Alberto Saita

Our experience with nifedipine and prednisolone as expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.

Objectives: We evaluated the effect of nifedipine associated with prednisolone in ureteral stone passage. Material and Methods: In our department we enrolled 50 patients with radiopaque ureteral stones. Stone size was 15 mm or less. The patients were divided into two groups: group I included 25 patients who received 30 mg oral treatment of slow – release nifedipine (for a maximum of 20 days) and 25 mg of prednisolone (for a maximum of 10 days) daily. Group II was made up of 25 patients who received 25 mg of prednisolone daily. On request, both groups could use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Results: The mean expulsion time was 6 days in group I and 10 days in group II. The average stone size was 12 mm in group I and 12.8 mm in group II. Six patients suspended therapy in group I (5 erythema, 1 stomachache), and seven in group II (3 because of intolerable pain, 4 stomachache). The expulsion success rates were 68% in group I and 81% in group II. Conclusions: For ureteral stones that do not cause an emergency situation, such as obstructive uropathy, infection or intolerable pain, we suggest expulsive medical treatment with nifedipine and prednisolone, if there are no contraindications to drug use.

Immunohistochemical and molecular analysis in recurrent urethral stricture

Abstract The authors have analyzed the most recent additions to the literature of immunohistochemical and molecular assessment of acquired urethral strictures and report on their data obtained in a selected clinical series. Innovative immunohistochemical studies in patients presenting with plurirecurrent symptoms suggest that urethral mesenchymal changes caused by tissue de-epithelialization may be the underlying cause of stricture. This condition may be congenital or acquired. It may determine aberrant connective tissue formation induced by abnormal fibroblastic activation with formation of over abundant hyperdense collagen scar tissue.

Urolithiasis in Italy: An epidemiological study

OBJECTIVES Worldwide the urolithiasis is the third most frequent urological disease affecting both males and females. In literature there are not recent Italian epidemiological data about stone disease. The objective of this study is the evaluation of current epidemiology of urolithiasis in Italy using the Health Search/CSD Longitudinal Patient Database (HS) database. MATERIAL AND METHODS An observational, descriptive, retrospective trial was conducted. Inclusion criteria were: family physician- assisted Italian living population member of HS database within 31 December 2012, both genders, age over 17 years, at least two years of clinical history recorded from the beginning the trial. Data were collected by HS database and elaborated by its software Millewin®. RESULTS In Italy prevalence of urolithiasis in 2012 was 4.14%, it was higher in males than in females (4.53% versus 3.78%) with a positive relation with increasing age. The highest prevalence rate of urolithiasis was reported in the region Campania (6.08%). The general incidence was 2.23 * 1000, with the highest incidence in the region Sicilia (3.15 * 1000). Incidence was higher in group age 65-74 years (3.18 * 1000). CONCLUSIONS In Italy the incidence and prevalence of urolithiasis is increasing with particular distribution in relation to gender, age and regional position.

Pneumatic Lithotripsy versus Holmium:YAG Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Single Ureteral Stones: A Prospective, Single-Blinded Study

Objective: The aim of this prospective single-blinded study was to analyze the stone-free (SF) rates between pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) and laser lithotripsy (LL) for the treatment of single and primary ureteral stones and to evaluate potentially predictive factors of a SF status. Material and Methods: From January 2010 to January 2011, 133 consecutive patients with single and primary ureteral stones were prospectively enrolled. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression were performed to estimate predictive factors of a SF status. Results: The SF rate in the PL group was 80.7 and 86.1% in the LL group (p = 0.002). Success rates with regard of stone position were not significantly different between groups. At univariate logistic regression, middle ureteral stone (OR 3.33, p = 0.04), distal ureteral stone (OR 4.4, p = 0.02), LL (OR 3.05, p = 0.04) and Hounsfield units (HUs) (OR 1.07, p = 0.03) were significantly predictive factors of a SF status. At a multivariate logistic regression, middle ureteral stone (OR 5.58, p = 0.01), distal ureteral stone (OR 7.87, p < 0.01), LL (OR 2.4, p = 0.02) and HUs ≥1,200 (OR 1.15, p = 0.02) were significantly associated with a SF status. Conclusions: LL significantly influences the SF status after ureteroscopy, allowing a higher SF rate when compared to PL. HUs may significantly influence this success rate.

