and effective in reducing GH and IGF-I levels but clinical data are still limited compared with those with subcutaneous octreotide treatment. DESIGN Sixty-six unselected patients with active acromegaly were therefore evaluated in a multi-center, prospective, open label study. Lanreotide SR was given at a dose of 30mg intramuscular every 7-14 days. METHODS At baseline and after 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 weeks patients underwent a clinical examination with assessment of acromegaly related symptoms, and blood was sampled for serum GH, IGF-I, prolactin, glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, hematology, kidney function and liver function tests. Biliary ultrasonography and pituitary magnetic resonance imaging were performed at baseline and after one year. RESULTS Treatment resulted in a significant improvement in the symptom score from 2.69+/-0.27 to 1.06+/-0.17 (P<0.0001). Serum IGF-I levels fell from 699+/-38microg/l at baseline to 399+/-26microg/l (P<0.0001, n=60) after one month, after which levels remained stable: 480+/-37microg/l after 6 months (n=54) and 363+/-32microg/l after one year (n=46). GH levels dropped from 13.8+/-3.2microg/l to 4.3+/-0.7microg/l after one month (P<0.0001, n=60) and remained stable thereafter: 3.9+/-0.4microg/l (n=54) after 6 months and 3.5+/-1.1microg/l after one year (n=46). Twenty-nine out of 66 patients (44%) attained a normal age-corrected IGF-I level and 30 patients (45%) attained a GH level below 2.5microg/l. Pituitary adenoma shrinkage of at least 25% was found in 5 of 14 patients (36%) after one year. Side effects were mainly transient gastrointestinal symptoms and pain at the injection site, resulting in drug discontinuation in only 6 patients (9%). Two patients developed new gall stones. No difference was found between subcutaneous octreotide and lanreotide SR in efficacy and almost all patients preferred the easier dose administration of lanreotide SR. CONCLUSIONS Long-term treatment of acromegaly with SR-lanreotide is effective in controlling GH and IGF-I levels and symptoms and is well tolerated in the majority of patients. Compared with subcutaneous octreotide, lanreotide SR considerably improves patients acceptance of therapy while having the same overall efficacy.