Alejandra Bravo

How Bacillus thuringiensis has evolved specific toxins to colonize the insect world

Bacillus thuringiensis is a bacterium of great agronomic and scientific interest. Together the subspecies of this bacterium colonize and kill a large variety of host insects and even nematodes, but each strain does so with a high degree of specificity. This is mainly determined by the arsenal of crystal proteins that the bacterium produces during sporulation. Here we describe the properties of these toxin proteins and the current knowledge of the basis for their specificity. Assessment of phylogenetic relationships of the three domains of the active toxin and experimental results indicate how sequence divergence in combination with domain swapping by homologous recombination might have caused this extensive range of specificities.

Bacillus thuringiensis: A story of a successful bioinsecticide.

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) bacteria are insect pathogens that rely on insecticidal pore forming proteins known as Cry and Cyt toxins to kill their insect larval hosts. At least four different non-structurally related families of proteins form the Cry toxin group of toxins. The expression of certain Cry toxins in transgenic crops has contributed to an efficient control of insect pests resulting in a significant reduction in chemical insecticide use. The mode of action of the three domain Cry toxin family involves sequential interaction of these toxins with several insect midgut proteins facilitating the formation of a pre-pore oligomer structure and subsequent membrane insertion that leads to the killing of midgut insect cells by osmotic shock. In this manuscript we review recent progress in understanding the mode of action of this family of proteins in lepidopteran, dipteran and coleopteran insects. Interestingly, similar Cry-binding proteins have been identified in the three insect orders, as cadherin, aminopeptidase-N and alkaline phosphatase suggesting a conserved mode of action. Also, recent data on insect responses to Cry toxin attack is discussed. Finally, we review the different Bt based products, including transgenic crops, that are currently used in agriculture.

Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal three-domain Cry toxins: mode of action, insect resistance and consequences for crop protection

Bacillus thuringiensis bacteria are insect pathogens that produce different Cry and Cyt toxins to kill their hosts. Here we review the group of three-domain Cry (3d-Cry) toxins. Expression of these 3d-Cry toxins in transgenic crops has contributed to efficient control of insect pests and a reduction in the use of chemical insecticides. The mode of action of 3d-Cry toxins involves sequential interactions with several insect midgut proteins that facilitate the formation of an oligomeric structure and induce its insertion into the membrane, forming a pore that kills midgut cells. We review recent progress in our understanding of the mechanism of action of these Cry toxins and focus our attention on the different mechanisms of resistance that insects have evolved to counter their action, such as mutations in cadherin, APN and ABC transporter genes. Activity of Cry1AMod toxins, which are able to form toxin oligomers in the absence of receptors, against different resistant populations, including those affected in the ABC transporter and the role of dominant negative mutants as antitoxins, supports the hypothesis that toxin oligomerization is a limiting step in the Cry insecticidal activity. Knowledge of the action of 3d-Cry toxin and the resistance mechanisms to these toxins will set the basis for a rational design of novel toxins to overcome insect resistance, extending the useful lifespan of Cry toxins in insect control programs.

Cadherin‐like receptor binding facilitates proteolytic cleavage of helix α‐1 in domain I and oligomer pre‐pore formation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab toxin

Cry toxins form lytic pores in the insect midgut cells. The role of receptor interaction in the process of protoxin activation was analyzed. Incubation of Cry1Ab protoxin with a single chain antibody that mimics the cadherin‐like receptor and treatment with Manduca sexta midgut juice or trypsin, resulted in toxin preparations with high pore‐forming activity in vitro. This activity correlates with the formation of a 250 kDa oligomer that lacks the helix α‐1 of domain I. The oligomer, in contrast with the 60 kDa monomer, was capable of membrane insertion as judged by 8‐anilino‐1‐naphthalenesulfonate binding. Cry1Ab protoxin was also activated to a 250 kDa oligomer by incubation with brush border membrane vesicles, presumably by the action of a membrane‐associated protease. Finally, a model where receptor binding allows the efficient cleavage of α‐1 and formation of a pre‐pore oligomeric structure that is efficient in pore formation, is presented.

Engineering Modified Bt Toxins to Counter Insect Resistance

The evolution of insect resistance threatens the effectiveness of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxins that are widely used in sprays and transgenic crops. Resistance to Bt toxins in some insects is linked with mutations that disrupt a toxin-binding cadherin protein. We show that susceptibility to the Bt toxin Cry1Ab was reduced by cadherin gene silencing with RNA interference in Manduca sexta, confirming cadherins role in Bt toxicity. Native Cry1A toxins required cadherin to form oligomers, but modified Cry1A toxins lacking one α-helix did not. The modified toxins killed cadherin-silenced M. sexta and Bt-resistant Pectinophora gossypiella that had cadherin deletion mutations. Our findings suggest that cadherin promotes Bt toxicity by facilitating toxin oligomerization and demonstrate that the modified Bt toxins may be useful against pests resistant to standard Bt toxins.

How to cope with insect resistance to Bt toxins

Transgenic Bt crops producing insecticidal crystalline proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis, so-called Cry toxins, have proved useful in controlling insect pests. However, the future of Bt crops is threatened by the evolution of insect resistance. Understanding how Bt toxins work and how insects become resistant will provide the basis for taking measures to counter resistance. Here we review possible mechanisms of resistance and different strategies to cope with resistance, such as expression of several toxins with different modes of action in the same plant, modified Cry toxins active against resistant insects, and the potential use of Cyt toxins or a fragment of cadherin receptor. These approaches should provide the means to assure the successful use of Bt crops for an extended period of time.