ESWL: Comparing Two Analgesic Techniques

Objective: We compared the effects of intramuscular analgesia versus intramuscular analgesia associated with topical application of Luan® (gel containing lidocaine 1%) on the efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). Material and Methods: From January 2001 to November 2002, 300 patients (mean age 46) were treated for kidney or upper ureteral radiopaque stones with ESWL, using a Dornier Compact Delta magneto lithotripter. The patients were divided into two groups: group A, 180 patients, received intramuscular analgesia with Ketorolac 30 mg, Tramadolo 100 mg and, during treatment, intravenous betametasone 4 mg. Group B, 120 patients, received the same pharmacological treatment associated with topical application of Luan. Results: At 3 months, the stone-free rate in group A was 61% compared with 79% in group B. The energy of treatment was less than 13 kV in group A and less than 15 kV in group B. Conclusions: For ESWL treatment of kidney stones of 20 mm or less and ureteral stones of 15 mm or less, we suggest local analgesia with topical Luan and intramuscular analgesia. This approach increases the success rate of ESWL and reduces the discomfort associated with treatment.

Active Surveillance for Low Risk Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Confirmatory and Resource Consumption Study from the BIAS Project

Purpose: We investigated predictive factors of failure and performed a resource consumption analysis in patients who underwent active surveillance for nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study monitored patients with a history of pathologically confirmed stage pTa (grade 1‐2) or pT1a (grade 2) nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer, and recurrent small size and number of tumors without hematuria and positive urine cytology. The primary end point was the failure rate of active surveillance. Assessment of failure predictive variables and per year direct hospital resource consumption analysis were secondary outcomes. Descriptive statistical analysis and Cox regression with univariable and multivariable analysis were done. Results: Of 625 patients with nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer 122 with a total of 146 active surveillance events were included in the protocol. Of the events 59 (40.4%) were deemed to require treatment after entering active surveillance. Median time on active surveillance was 11 months (IQR 5–26). Currently 76 patients (62.3%) remain under observation. On univariable analysis only time from the first transurethral resection to the start of active surveillance seemed to be inversely associated with recurrence‐free survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.00, p = 0.027). Multivariable analysis also revealed an association with age at active surveillance start (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94–1.00, p = 0.031) and the size of the lesion at the first transurethral resection (HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.06–2.27, p = 0.025). The average specific annual resource consumption savings for each avoided transurethral bladder tumor resection was &U20AC;1,378 for each intervention avoided. Conclusions: Active surveillance might be a reasonable clinical and cost‐effective strategy in patients who present with small, low grade pTa/pT1a recurrent papillary bladder tumors.

Role of Restaging Transurethral Resection for T1 Non–muscle invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT Repeat transurethral resection (reTUR) is advocated as a fundamental step towards complete clearance and appropriate staging of T1 bladder cancer tumors. OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of reTUR in T1 bladder cancer via a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of available data sets. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION After definition of the population and of the outcome, a systematic search of English language articles in the literature from 1980 to 2016 was performed. The pooled prevalence of residual tumor and of upstaging at reTUR were assessed and computed using a random effects model to take into account heterogeneity showed by I2 and Cochrans Q values. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to exclude excessive influence by a single study. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Among the papers identified, 29 were selected. A total of 3566 and 2556 cases formed the study population for assessment of the prevalence of residual tumor and upstaging, respectively. The corresponding numbers for the subgroup with detrusor muscle involvement at the initial TUR were 1565 and 1187. The pooled prevalence was 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.63) for residual tumor and 0.1 (95% CI 0.06-0.14) for upstaging to T2 at reTUR. The corresponding rates for the detrusor muscle subgroup were 0.47 (95% CI 0.33-0.62) and 0.1 (95% CI 0.06-0.14). The sensitivity analysis excluded an excessive influence of each of the studies examined. CONCLUSIONS Pooled prevalence rates for residual tumor (∼50%) and upstaging to invasive disease (10%) at reTUR in T1 cases were high, and were stable among studies in different decades and for cases with detrusor muscle involvement at the initial TUR. Therefore, reTUR remains a fundamental procedure. PATIENT SUMMARY Repeat transurethral resection after a diagnosis of stage T1 bladder cancer is recommended given the high risk of misallocation to the proper treatment.

68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Men with Contraindications to or Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Observational Study

Purpose: 68Ga labeled prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography may represent the most promising imaging modality to identify and risk stratify prostate cancer in patients with contraindications to or negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Materials and Methods: In this prospective observational study we analyzed 68Ga labeled prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in a select group of patients with persistently elevated prostate specific antigen and/or Prostate Health Index suspicious for prostate cancer, negative digital rectal examination and at least 1 negative biopsy. The cohort comprised men with equivocal multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Prostate Imaging‐Reporting and Data System, version 2 score of 2 or less), or an absolute or relative contraindication to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Sensitivity, specificity and CIs were calculated compared to histopathology findings. ROC analysis was applied to determine the optimal cutoff values of 68Ga labeled prostate specific membrane antigen uptake to identify clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason score 7 or greater). Results: A total of 45 patients with a median age of 64 years were referred for 68Ga labeled prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography between January and August 2017. The 25 patients (55.5%) considered to have positive positron emission tomography results underwent software assisted fusion biopsy. We determined the uptake values of regions of interest, including a median maximum standardized uptake value of 5.34 (range 2.25 to 30.41) and a maximum‐to‐background standardized uptake value ratio of 1.99 (range 1.06 to 14.42). Mean and median uptake values on 68Ga labeled prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (ie the maximum standardized uptake value or the maximum‐to‐background standardized uptake value ratio) were significantly higher for Gleason score 7 lesions than for Gleason score 6 or benign lesions (p <0.001). On ROC analysis a maximum standardized uptake value of 5.4 and a maximum‐to‐background standardized uptake value ratio of 2 discriminated clinically relevant prostate cancer with 100% overall sensitivity in each case, and 76% and 88% specificity, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings support the use of 68Ga labeled prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for primary detection of prostate cancer in a specific subset of men.

MP49-13 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE OUTCOMES OF TRANSPERITONEAL AND RETROPERITONEAL ROBOT-ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY: RESULTS FROM A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL HIGH-VOLUME CENTERS EXPERIENCE

benoit peyronnet*, rennes, France; nicolas doumerc, toulouse, France; christophe vaessen, thomas seisen, paris, France; mathieu roumiguie, toulouse, France; benjamin pradere, rennes, France; charles chahwan, cr eteil, France; jean-baptiste beauval, francois-xavier nouhaud, toulouse, France; gregory verhoest, rennes, France; laurent salomon, cr eteil, France; morgan roupret, paris, France; karim bensalah, rennes, France; alexandre de la taille, cr eteil, France

MP77-03 TARGETED 11C-CHOLINE PET/CT/TRUS SOFTWARE FUSION-GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY HAS IN MEN WITH PERSISTENTLY ELEVATED PSA AFTER PREVIOUS NEGATIVE BIOPSY

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Assess the feasibility and the accuracy of targeted prostate biopsy with standard (systematic 12-core) biopsies after fusion imaging of choline-PET/CT (choline-PET) and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with 3D-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to detect prostate cancer. The Fusion of the two modality with echography 3d was try to compare the diagnostic performance for localization of primary PCa with (mpMRI) and last generation of PET/CT (Biograph mCT Flow, Siemens). METHODS: Within a prospective single-center study, from December 2014 to October 2016, 31 patients with a rising PSA ? 10ng/ ml or with an history of a negative prostate biopsies were included, and performed a choline-PET and a mpMRI. PET and T2-weighted MR volumes of the prostate were spatially registered using commercially available software. Biopsy targets were selected on both modalities. TRUS biopsy using the real-time 3D TRUS-tracking system (Urostation Touch , Koelis, France), which enabled US-guided and/or MR/US fusion targeted biopsies. The biopsy procedure was performed after registration of real-time TRUS with mpMRI and choline-PET by the same operator, using 3D TRUS-tracking system. At the time of biopsy, volume data of the mpMRI and PET 18-ch was elastically fused with TRUS. Each target was biopsied twice. Histologic results were determined from standard and targeted biopsy cores. RESULTS: Mean PSA was 13.01 ng/ml (5.32-73). Mean number of biopsy was 16 (13-21) and mean prostate volume was 63.41 cc (25-169). The cancer detection rate was 69%. The cancer detection rate with standard biopsies off target was 42% and with prostate targeted biopsy was 50% using PET, 65% using mpMRI with a sensibility of 72%, 94%, 100% respectively for PET, mpMRI or both . The average number of positive cores was respectively 1.77 (1-7) ,2.74 (3-11) for PET and mpMRI. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of multimodal image registration for targeted prostate biopsies with echography 3D to define localization of prostate cancer, compared to standard biopsies. It was very interesting to observe sometimes a great difference in the distribution of PET choline targets and mpMRI targets in the prostate. mpMRI was probably better than PET to detected prostate cancer but it could be complementary. A new study with a novel ligands targeting prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) could improve our clinical results.