Signaling versus punching hole: How do Bacillus thuringiensis toxins kill insect midgut cells?

Abstract.Cry proteins, produced by Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), are widely used for the control of insect pests in agriculture as spray products or expressed in transgenic crops, such as maize and cotton. Little was known regarding the mechanism of action of these toxins when the first commercial Bt product was introduced fifty years ago. However, research on the mechanism of action over the last two decades has enhanced our knowledge of toxin interaction with membrane receptors and their effects in insect midgut cells. All this information allowed for the rational design of improved toxins with higher toxicity or toxins that overcome insect resistance, which could compromise Bt use and effectiveness in the field. In this review we discuss and evaluate the different models of the mode of action of Cry toxins, including a discussion about the role of various receptors in toxin action.

Diversity of Bacillus thuringiensis Strains from Latin America with Insecticidal Activity against Different Mosquito Species

ABSTRACT The characterization of selected Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from different Latin America countries is presented. Characterization was based on their insecticidal activity against Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Anopheles albimanus larvae, scanning electron microscopy, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and plasmid profiles as well as PCR analysis using novel general and specific primers for cry and cyt genes encoding proteins active against mosquitoes (cyt1, cyt2, cry2, cry4A, cry4B, cry10, cry11, cry17, cry19, cry24, cry25, cry27, cry29, cry30, cry32, cry39, and cry40). Strains LBIT315, LBIT348, and IB604 showed threefold higher mosquitocidal activity against A. aegypti and C. quinquefasciatus larvae than B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and displayed high similarities with the B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis used in this study with regard to protein and plasmid profiles and the presence of cry genes. Strain 147-8906 has activity against A. aegypti similar to that of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis but has different protein and plasmid profiles. This strain, harboring cry11, cry30, cyt1, and cyt2 genes, could be relevant for future resistance management interventions. Finally, the PCR screening strategy presented here led us to identify a putative novel cry11B gene.

A GPI-anchored alkaline phosphatase is a functional midgut receptor of Cry11Aa toxin in Aedes aegypti larvae

A 65 kDa GPI (glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol)-anchored ALP (alkaline phosphatase) was characterized as a functional receptor of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis Cry11Aa toxin in Aedes aegypti midgut cells. Two (a 100 kDa and a 65 kDa) GPI-anchored proteins that bound Cry11Aa toxin were preferentially extracted after treatment of BBMV (brush boder membrane vesicles) from Ae. aegypti midgut epithelia with phospholipase C. The 65 kDa protein was further purified by toxin affinity chromatography. The 65 kDa protein showed ALP activity. The peptide-displaying phages (P1.BBMV and P8.BBMV) that bound to the 65 kDa GPI-ALP (GPI-anchored ALP) and competed with the Cry11Aa toxin to bind to BBMV were isolated by selecting BBMV-binding peptide-phages by biopanning. GPI-ALP was shown to be preferentially distributed in Ae. aegypti in the posterior part of the midgut and in the caeca, by using P1.BBMV binding to fixed midgut tissue sections to determine the location of GPI-ALP. Cry11Aa binds to the same regions of the midgut and competed with P1.BBMV and P8.BBMV to bind to BBMV. The importance of this interaction was demonstrated by the in vivo attenuation of Cry11Aa toxicity in the presence of these phages. Our results shows that GPI-ALP is an important receptor molecule involved in Cry11Aa interaction with midgut cells and toxicity to Ae. aegypti larvae.

Immunocytochemical localization of Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal proteins in intoxicated insects

The damage of different insecticidal crystal proteins (ICPs) from Bacillus thuringiensis to the midgut of Manduca sexta, Plutella xylostella, and Leptinotarsa decemlineata larvae was determined by light microscopic observations. During the intoxication process, the distribution of the different ICPs in the larval body was monitored with specific antibodies. In lepidopteran and in coleopteran insects, histopathological changes include disruption of the brush border, vacuolization of the cytoplasm, hypertrophy of the epithelial cells, and disintegration of the cell. After ingestion by the insect larvae, the ICPs rapidly accumulate in the peritrophic membrane. However, the binding to the peritrophic membrane does not correlate with toxicity, since the coleopteran-specific toxin (CryIIIA) is also retained in the peritrophic membrane of lepidopteran insects, while the lepidopteran-specific toxin CryIA(b) binds to the peritrophic membrane of the Colorado potato beetle larvae. In contrast, ICPs bind to the microvilli of the midgut epithelial cells of susceptible insects only, confirming a correlation between toxicity and binding to the brush border membrane. In the lepidopteran larvae, the lepidopteran-specific toxic ICPs initially accumulate at the apical microvilli of the epithelial cells in the anterior part of the midgut. In the Colorado potato beetle larvae, CryIIIA is primarily retained by the microvilli of the epithelial cells from the posterior part of the midgut. During the intoxication process, internalization of the ICPs into midgut epithelial cells is not detected, even several hours after toxin ingestion. Apparently, the ICPs are retained within the gut since they were not detected in other organs such as the Malpighian tubules.